ABNB vs. NCLH: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ABNB and NCLH, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ABNB dominates in value with a market cap of 79.88 billion USD, eclipsing NCLH’s 7.69 billion USD by roughly 10.38×.
NCLH carries a higher beta at 2.10, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while ABNB remains steadier at 1.15.
| Symbol | ABNB | NCLH |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Airbnb, Inc. | Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Consumer Cyclical |
| Industry | Travel Services | Travel Services |
| CEO | Mr. Brian Chesky | Mr. Harry J. Sommer |
| Price | 127.52 USD | 17.22 USD |
| Market Cap | 79.88 billion USD | 7.69 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.15 | 2.10 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | December 10, 2020 | January 18, 2013 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ABNB and NCLH over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ABNB and NCLH based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- NCLH reports a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -13.85, showing a cash flow shortfall that could threaten its operational sustainability, while ABNB at 18.16 maintains positive cash flow.
| Symbol | ABNB | NCLH |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 31.20 | 8.91 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 1.52 | 0.48 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 7.11 | 0.82 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 9.98 | 5.36 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 18.16 | -13.85 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 29.23 | 10.95 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 6.64 | 2.28 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 16.95 | -38.71 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither ABNB nor NCLH currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.
| Symbol | ABNB | NCLH |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ABNB and NCLH, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- NCLH’s current ratio of 0.19 indicates its assets may not cover near-term debts, whereas ABNB at 1.27 maintains healthy liquidity.
- NCLH posts a quick ratio of 0.16, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while ABNB at 1.27 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
- NCLH is highly leveraged (debt-to-equity ratio 9.88), elevating both potential gains and risks, compared to ABNB at 0.29, which maintains a steadier capital structure.
- ABNB shows “--” for interest coverage, hinting at negligible interest costs, whereas NCLH (at 2.76) covers its interest obligations.
| Symbol | ABNB | NCLH |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.27 | 0.19 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.27 | 0.16 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.29 | 9.88 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.09 | 0.66 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 2.76 |