Seek Returns logo

ADM vs. MNST: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ADM and MNST, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolADMMNST
Company NameArcher-Daniels-Midland CompanyMonster Beverage Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryFood ProductsBeverages
Market Capitalization30.23 billion USD61.36 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980December 9, 1985
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ADM and MNST by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ADM vs. MNST: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolADMMNST
5-Day Price Return5.45%-2.00%
13-Week Price Return30.27%-0.41%
26-Week Price Return37.05%23.10%
52-Week Price Return6.25%33.67%
Month-to-Date Return16.13%6.96%
Year-to-Date Return24.54%19.56%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.87M5.45M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.48M5.77M
3-Month Volatility26.92%23.15%
Beta0.710.54

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ADM

4.96%

Food Products Industry

Max
27.15%
Q3
15.66%
Median
10.47%
Q1
7.82%
Min
-2.46%

ADM’s Return on Equity of 4.96% is in the lower quartile for the Food Products industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

MNST

24.73%

Beverages Industry

Max
49.46%
Q3
24.91%
Median
11.13%
Q1
5.27%
Min
-5.93%

MNST’s Return on Equity of 24.73% is on par with the norm for the Beverages industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ADM vs. MNST: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ADM

1.33%

Food Products Industry

Max
18.44%
Q3
9.92%
Median
6.38%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-0.92%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Food Products industry, ADM’s Net Profit Margin of 1.33% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

MNST

20.54%

Beverages Industry

Max
21.86%
Q3
12.24%
Median
8.70%
Q1
5.33%
Min
-4.40%

A Net Profit Margin of 20.54% places MNST in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ADM vs. MNST: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ADM

0.85%

Food Products Industry

Max
24.83%
Q3
14.27%
Median
9.73%
Q1
6.26%
Min
-0.10%

ADM’s Operating Profit Margin of 0.85% is in the lower quartile for the Food Products industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

MNST

26.93%

Beverages Industry

Max
29.32%
Q3
18.25%
Median
13.42%
Q1
10.58%
Min
0.71%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.93% places MNST in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ADM vs. MNST: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolADMMNST
Return on Equity (TTM)4.96%24.73%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.08%19.23%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)1.33%20.54%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)0.85%26.93%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)6.37%55.18%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ADM

1.42

Food Products Industry

Max
3.80
Q3
2.40
Median
1.61
Q1
1.28
Min
0.55

ADM’s Current Ratio of 1.42 aligns with the median group of the Food Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MNST

3.52

Beverages Industry

Max
3.38
Q3
1.97
Median
1.21
Q1
0.86
Min
0.53

MNST’s Current Ratio of 3.52 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Beverages industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

ADM vs. MNST: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Food Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ADM

0.41

Food Products Industry

Max
1.87
Q3
0.90
Median
0.48
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

ADM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.41 is typical for the Food Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MNST

0.00

Beverages Industry

Max
2.11
Q3
1.23
Median
0.79
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Beverages industry, MNST’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

ADM vs. MNST: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Food Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ADM

22.44

Food Products Industry

Max
70.39
Q3
32.08
Median
9.51
Q1
4.55
Min
-1.69

ADM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 22.44 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Food Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MNST

123.81

Beverages Industry

Max
78.96
Q3
40.67
Median
9.62
Q1
3.59
Min
0.81

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 123.81, MNST demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Beverages industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

ADM vs. MNST: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolADMMNST
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.423.52
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.882.86
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.410.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)22.44123.81

Growth

Revenue Growth

ADM vs. MNST: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ADM vs. MNST: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ADM

3.37%

Food Products Industry

Max
7.43%
Q3
4.12%
Median
2.67%
Q1
1.57%
Min
0.00%

ADM’s Dividend Yield of 3.37% is consistent with its peers in the Food Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MNST

0.00%

Beverages Industry

Max
6.93%
Q3
4.51%
Median
3.09%
Q1
2.03%
Min
0.00%

MNST currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ADM vs. MNST: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ADM

88.90%

Food Products Industry

Max
202.50%
Q3
109.53%
Median
67.28%
Q1
39.33%
Min
0.00%

ADM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 88.90% is within the typical range for the Food Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MNST

0.00%

Beverages Industry

Max
143.36%
Q3
99.22%
Median
67.03%
Q1
40.31%
Min
0.00%

MNST has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ADM vs. MNST: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolADMMNST
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.37%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)88.90%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ADM

26.37

Food Products Industry

Max
35.81
Q3
22.88
Median
17.13
Q1
13.91
Min
2.77

A P/E Ratio of 26.37 places ADM in the upper quartile for the Food Products industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

MNST

40.32

Beverages Industry

Max
41.48
Q3
28.35
Median
19.09
Q1
15.36
Min
3.14

A P/E Ratio of 40.32 places MNST in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

ADM vs. MNST: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ADM

0.35

Food Products Industry

Max
3.63
Q3
1.86
Median
1.14
Q1
0.68
Min
0.12

In the lower quartile for the Food Products industry, ADM’s P/S Ratio of 0.35 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

MNST

8.28

Beverages Industry

Max
3.90
Q3
2.38
Median
1.54
Q1
0.84
Min
0.41

With a P/S Ratio of 8.28, MNST trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Beverages industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

ADM vs. MNST: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ADM

1.13

Food Products Industry

Max
5.01
Q3
2.76
Median
1.98
Q1
1.26
Min
0.52

ADM’s P/B Ratio of 1.13 is in the lower quartile for the Food Products industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

MNST

8.49

Beverages Industry

Max
6.29
Q3
3.58
Median
2.19
Q1
1.68
Min
0.91

At 8.49, MNST’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Beverages industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ADM vs. MNST: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Food Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolADMMNST
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)26.3740.32
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.358.28
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.138.49
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)5.9034.20