Seek Returns logo

ADM vs. EL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ADM and EL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolADMEL
Company NameArcher-Daniels-Midland CompanyThe Estée Lauder Companies Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryFood ProductsPersonal Care Products
Market Capitalization30.85 billion USD31.91 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980November 17, 1995
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ADM and EL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ADM vs. EL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolADMEL
5-Day Price Return7.09%-1.32%
13-Week Price Return33.88%37.66%
26-Week Price Return39.47%24.20%
52-Week Price Return8.37%-3.02%
Month-to-Date Return18.51%-4.99%
Year-to-Date Return27.10%18.27%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.90M5.45M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.49M4.13M
3-Month Volatility25.86%45.06%
Beta0.711.16

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ADM

4.96%

Food Products Industry

Max
27.15%
Q3
15.66%
Median
10.47%
Q1
7.82%
Min
-2.46%

ADM’s Return on Equity of 4.96% is in the lower quartile for the Food Products industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

EL

-18.42%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
31.59%
Q3
20.42%
Median
11.01%
Q1
3.26%
Min
-18.42%

EL has a negative Return on Equity of -18.42%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

ADM vs. EL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ADM

1.33%

Food Products Industry

Max
18.44%
Q3
9.92%
Median
6.38%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-0.92%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Food Products industry, ADM’s Net Profit Margin of 1.33% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

EL

-5.89%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
15.12%
Q3
12.06%
Median
9.26%
Q1
5.50%
Min
-0.40%

EL has a negative Net Profit Margin of -5.89%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

ADM vs. EL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ADM

0.85%

Food Products Industry

Max
24.83%
Q3
14.27%
Median
9.73%
Q1
6.26%
Min
-0.10%

ADM’s Operating Profit Margin of 0.85% is in the lower quartile for the Food Products industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

EL

-4.25%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
19.80%
Q3
17.96%
Median
13.14%
Q1
7.58%
Min
-4.25%

EL has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -4.25%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

ADM vs. EL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolADMEL
Return on Equity (TTM)4.96%-18.42%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.08%-4.22%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)1.33%-5.89%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)0.85%-4.25%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)6.37%73.85%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ADM

1.42

Food Products Industry

Max
3.80
Q3
2.40
Median
1.61
Q1
1.28
Min
0.55

ADM’s Current Ratio of 1.42 aligns with the median group of the Food Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

EL

1.41

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.26
Q3
2.61
Median
1.74
Q1
1.13
Min
0.76

EL’s Current Ratio of 1.41 aligns with the median group of the Personal Care Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ADM vs. EL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Food Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ADM

0.41

Food Products Industry

Max
1.87
Q3
0.90
Median
0.48
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

ADM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.41 is typical for the Food Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

EL

1.68

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
1.13
Q3
0.63
Median
0.26
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.68, EL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Personal Care Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

ADM vs. EL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Food Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ADM

22.44

Food Products Industry

Max
70.39
Q3
32.08
Median
9.51
Q1
4.55
Min
-1.69

ADM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 22.44 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Food Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

EL

4.66

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
96.53
Q3
59.91
Median
22.25
Q1
7.85
Min
-1.93

In the lower quartile for the Personal Care Products industry, EL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.66 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

ADM vs. EL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolADMEL
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.421.41
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.880.89
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.411.68
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)22.444.66

Growth

Revenue Growth

ADM vs. EL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ADM vs. EL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ADM

3.37%

Food Products Industry

Max
7.43%
Q3
4.12%
Median
2.67%
Q1
1.57%
Min
0.00%

ADM’s Dividend Yield of 3.37% is consistent with its peers in the Food Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

EL

2.29%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.08%
Q3
2.46%
Median
1.82%
Q1
0.83%
Min
0.00%

EL’s Dividend Yield of 2.29% is consistent with its peers in the Personal Care Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ADM vs. EL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ADM

88.90%

Food Products Industry

Max
202.50%
Q3
109.53%
Median
67.28%
Q1
39.33%
Min
0.00%

ADM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 88.90% is within the typical range for the Food Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

EL

79.25%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
207.61%
Q3
115.17%
Median
69.37%
Q1
47.71%
Min
0.00%

EL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 79.25% is within the typical range for the Personal Care Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ADM vs. EL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolADMEL
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.37%2.29%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)88.90%79.25%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ADM

26.37

Food Products Industry

Max
35.81
Q3
22.88
Median
17.13
Q1
13.91
Min
2.77

A P/E Ratio of 26.37 places ADM in the upper quartile for the Food Products industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

EL

--

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
55.49
Q3
36.75
Median
26.49
Q1
22.40
Min
11.12

P/E Ratio data for EL is currently unavailable.

ADM vs. EL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ADM

0.35

Food Products Industry

Max
3.63
Q3
1.86
Median
1.14
Q1
0.68
Min
0.12

In the lower quartile for the Food Products industry, ADM’s P/S Ratio of 0.35 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

EL

2.15

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
5.35
Q3
2.83
Median
2.07
Q1
1.13
Min
0.00

EL’s P/S Ratio of 2.15 aligns with the market consensus for the Personal Care Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ADM vs. EL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ADM

1.13

Food Products Industry

Max
5.01
Q3
2.76
Median
1.98
Q1
1.26
Min
0.52

ADM’s P/B Ratio of 1.13 is in the lower quartile for the Food Products industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

EL

5.46

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
7.32
Q3
5.26
Median
2.93
Q1
1.84
Min
1.14

EL’s P/B Ratio of 5.46 is in the upper tier for the Personal Care Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

ADM vs. EL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Food Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolADMEL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)26.37--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.352.15
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.135.46
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)5.9018.10