ADSK vs. ALAB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ADSK and ALAB, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ADSK dominates in value with a market cap of 62.67 billion USD, eclipsing ALAB’s 15.20 billion USD by roughly 4.12×.
ADSK’s beta of 1.47 points to much larger expected swings compared to ALAB’s calmer 0.33, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.
Symbol | ADSK | ALAB |
---|---|---|
Company Name | Autodesk, Inc. | Astera Labs, Inc. Common Stock |
Country | US | US |
Sector | Technology | Technology |
Industry | Software - Application | Semiconductors |
CEO | Dr. Andrew Anagnost Ph.D. | Mr. Jitendra Mohan |
Price | 292.93 USD | 92.17 USD |
Market Cap | 62.67 billion USD | 15.20 billion USD |
Beta | 1.47 | 0.33 |
Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
IPO Date | June 28, 1985 | March 20, 2024 |
ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ADSK and ALAB over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ADSK and ALAB based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- ALAB features a high P/E of 363.38, indicating strong growth expectations, compared to ADSK at 56.64, which trades at a more standard valuation based on its current earnings.
Symbol | ADSK | ALAB |
---|---|---|
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 56.64 | 363.38 |
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 4.08 | 10.90 |
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 10.22 | 30.99 |
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 24.03 | 14.44 |
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 39.99 | 140.53 |
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 41.48 | -832.77 |
EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 10.38 | 30.81 |
EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 40.61 | 139.73 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither ADSK nor ALAB currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.
Symbol | ADSK | ALAB |
---|---|---|
Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ADSK and ALAB, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- ADSK’s current ratio of 0.68 signals a possible liquidity squeeze, while ALAB at 13.92 comfortably covers its short-term obligations.
- ADSK’s quick ratio of 0.68 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas ALAB at 13.26 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
- Neither ADSK nor ALAB records interest coverage (both “--”), indicating virtually no interest expense—usually a sign of negligible debt.
Symbol | ADSK | ALAB |
---|---|---|
Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.68 | 13.92 |
Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.68 | 13.26 |
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.98 | 0.00 |
Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.24 | 0.00 |
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | -- |