Seek Returns logo

ADM vs. UL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ADM and UL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

UL’s market capitalization of 150.76 billion USD is significantly greater than ADM’s 26.57 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

ADM’s beta of 0.66 points to significantly higher volatility compared to UL (beta: 0.22), suggesting ADM has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

UL is an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), allowing U.S. investors direct exposure to its non-U.S. operations. ADM, on the other hand, is a domestic entity.

SymbolADMUL
Company NameArcher-Daniels-Midland CompanyUnilever PLC
CountryUSGB
SectorConsumer DefensiveConsumer Defensive
IndustryAgricultural Farm ProductsHousehold & Personal Products
CEOJuan Ricardo LucianoFernando Fernandez
Price55.31 USD61.37 USD
Market Cap26.57 billion USD150.76 billion USD
Beta0.660.22
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateMarch 17, 1980March 25, 1980
ADRNoYes

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ADM and UL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ADM vs. UL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ADM

6.18%

Agricultural Farm Products Industry

Max
19.53%
Q3
12.40%
Median
7.41%
Q1
5.58%
Min
4.52%

ADM’s Return on Equity of 6.18% is on par with the norm for the Agricultural Farm Products industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

UL

28.51%

Household & Personal Products Industry

Max
38.00%
Q3
32.25%
Median
24.06%
Q1
4.84%
Min
-18.42%

UL’s Return on Equity of 28.51% is on par with the norm for the Household & Personal Products industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ADM vs. UL: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Agricultural Farm Products and Household & Personal Products industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ADM

3.42%

Agricultural Farm Products Industry

Max
15.58%
Q3
9.63%
Median
5.28%
Q1
3.56%
Min
1.71%

ADM’s Return on Invested Capital of 3.42% is in the lower quartile for the Agricultural Farm Products industry. This indicates a less efficient conversion of invested capital into profit compared to most of its competitors.

UL

11.12%

Household & Personal Products Industry

Max
34.47%
Q3
21.03%
Median
9.28%
Q1
3.66%
Min
-4.23%

UL’s Return on Invested Capital of 11.12% is in line with the norm for the Household & Personal Products industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

ADM vs. UL: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Agricultural Farm Products and Household & Personal Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ADM

1.63%

Agricultural Farm Products Industry

Max
8.26%
Q3
6.13%
Median
3.22%
Q1
1.67%
Min
1.12%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Agricultural Farm Products industry, ADM’s Net Profit Margin of 1.63% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

UL

9.45%

Household & Personal Products Industry

Max
20.09%
Q3
12.77%
Median
8.06%
Q1
3.36%
Min
-6.60%

UL’s Net Profit Margin of 9.45% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Household & Personal Products industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ADM vs. UL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Agricultural Farm Products and Household & Personal Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ADM

1.92%

Agricultural Farm Products Industry

Max
9.85%
Q3
8.83%
Median
4.47%
Q1
2.84%
Min
0.72%

ADM’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.92% is in the lower quartile for the Agricultural Farm Products industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

UL

15.47%

Household & Personal Products Industry

Max
33.32%
Q3
16.82%
Median
10.84%
Q1
5.76%
Min
-4.25%

UL’s Operating Profit Margin of 15.47% is around the midpoint for the Household & Personal Products industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ADM vs. UL: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Agricultural Farm Products and Household & Personal Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolADMUL
Return on Equity (TTM)6.18%28.51%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.56%7.20%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)3.42%11.12%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)1.63%9.45%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)1.92%15.47%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)6.32%45.05%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ADM

1.38

Agricultural Farm Products Industry

Max
3.86
Q3
2.58
Median
1.98
Q1
1.51
Min
1.26

ADM’s Current Ratio of 1.38 falls into the lower quartile for the Agricultural Farm Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

UL

0.76

Household & Personal Products Industry

Max
3.05
Q3
1.96
Median
1.27
Q1
0.84
Min
0.71

UL’s Current Ratio of 0.76 falls into the lower quartile for the Household & Personal Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ADM vs. UL: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Agricultural Farm Products and Household & Personal Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ADM

0.56

Agricultural Farm Products Industry

Max
1.00
Q3
0.70
Median
0.53
Q1
0.34
Min
0.07

ADM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.56 is typical for the Agricultural Farm Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

UL

1.53

Household & Personal Products Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
1.78
Median
0.87
Q1
0.40
Min
0.05

UL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.53 is typical for the Household & Personal Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ADM vs. UL: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Agricultural Farm Products and Household & Personal Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ADM

2.31

Agricultural Farm Products Industry

Max
12.12
Q3
9.52
Median
3.38
Q1
2.68
Min
0.95

In the lower quartile for the Agricultural Farm Products industry, ADM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.31 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

UL

--

Household & Personal Products Industry

Max
21.84
Q3
12.04
Median
3.71
Q1
1.13
Min
-1.74

Interest Coverage Ratio data for UL is currently unavailable.

