Seek Returns logo

ABT vs. MDT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ABT and MDT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

ABT’s market capitalization of 233.90 billion USD is substantially larger than MDT’s 113.25 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

With betas of 0.74 for ABT and 0.81 for MDT, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolABTMDT
Company NameAbbott LaboratoriesMedtronic plc
CountryUSIE
SectorHealthcareHealthcare
IndustryMedical - DevicesMedical - Devices
CEORobert B. FordGeoffrey Straub Martha
Price134.44 USD88.39 USD
Market Cap233.90 billion USD113.25 billion USD
Beta0.740.81
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateMarch 17, 1980May 2, 1973
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ABT and MDT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ABT vs. MDT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ABT

30.76%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
49.04%
Q3
9.53%
Median
-7.46%
Q1
-32.83%
Min
-82.64%

In the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, ABT’s Return on Equity of 30.76% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MDT

9.62%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
49.04%
Q3
9.53%
Median
-7.46%
Q1
-32.83%
Min
-82.64%

In the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, MDT’s Return on Equity of 9.62% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

ABT vs. MDT: A comparison of their ROE against the Medical - Devices industry benchmark.

Return on Invested Capital

ABT

19.13%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
21.88%
Q3
6.63%
Median
-1.11%
Q1
-21.08%
Min
-51.95%

In the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, ABT’s Return on Invested Capital of 19.13% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

MDT

6.08%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
21.88%
Q3
6.63%
Median
-1.11%
Q1
-21.08%
Min
-51.95%

MDT’s Return on Invested Capital of 6.08% is in line with the norm for the Medical - Devices industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

ABT vs. MDT: A comparison of their ROIC against the Medical - Devices industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin

ABT

31.89%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
44.80%
Q3
9.77%
Median
-5.53%
Q1
-29.37%
Min
-87.68%

A Net Profit Margin of 31.89% places ABT in the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MDT

13.90%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
44.80%
Q3
9.77%
Median
-5.53%
Q1
-29.37%
Min
-87.68%

A Net Profit Margin of 13.90% places MDT in the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ABT vs. MDT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against the Medical - Devices industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin

ABT

16.97%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
30.13%
Q3
13.12%
Median
3.47%
Q1
-24.42%
Min
-80.56%

An Operating Profit Margin of 16.97% places ABT in the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MDT

17.76%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
30.13%
Q3
13.12%
Median
3.47%
Q1
-24.42%
Min
-80.56%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.76% places MDT in the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ABT vs. MDT: A comparison of their Operating Margin against the Medical - Devices industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolABTMDT
Return on Equity (TTM)30.76%9.62%
Return on Assets (TTM)16.58%5.09%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)19.13%6.08%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)31.89%13.90%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)16.97%17.76%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)55.89%64.06%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ABT

1.78

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
12.68
Q3
6.30
Median
4.05
Q1
1.85
Min
0.01

ABT’s Current Ratio of 1.78 falls into the lower quartile for the Medical - Devices industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MDT

1.85

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
12.68
Q3
6.30
Median
4.05
Q1
1.85
Min
0.01

MDT’s Current Ratio of 1.85 aligns with the median group of the Medical - Devices industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ABT vs. MDT: A comparison of their Current Ratio against the Medical - Devices industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ABT

0.27

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
2.34
Q3
1.09
Median
0.37
Q1
0.08
Min
0.00

ABT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.27 is typical for the Medical - Devices industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MDT

0.59

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
2.34
Q3
1.09
Median
0.37
Q1
0.08
Min
0.00

MDT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.59 is typical for the Medical - Devices industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ABT vs. MDT: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against the Medical - Devices industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ABT

15.39

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
18.18
Q3
7.53
Median
0.85
Q1
-9.80
Min
-33.94

ABT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 15.39 is in the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

MDT

8.17

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
18.18
Q3
7.53
Median
0.85
Q1
-9.80
Min
-33.94

MDT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.17 is in the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

ABT vs. MDT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against the Medical - Devices industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolABTMDT
Current Ratio (TTM)1.781.85
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.271.42
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.270.59
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.160.31
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.603.16
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)15.398.17

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ABT and MDT. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ABT vs. MDT: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ABT vs. MDT: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ABT vs. MDT: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ABT

1.70%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
3.57%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.70%, ABT offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Medical - Devices industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

MDT

3.18%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
3.57%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.18%, MDT offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Medical - Devices industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

ABT vs. MDT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against the Medical - Devices industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ABT

28.92%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
102.12%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ABT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 28.92% is in the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

MDT

76.97%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
102.12%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MDT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 76.97% is in the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

ABT vs. MDT: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against the Medical - Devices industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolABTMDT
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.70%3.18%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)28.92%76.97%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ABT

17.40

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
90.56
Q3
56.92
Median
43.19
Q1
21.79
Min
5.55

In the lower quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, ABT’s P/E Ratio of 17.40 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

MDT

24.31

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
90.56
Q3
56.92
Median
43.19
Q1
21.79
Min
5.55

MDT’s P/E Ratio of 24.31 is within the middle range for the Medical - Devices industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ABT vs. MDT: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against the Medical - Devices industry benchmark.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ABT

1.73

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
6.56
Q3
3.52
Median
2.22
Q1
0.55
Min
0.03

ABT’s Forward PEG Ratio of 1.73 is within the middle range of its peers in the Medical - Devices industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

MDT

3.03

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
6.56
Q3
3.52
Median
2.22
Q1
0.55
Min
0.03

MDT’s Forward PEG Ratio of 3.03 is within the middle range of its peers in the Medical - Devices industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

ABT vs. MDT: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against the Medical - Devices industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ABT

5.52

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
15.74
Q3
8.12
Median
3.40
Q1
2.37
Min
0.42

ABT’s P/S Ratio of 5.52 aligns with the market consensus for the Medical - Devices industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MDT

3.38

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
15.74
Q3
8.12
Median
3.40
Q1
2.37
Min
0.42

MDT’s P/S Ratio of 3.38 aligns with the market consensus for the Medical - Devices industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ABT vs. MDT: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against the Medical - Devices industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ABT

4.81

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
16.65
Q3
8.03
Median
3.73
Q1
1.92
Min
0.65

ABT’s P/B Ratio of 4.81 is within the conventional range for the Medical - Devices industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MDT

2.36

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
16.65
Q3
8.03
Median
3.73
Q1
1.92
Min
0.65

MDT’s P/B Ratio of 2.36 is within the conventional range for the Medical - Devices industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ABT vs. MDT: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against the Medical - Devices industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolABTMDT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)17.4024.31
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.733.03
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)5.523.38
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)4.812.36
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)35.1421.84
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)21.4916.76
EV-to-Sales (TTM)5.684.16