ABNB vs. RCL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ABNB and RCL, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
With ABNB at 79.88 billion USD and RCL at 64.56 billion USD, their market capitalizations sit in the same ballpark.
RCL carries a higher beta at 2.13, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while ABNB remains steadier at 1.15.
| Symbol | ABNB | RCL |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Airbnb, Inc. | Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Consumer Cyclical |
| Industry | Travel Services | Travel Services |
| CEO | Mr. Brian Chesky | Mr. Jason T. Liberty |
| Price | 127.52 USD | 237.75 USD |
| Market Cap | 79.88 billion USD | 64.56 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.15 | 2.13 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | December 10, 2020 | April 28, 1993 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ABNB and RCL over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between ABNB and RCL, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | ABNB | RCL |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 31.20 | 19.70 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 1.52 | 1.31 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 7.11 | 3.85 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 9.98 | 8.03 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 18.16 | 30.60 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 29.23 | 13.38 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 6.64 | 5.03 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 16.95 | 39.95 |
Dividend Comparison
ABNB offers a 0% dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while RCL provides a 0.72% dividend yield, giving investors a steady income stream.
| Symbol | ABNB | RCL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.72% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ABNB and RCL, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- RCL’s current ratio of 0.18 indicates its assets may not cover near-term debts, whereas ABNB at 1.27 maintains healthy liquidity.
- RCL posts a quick ratio of 0.15, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while ABNB at 1.27 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
- ABNB shows “--” for interest coverage, hinting at negligible interest costs, whereas RCL (at 3.04) covers its interest obligations.
| Symbol | ABNB | RCL |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.27 | 0.18 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.27 | 0.15 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.29 | 2.53 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.09 | 0.54 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 3.04 |