ABNB vs. JPM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ABNB and JPM, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
JPM stands out with 725.45 billion USD in market value—about 9.08× ABNB’s market cap of 79.88 billion USD.
With betas of 1.15 for ABNB and 1.07 for JPM, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | ABNB | JPM |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Airbnb, Inc. | JPMorgan Chase & Co. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Financial Services |
| Industry | Travel Services | Banks - Diversified |
| CEO | Mr. Brian Chesky | Mr. James Dimon |
| Price | 127.52 USD | 261.04 USD |
| Market Cap | 79.88 billion USD | 725.45 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.15 | 1.07 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | December 10, 2020 | March 17, 1980 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ABNB and JPM over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ABNB and JPM based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- JPM reports a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -122.34, showing a cash flow shortfall that could threaten its operational sustainability, while ABNB at 18.16 maintains positive cash flow.
| Symbol | ABNB | JPM |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 31.20 | 12.33 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 1.52 | 1.79 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 7.11 | 3.55 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 9.98 | 2.09 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 18.16 | -122.34 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 29.23 | 15.68 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 6.64 | 6.38 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 16.95 | -220.03 |
Dividend Comparison
ABNB offers a 0% dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while JPM provides a 1.93% dividend yield, giving investors a steady income stream.
| Symbol | ABNB | JPM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 1.93% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ABNB and JPM, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- JPM’s current ratio of 0.58 indicates its assets may not cover near-term debts, whereas ABNB at 1.27 maintains healthy liquidity.
- JPM posts a quick ratio of 0.58, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while ABNB at 1.27 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
- ABNB shows “--” for interest coverage, hinting at negligible interest costs, whereas JPM (at 1.34) covers its interest obligations.
| Symbol | ABNB | JPM |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.27 | 0.58 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.27 | 0.58 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.29 | 2.86 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.09 | 0.23 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 1.34 |