ABEV vs. MICC: Ambev vs. Magnum Ice Cream Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Ambev (ABEV) and Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) both fall under the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group, but ABEV is classified in Beverages while MICC is classified in Food Products.

Ambev (ABEV) has been public since March 5, 1997, giving it decades of market history across multiple cycles, while Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) listed only on December 8, 2025 and lacks comparable through-cycle data.

Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) trades as ordinary local shares, while Ambev (ABEV) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Ambev (ABEV) is heavily traded at around 26.44M shares per day, whereas Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) sees a more moderate 817.08K — larger orders in the latter may require more patience and tighter control over order sizing.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Both ABEV and MICC need 1-year volatility and 1-year return to plot risk-return positioning.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Ambev (ABEV) at 17.65% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) at 9.64% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for ABEV.

Ambev (ABEV) at 17.69% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) at 2.24%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

Ambev (ABEV) at 25.56% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) at 12.49%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) at -0.47% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Ambev (ABEV) at -1.35% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Ambev (ABEV) at 2.20% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) at -49.24% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Ambev (ABEV) at 1.06 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) at 1.01 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for MICC.

Ambev (ABEV) at 0.03 keeps leverage in the lower quartile, while Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) at 3.43 is above its industry debt-to-equity ratio range.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Ambev (ABEV) reports a yield of 9.64%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Ambev (ABEV) reports a payout of 74.21%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Ambev (ABEV) at 14.68 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) at 39.67 sits in the richer quartile — MICC needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

Ambev (ABEV) at 0.48 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) at 1.45 prices around its industry’s middle — ABEV costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

Ambev (ABEV) at 2.38 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Magnum Ice Cream (MICC) at 9.80 prices above its benchmark range — MICC looks rich relative to book.

Valuation Metrics