ABNB vs. BA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ABNB and BA, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
BA stands out with 153.22 billion USD in market value—about 1.92× ABNB’s market cap of 79.88 billion USD.
With betas of 1.15 for ABNB and 1.41 for BA, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | ABNB | BA |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Airbnb, Inc. | The Boeing Company |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Industrials |
| Industry | Travel Services | Aerospace & Defense |
| CEO | Mr. Brian Chesky | Mr. Robert K. Ortberg |
| Price | 127.52 USD | 203.21 USD |
| Market Cap | 79.88 billion USD | 153.22 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.15 | 1.41 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | December 10, 2020 | January 2, 1962 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ABNB and BA over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ABNB and BA based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- BA shows a negative P/E of -13.30, highlighting a year of losses, whereas ABNB at 31.20 trades on solid profitability.
- BA shows a negative forward PEG of -6.09, signaling expected earnings contraction, while ABNB at 1.52 maintains analysts’ projections for stable or improved profits.
- BA carries a sub-zero price-to-book ratio of -46.04, indicating negative equity. In contrast, ABNB (P/B 9.98) has positive book value.
- BA reports a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -12.01, showing a cash flow shortfall that could threaten its operational sustainability, while ABNB at 18.16 maintains positive cash flow.
| Symbol | ABNB | BA |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 31.20 | -13.30 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 1.52 | -6.09 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 7.11 | 2.21 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 9.98 | -46.04 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 18.16 | -12.01 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 29.23 | -27.97 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 6.64 | 2.83 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 16.95 | -15.42 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither ABNB nor BA currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.
| Symbol | ABNB | BA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ABNB and BA, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- BA posts a quick ratio of 0.37, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while ABNB at 1.27 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
- BA has negative equity (debt-to-equity ratio -16.13), suggesting asset shortfalls, whereas ABNB at 0.29 preserves healthier equity coverage.
- ABNB shows “--” (minimal interest expense), but BA is in the red with interest coverage -3.55, signaling a net operating loss.
| Symbol | ABNB | BA |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.27 | 1.23 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.27 | 0.37 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.29 | -16.13 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.09 | 0.34 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | -3.55 |