ADSK vs. CRWD: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ADSK and CRWD, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
CRWD stands out with 108.28 billion USD in market value—about 1.73× ADSK’s market cap of 62.67 billion USD.
With betas of 1.47 for ADSK and 1.22 for CRWD, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | ADSK | CRWD |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Autodesk, Inc. | CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure |
| CEO | Dr. Andrew Anagnost Ph.D. | Mr. George R. Kurtz |
| Price | 292.93 USD | 434.74 USD |
| Market Cap | 62.67 billion USD | 108.28 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.47 | 1.22 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | June 28, 1985 | June 12, 2019 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ADSK and CRWD over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ADSK and CRWD based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- CRWD shows a negative P/E of -5570.63, highlighting a year of losses, whereas ADSK at 56.64 trades on solid profitability.
- CRWD shows a negative forward PEG of -213.97, signaling expected earnings contraction, while ADSK at 4.08 maintains analysts’ projections for stable or improved profits.
| Symbol | ADSK | CRWD |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 56.64 | -5570.63 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 4.08 | -213.97 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 10.22 | 27.39 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 24.03 | 32.73 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 39.99 | 98.27 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 41.48 | 434.11 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 10.38 | 26.49 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 40.61 | 95.06 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither ADSK nor CRWD currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.
| Symbol | ADSK | CRWD |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ADSK and CRWD, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- ADSK’s current ratio of 0.68 signals a possible liquidity squeeze, while CRWD at 1.77 comfortably covers its short-term obligations.
- ADSK’s quick ratio of 0.68 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas CRWD at 1.77 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
- ADSK shows “--” (minimal interest expense), but CRWD is in the red with interest coverage -4.58, signaling a net operating loss.
| Symbol | ADSK | CRWD |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.68 | 1.77 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.68 | 1.77 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.98 | 0.24 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.24 | 0.09 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | -4.58 |