ADM vs. UL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Agricultural Farm Products and Household & Personal Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolADMUL
Current Ratio (TTM)1.380.76
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.810.56
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.561.53
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.230.38
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)3.242.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.31--

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ADM and UL. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ADM vs. UL: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ADM vs. UL: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ADM vs. UL: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ADM

3.65%

Agricultural Farm Products Industry

Max
7.76%
Q3
5.34%
Median
3.60%
Q1
2.88%
Min
0.00%

ADM’s Dividend Yield of 3.65% is consistent with its peers in the Agricultural Farm Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

UL

3.20%

Household & Personal Products Industry

Max
5.15%
Q3
3.16%
Median
2.31%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.20%, UL offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Household & Personal Products industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

ADM vs. UL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Agricultural Farm Products and Household & Personal Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ADM

71.38%

Agricultural Farm Products Industry

Max
75.60%
Q3
52.87%
Median
34.22%
Q1
33.38%
Min
0.00%

ADM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 71.38% is in the upper quartile for the Agricultural Farm Products industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

UL

75.19%

Household & Personal Products Industry

Max
147.82%
Q3
68.54%
Median
51.42%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 75.19% is in the upper quartile for the Household & Personal Products industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

ADM vs. UL: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Agricultural Farm Products and Household & Personal Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolADMUL
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.65%3.20%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)71.38%75.19%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ADM

19.56

Agricultural Farm Products Industry

Max
33.52
Q3
20.70
Median
16.17
Q1
10.00
Min
4.88

ADM’s P/E Ratio of 19.56 is within the middle range for the Agricultural Farm Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

UL

22.67

Household & Personal Products Industry

Max
66.72
Q3
42.49
Median
24.63
Q1
20.39
Min
5.23

UL’s P/E Ratio of 22.67 is within the middle range for the Household & Personal Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ADM vs. UL: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Agricultural Farm Products and Household & Personal Products industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ADM

2.10

Agricultural Farm Products Industry

Max
1.93
Q3
1.81
Median
1.54
Q1
1.32
Min
0.67

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Agricultural Farm Products industry.

UL

4.29

Household & Personal Products Industry

Max
5.42
Q3
4.43
Median
2.84
Q1
1.79
Min
0.43

UL’s Forward PEG Ratio of 4.29 is within the middle range of its peers in the Household & Personal Products industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

ADM vs. UL: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Agricultural Farm Products and Household & Personal Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ADM

0.32

Agricultural Farm Products Industry

Max
2.89
Q3
1.43
Median
0.36
Q1
0.25
Min
0.01

ADM’s P/S Ratio of 0.32 aligns with the market consensus for the Agricultural Farm Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

UL

2.11

Household & Personal Products Industry

Max
5.97
Q3
4.00
Median
2.38
Q1
0.63
Min
0.24

UL’s P/S Ratio of 2.11 aligns with the market consensus for the Household & Personal Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ADM vs. UL: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Agricultural Farm Products and Household & Personal Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ADM

1.21

Agricultural Farm Products Industry

Max
3.19
Q3
1.88
Median
1.10
Q1
0.99
Min
0.77

ADM’s P/B Ratio of 1.21 is within the conventional range for the Agricultural Farm Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

UL

6.51

Household & Personal Products Industry

Max
38.54
Q3
20.07
Median
6.47
Q1
0.97
Min
0.38

UL’s P/B Ratio of 6.51 is within the conventional range for the Household & Personal Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ADM vs. UL: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Agricultural Farm Products and Household & Personal Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolADMUL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)19.5622.67
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)2.104.29
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)0.322.11
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)1.216.51
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)118.6316.47
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)10.6812.43
EV-to-Sales (TTM)0.452.51