ADSK vs. CRM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ADSK and CRM, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
CRM stands out with 270.84 billion USD in market value—about 4.32× ADSK’s market cap of 62.67 billion USD.
With betas of 1.47 for ADSK and 1.42 for CRM, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | ADSK | CRM |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Autodesk, Inc. | Salesforce, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application |
| CEO | Dr. Andrew Anagnost Ph.D. | Mr. Marc R. Benioff |
| Price | 292.93 USD | 282.28 USD |
| Market Cap | 62.67 billion USD | 270.84 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.47 | 1.42 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | June 28, 1985 | June 23, 2004 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ADSK and CRM over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between ADSK and CRM, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | ADSK | CRM |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 56.64 | 43.68 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 4.08 | 3.85 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 10.22 | 7.15 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 24.03 | 4.43 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 39.99 | 21.78 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 41.48 | 33.74 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 10.38 | 7.21 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 40.61 | 21.99 |
Dividend Comparison
ADSK offers a 0% dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while CRM provides a 0.57% dividend yield, giving investors a steady income stream.
| Symbol | ADSK | CRM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.57% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ADSK and CRM, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- ADSK’s current ratio of 0.68 signals a possible liquidity squeeze, while CRM at 1.06 comfortably covers its short-term obligations.
- ADSK’s quick ratio of 0.68 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas CRM at 1.06 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
- Neither ADSK nor CRM records interest coverage (both “--”), indicating virtually no interest expense—usually a sign of negligible debt.
| Symbol | ADSK | CRM |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.68 | 1.06 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.68 | 1.06 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.98 | 0.19 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.24 | 0.11 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | -- |