ACN vs. VRSN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ACN and VRSN, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ACN dominates in value with a market cap of 198.90 billion USD, eclipsing VRSN’s 26.39 billion USD by roughly 7.54×.
ACN’s beta of 1.34 points to much larger expected swings compared to VRSN’s calmer 0.80, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.
| Symbol | ACN | VRSN |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Accenture plc | VeriSign, Inc. |
| Country | IE | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Software - Infrastructure |
| CEO | Ms. Julie T. Spellman Sweet J.D. | Mr. D. James Bidzos |
| Price | 317.72 USD | 281.08 USD |
| Market Cap | 198.90 billion USD | 26.39 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.34 | 0.80 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | July 19, 2001 | January 30, 1998 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ACN and VRSN over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ACN and VRSN based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- VRSN shows a negative forward PEG of -0.34, signaling expected earnings contraction, while ACN at 2.75 maintains analysts’ projections for stable or improved profits.
- VRSN carries a sub-zero price-to-book ratio of -18.93, indicating negative equity. In contrast, ACN (P/B 6.81) has positive book value.
| Symbol | ACN | VRSN |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 25.92 | 33.62 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.75 | -0.34 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 2.96 | 16.75 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 6.81 | -18.93 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 20.41 | 29.12 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 16.76 | 24.24 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 2.95 | 17.53 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 20.36 | 30.46 |
Dividend Comparison
ACN’s dividend yield of 1.80% is about 558% higher than VRSN’s 0.27%, underscoring its stronger focus on returning cash to shareholders.
| Symbol | ACN | VRSN |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.80% | 0.27% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ACN and VRSN, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- VRSN’s current ratio of 0.56 indicates its assets may not cover near-term debts, whereas ACN at 1.48 maintains healthy liquidity.
- VRSN posts a quick ratio of 0.56, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while ACN at 1.48 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
- VRSN has negative equity (debt-to-equity ratio -1.28), suggesting asset shortfalls, whereas ACN at 0.28 preserves healthier equity coverage.
- VRSN carries a debt-to-assets ratio of 1.24, suggesting substantial asset funding via debt, while ACN at 0.13 opts for a more conservative financing structure.
| Symbol | ACN | VRSN |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.48 | 0.56 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.48 | 0.56 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.28 | -1.28 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.13 | 1.24 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 79.65 | 13.94 |