Seek Returns logo

ABT vs. RMD: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ABT and RMD, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

ABT’s market capitalization of 233.90 billion USD is substantially larger than RMD’s 37.68 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

With betas of 0.74 for ABT and 0.77 for RMD, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolABTRMD
Company NameAbbott LaboratoriesResMed Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorHealthcareHealthcare
IndustryMedical - DevicesMedical - Instruments & Supplies
CEORobert B. FordMichael J. Farrell BE, MBA, SM
Price134.44 USD256.96 USD
Market Cap233.90 billion USD37.68 billion USD
Beta0.740.77
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateMarch 17, 1980June 2, 1995
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ABT and RMD by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ABT vs. RMD: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ABT

30.76%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
49.04%
Q3
9.53%
Median
-7.46%
Q1
-32.83%
Min
-82.64%

In the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, ABT’s Return on Equity of 30.76% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

RMD

25.18%

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
26.65%
Q3
13.00%
Median
1.08%
Q1
-8.11%
Min
-38.20%

In the upper quartile for the Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry, RMD’s Return on Equity of 25.18% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

ABT vs. RMD: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Medical - Devices and Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ABT

19.13%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
21.88%
Q3
6.63%
Median
-1.11%
Q1
-21.08%
Min
-51.95%

In the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, ABT’s Return on Invested Capital of 19.13% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

RMD

20.14%

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
20.14%
Q3
7.36%
Median
1.97%
Q1
-6.22%
Min
-20.00%

In the upper quartile for the Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry, RMD’s Return on Invested Capital of 20.14% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

ABT vs. RMD: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Medical - Devices and Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ABT

31.89%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
44.80%
Q3
9.77%
Median
-5.53%
Q1
-29.37%
Min
-87.68%

A Net Profit Margin of 31.89% places ABT in the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

RMD

26.15%

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
28.95%
Q3
11.24%
Median
-2.83%
Q1
-12.85%
Min
-26.41%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.15% places RMD in the upper quartile for the Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ABT vs. RMD: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Medical - Devices and Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ABT

16.97%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
30.13%
Q3
13.12%
Median
3.47%
Q1
-24.42%
Min
-80.56%

An Operating Profit Margin of 16.97% places ABT in the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

RMD

32.10%

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
32.10%
Q3
16.03%
Median
2.28%
Q1
-7.96%
Min
-26.84%

An Operating Profit Margin of 32.10% places RMD in the upper quartile for the Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ABT vs. RMD: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Medical - Devices and Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolABTRMD
Return on Equity (TTM)30.76%25.18%
Return on Assets (TTM)16.58%17.36%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)19.13%20.14%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)31.89%26.15%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)16.97%32.10%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)55.89%58.53%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ABT

1.78

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
12.68
Q3
6.30
Median
4.05
Q1
1.85
Min
0.01

ABT’s Current Ratio of 1.78 falls into the lower quartile for the Medical - Devices industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

RMD

3.41

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
6.79
Q3
4.57
Median
2.64
Q1
1.81
Min
1.10

RMD’s Current Ratio of 3.41 aligns with the median group of the Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ABT vs. RMD: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ABT

0.27

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
2.34
Q3
1.09
Median
0.37
Q1
0.08
Min
0.00

ABT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.27 is typical for the Medical - Devices industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

RMD

0.15

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
1.46
Q3
0.74
Median
0.41
Q1
0.16
Min
0.03

Falling into the lower quartile for the Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry, RMD’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.15 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

ABT vs. RMD: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ABT

15.39

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
18.18
Q3
7.53
Median
0.85
Q1
-9.80
Min
-33.94

ABT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 15.39 is in the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

RMD

226.60

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
25.04
Q3
8.80
Median
3.66
Q1
-3.85
Min
-11.93

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 226.60, RMD demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

ABT vs. RMD: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Medical - Devices and Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolABTRMD
Current Ratio (TTM)1.783.41
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.272.49
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.270.15
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.160.11
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.60-0.05
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)15.39226.60

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ABT and RMD. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ABT vs. RMD: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ABT vs. RMD: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ABT vs. RMD: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ABT

1.70%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
3.57%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.70%, ABT offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Medical - Devices industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

RMD

0.83%

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
4.02%
Q3
0.38%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 0.83%, RMD offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

ABT vs. RMD: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Medical - Devices and Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ABT

28.92%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
102.12%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ABT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 28.92% is in the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

RMD

23.14%

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
76.77%
Q3
11.37%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RMD’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 23.14% is in the upper quartile for the Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

ABT vs. RMD: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolABTRMD
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.70%0.83%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)28.92%23.14%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ABT

17.40

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
90.56
Q3
56.92
Median
43.19
Q1
21.79
Min
5.55

In the lower quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, ABT’s P/E Ratio of 17.40 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

RMD

28.71

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
45.65
Q3
44.10
Median
35.47
Q1
29.60
Min
21.65

In the lower quartile for the Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry, RMD’s P/E Ratio of 28.71 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

ABT vs. RMD: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ABT

1.73

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
6.56
Q3
3.52
Median
2.22
Q1
0.55
Min
0.03

ABT’s Forward PEG Ratio of 1.73 is within the middle range of its peers in the Medical - Devices industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

RMD

3.40

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
5.80
Q3
3.68
Median
2.56
Q1
1.87
Min
0.22

RMD’s Forward PEG Ratio of 3.40 is within the middle range of its peers in the Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

ABT vs. RMD: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ABT

5.52

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
15.74
Q3
8.12
Median
3.40
Q1
2.37
Min
0.42

ABT’s P/S Ratio of 5.52 aligns with the market consensus for the Medical - Devices industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

RMD

7.50

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
12.87
Q3
6.95
Median
3.45
Q1
2.24
Min
0.71

RMD’s P/S Ratio of 7.50 is in the upper echelon for the Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ABT vs. RMD: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ABT

4.81

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
16.65
Q3
8.03
Median
3.73
Q1
1.92
Min
0.65

ABT’s P/B Ratio of 4.81 is within the conventional range for the Medical - Devices industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

RMD

6.80

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
9.60
Q3
5.48
Median
3.37
Q1
1.95
Min
0.65

RMD’s P/B Ratio of 6.80 is in the upper tier for the Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

ABT vs. RMD: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolABTRMD
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)17.4028.71
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.733.40
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)5.527.50
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)4.816.80
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)35.1424.09
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)21.4922.04
EV-to-Sales (TTM)5.687.48