ABNB vs. LVS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ABNB and LVS, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ABNB dominates in value with a market cap of 79.88 billion USD, eclipsing LVS’s 28.48 billion USD by roughly 2.80×.
With betas of 1.15 for ABNB and 0.98 for LVS, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | ABNB | LVS |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Airbnb, Inc. | Las Vegas Sands Corp. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Consumer Cyclical |
| Industry | Travel Services | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos |
| CEO | Mr. Brian Chesky | Mr. Robert Glen Goldstein |
| Price | 127.52 USD | 40.31 USD |
| Market Cap | 79.88 billion USD | 28.48 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.15 | 0.98 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | December 10, 2020 | December 15, 2004 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ABNB and LVS over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between ABNB and LVS, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | ABNB | LVS |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 31.20 | 22.01 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 1.52 | 2.51 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 7.11 | 2.54 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 9.98 | 10.63 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 18.16 | 23.03 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 29.23 | 9.82 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 6.64 | 3.51 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 16.95 | 31.77 |
Dividend Comparison
ABNB offers a 0% dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while LVS provides a 2.23% dividend yield, giving investors a steady income stream.
| Symbol | ABNB | LVS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 2.23% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ABNB and LVS, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- LVS’s current ratio of 0.59 indicates its assets may not cover near-term debts, whereas ABNB at 1.27 maintains healthy liquidity.
- LVS posts a quick ratio of 0.59, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while ABNB at 1.27 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
- LVS is highly leveraged (debt-to-equity ratio 5.13), elevating both potential gains and risks, compared to ABNB at 0.29, which maintains a steadier capital structure.
- ABNB shows “--” for interest coverage, hinting at negligible interest costs, whereas LVS (at 3.22) covers its interest obligations.
| Symbol | ABNB | LVS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.27 | 0.59 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.27 | 0.59 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.29 | 5.13 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.09 | 0.65 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 3.22 |