ABNB vs. EAT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ABNB and EAT, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ABNB dominates in value with a market cap of 79.88 billion USD, eclipsing EAT’s 6.40 billion USD by roughly 12.49×.
With betas of 1.15 for ABNB and 1.66 for EAT, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | ABNB | EAT |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Airbnb, Inc. | Brinker International, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Consumer Cyclical |
| Industry | Travel Services | Restaurants |
| CEO | Mr. Brian Chesky | Mr. Kevin D. Hochman |
| Price | 127.52 USD | 143.87 USD |
| Market Cap | 79.88 billion USD | 6.40 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.15 | 1.66 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | December 10, 2020 | January 6, 1984 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ABNB and EAT over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between ABNB and EAT, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | ABNB | EAT |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 31.20 | 19.16 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 1.52 | 1.65 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 7.11 | 1.25 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 9.98 | 24.66 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 18.16 | 16.35 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 29.23 | 12.28 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 6.64 | 1.58 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 16.95 | 20.75 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither ABNB nor EAT currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.
| Symbol | ABNB | EAT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ABNB and EAT, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- EAT’s current ratio of 0.28 indicates its assets may not cover near-term debts, whereas ABNB at 1.27 maintains healthy liquidity.
- EAT posts a quick ratio of 0.23, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while ABNB at 1.27 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
- EAT is highly leveraged (debt-to-equity ratio 6.64), elevating both potential gains and risks, compared to ABNB at 0.29, which maintains a steadier capital structure.
- ABNB shows “--” for interest coverage, hinting at negligible interest costs, whereas EAT (at 8.13) covers its interest obligations.
| Symbol | ABNB | EAT |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.27 | 0.28 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.27 | 0.23 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.29 | 6.64 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.09 | 0.67 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 8.13 |