ABEV vs. GIS: Ambev vs. General Mills Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Ambev (ABEV) and General Mills (GIS) both fall under the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group, but ABEV is classified in Beverages while GIS is classified in Food Products.

General Mills (GIS) trades as ordinary local shares, while Ambev (ABEV) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

General Mills (GIS) reports a negative beta of -0.01, suggesting inverse market sensitivity over the measurement window. That is uncommon for ordinary equities and can reflect commodity-linked or hedge-like exposure, but it can also come from statistical noise. Ambev (ABEV) has a non-negative beta of 0.56.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

General Mills (GIS) reports a negative ROE of -10.50%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile Ambev (ABEV) reports 17.65%, ranking against industry peers normally.

General Mills (GIS) reports a negative net margin of -4.89%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Ambev (ABEV) reports 17.69%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Ambev (ABEV) at 25.56% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of General Mills (GIS) at 15.24%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Ambev (ABEV) at -1.35% and General Mills (GIS) at -5.45% post bottom-quartile revenue growth versus peers, pointing to weaker demand or pricing momentum than typical rivals.

Ambev (ABEV) at 2.20% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while General Mills (GIS) at -103.90% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Ambev (ABEV) at 1.06 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while General Mills (GIS) at 0.70 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for GIS.

Ambev (ABEV) at 0.03 keeps leverage in the lower quartile, while General Mills (GIS) at 1.82 sits in the higher-leverage quartile.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

General Mills (GIS) at 6.69% earns its spot in the top quartile of its industry’s yields; Ambev (ABEV) at 9.64% is past the top of its own peer range — territory where a dividend-safety check matters more than the headline number.

Both Ambev (ABEV) at 74.21% and General Mills (GIS) at 59.41% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Ambev (ABEV) trades at 14.68 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while General Mills (GIS) has no P/E ratio this period.

Ambev (ABEV) at 0.48 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while General Mills (GIS) at 1.04 prices around its industry’s middle — ABEV costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

On P/B ratio, both Ambev (ABEV) at 2.38 and General Mills (GIS) at 2.55 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

Valuation Metrics