ACN vs. MSTR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ACN and MSTR, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ACN dominates in value with a market cap of 198.90 billion USD, eclipsing MSTR’s 110.10 billion USD by roughly 1.81×.
MSTR carries a higher beta at 3.81, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while ACN remains steadier at 1.34.
| Symbol | ACN | MSTR |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Accenture plc | MicroStrategy Incorporated |
| Country | IE | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Software - Application |
| CEO | Ms. Julie T. Spellman Sweet J.D. | Mr. Phong Q. Le |
| Price | 317.72 USD | 402.69 USD |
| Market Cap | 198.90 billion USD | 110.10 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.34 | 3.81 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | July 19, 2001 | June 11, 1998 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ACN and MSTR over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ACN and MSTR based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- MSTR shows a negative P/E of -19.34, highlighting a year of losses, whereas ACN at 25.92 trades on solid profitability.
- MSTR reports a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -5.36, showing a cash flow shortfall that could threaten its operational sustainability, while ACN at 20.41 maintains positive cash flow.
| Symbol | ACN | MSTR |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 25.92 | -19.34 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.75 | 0.07 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 2.96 | 239.72 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 6.81 | 79.17 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 20.41 | -5.36 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 16.76 | -14.54 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 2.95 | 239.82 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 20.36 | -5.37 |
Dividend Comparison
ACN delivers a 1.80% dividend yield, blending income with growth, whereas MSTR appears to retain its profits, possibly to fund operations, R&D, or other growth initiatives.
| Symbol | ACN | MSTR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.80% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ACN and MSTR, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- MSTR’s current ratio of 0.66 indicates its assets may not cover near-term debts, whereas ACN at 1.48 maintains healthy liquidity.
- MSTR posts a quick ratio of 0.66, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while ACN at 1.48 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
- ACN meets its interest obligations (ratio 79.65). In stark contrast, MSTR’s negative ratio (-229.74) means its operating earnings (EBIT) don't cover basic operations, let alone interest, signaling serious financial trouble.
| Symbol | ACN | MSTR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.48 | 0.66 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.48 | 0.66 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.28 | 0.08 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.13 | 0.00 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 79.65 | -229.74 |