Seek Returns logo

ACM vs. DRS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ACM and DRS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

ACM’s market capitalization stands at 15.31 billion USD, while DRS’s is 12.35 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.

ACM’s beta of 0.97 points to significantly higher volatility compared to DRS (beta: 0.25), suggesting ACM has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

SymbolACMDRS
Company NameAecomLeonardo DRS, Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
IndustryEngineering & ConstructionAerospace & Defense
CEOW. Troy RuddWilliam J. Lynn III,
Price115.75 USD46.41 USD
Market Cap15.31 billion USD12.35 billion USD
Beta0.970.25
ExchangeNYSENASDAQ
IPO DateMay 10, 2007June 24, 1985
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ACM and DRS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ACM vs. DRS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ACM

27.52%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
39.77%
Q3
28.08%
Median
13.64%
Q1
7.13%
Min
-14.48%

ACM’s Return on Equity of 27.52% is on par with the norm for the Engineering & Construction industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

DRS

9.35%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
42.57%
Q3
16.67%
Median
8.39%
Q1
-0.77%
Min
-23.36%

DRS’s Return on Equity of 9.35% is on par with the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ACM vs. DRS: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Engineering & Construction and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ACM

6.55%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
22.01%
Q3
12.65%
Median
8.09%
Q1
4.79%
Min
-2.53%

ACM’s Return on Invested Capital of 6.55% is in line with the norm for the Engineering & Construction industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

DRS

8.27%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
23.42%
Q3
8.86%
Median
5.47%
Q1
-5.60%
Min
-22.46%

DRS’s Return on Invested Capital of 8.27% is in line with the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

ACM vs. DRS: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Engineering & Construction and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ACM

3.85%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
11.23%
Q3
6.47%
Median
3.96%
Q1
2.79%
Min
-2.45%

ACM’s Net Profit Margin of 3.85% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Engineering & Construction industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

DRS

7.00%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
22.67%
Q3
8.04%
Median
4.95%
Q1
-5.07%
Min
-16.58%

DRS’s Net Profit Margin of 7.00% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ACM vs. DRS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Engineering & Construction and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ACM

5.98%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
13.74%
Q3
8.50%
Median
6.20%
Q1
4.58%
Min
0.34%

ACM’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.98% is around the midpoint for the Engineering & Construction industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

DRS

9.33%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
22.01%
Q3
11.49%
Median
8.96%
Q1
3.77%
Min
-4.96%

DRS’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.33% is around the midpoint for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ACM vs. DRS: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Engineering & Construction and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolACMDRS
Return on Equity (TTM)27.52%9.35%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.24%5.71%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)6.55%8.27%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.85%7.00%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)5.98%9.33%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)7.09%22.66%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ACM

--

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
2.02
Q3
1.66
Median
1.38
Q1
1.24
Min
0.94

Current Ratio data for ACM is currently unavailable.

DRS

2.02

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
5.13
Q3
3.36
Median
2.16
Q1
1.20
Min
0.41

DRS’s Current Ratio of 2.02 aligns with the median group of the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ACM vs. DRS: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ACM

1.32

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
1.76
Q3
0.91
Median
0.67
Q1
0.28
Min
0.01

ACM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Engineering & Construction industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.32. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

DRS

0.18

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
1.20
Q3
0.73
Median
0.51
Q1
0.09
Min
0.00

DRS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.18 is typical for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ACM vs. DRS: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ACM

5.28

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
20.20
Q3
11.91
Median
6.46
Q1
3.18
Min
-2.69

ACM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.28 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Engineering & Construction industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

DRS

19.50

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
12.62
Q3
7.38
Median
2.95
Q1
1.68
Min
-6.68

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 19.50, DRS demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

ACM vs. DRS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Engineering & Construction and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolACMDRS
Current Ratio (TTM)--2.02
Quick Ratio (TTM)--1.64
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)1.320.18
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.260.11
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)1.230.18
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.2819.50

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ACM and DRS. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ACM vs. DRS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ACM vs. DRS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ACM vs. DRS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ACM

0.86%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
1.31%
Q3
0.40%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 0.86%, ACM offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Engineering & Construction industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

DRS

0.19%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
6.00%
Q3
0.66%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

DRS’s Dividend Yield of 0.19% is consistent with its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ACM vs. DRS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Engineering & Construction and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ACM

20.16%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
32.30%
Q3
7.09%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ACM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 20.16% is in the upper quartile for the Engineering & Construction industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

DRS

10.26%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
172.02%
Q3
32.47%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

DRS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 10.26% is within the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ACM vs. DRS: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolACMDRS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.86%0.19%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)20.16%10.26%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ACM

24.84

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
95.41
Q3
56.70
Median
32.28
Q1
22.94
Min
4.72

ACM’s P/E Ratio of 24.84 is within the middle range for the Engineering & Construction industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

DRS

52.62

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
75.34
Q3
54.40
Median
38.63
Q1
26.10
Min
16.44

DRS’s P/E Ratio of 52.62 is within the middle range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ACM vs. DRS: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ACM

2.51

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
4.99
Q3
3.64
Median
2.51
Q1
1.64
Min
0.03

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Engineering & Construction industry.

DRS

6.95

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
10.68
Q3
5.36
Median
2.31
Q1
1.47
Min
0.01

A Forward PEG Ratio of 6.95 places DRS in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests the stock is potentially expensive compared to its peers relative to its growth forecast, which may warrant caution.

ACM vs. DRS: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ACM

0.95

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
3.34
Q3
2.05
Median
1.50
Q1
0.83
Min
0.44

ACM’s P/S Ratio of 0.95 aligns with the market consensus for the Engineering & Construction industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

DRS

3.69

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
19.34
Q3
9.54
Median
2.71
Q1
1.59
Min
0.35

DRS’s P/S Ratio of 3.69 aligns with the market consensus for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ACM vs. DRS: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ACM

6.71

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
10.70
Q3
7.33
Median
4.69
Q1
2.53
Min
0.79

ACM’s P/B Ratio of 6.71 is within the conventional range for the Engineering & Construction industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

DRS

4.79

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
16.08
Q3
8.12
Median
4.12
Q1
2.69
Min
0.69

DRS’s P/B Ratio of 4.79 is within the conventional range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ACM vs. DRS: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Engineering & Construction and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolACMDRS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)24.8452.62
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)2.516.95
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)0.953.69
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)6.714.79
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)18.3142.43
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)14.5131.52
EV-to-Sales (TTM)1.043.71