ABBV vs. MDT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ABBV and MDT, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ABBV dominates in value with a market cap of 321.13 billion USD, eclipsing MDT’s 108.26 billion USD by roughly 2.97×.
MDT carries a higher beta at 0.83, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while ABBV remains steadier at 0.55.
| Symbol | ABBV | MDT |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | AbbVie Inc. | Medtronic plc |
| Country | US | IE |
| Sector | Healthcare | Healthcare |
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - General | Medical - Devices |
| CEO | Mr. Robert A. Michael CPA | Mr. Geoffrey Straub Martha |
| Price | 181.8 USD | 84.41 USD |
| Market Cap | 321.13 billion USD | 108.26 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.55 | 0.83 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | January 2, 2013 | May 2, 1973 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ABBV and MDT over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between ABBV and MDT, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | ABBV | MDT |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 76.62 | 25.41 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 7.16 | 3.27 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 5.60 | 3.26 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 226.35 | 2.19 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 20.87 | 19.80 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 23.58 | 14.23 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 6.73 | 4.03 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 25.08 | 24.44 |
Dividend Comparison
Both ABBV and MDT offer similar dividend yields (3.51% vs. 3.32%), indicating comparable approaches to balancing income and growth.
| Symbol | ABBV | MDT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 3.51% | 3.32% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ABBV and MDT, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- ABBV’s current ratio of 0.76 signals a possible liquidity squeeze, while MDT at 1.90 comfortably covers its short-term obligations.
- ABBV’s quick ratio of 0.64 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas MDT at 1.43 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
- ABBV is heavily leveraged (debt-to-equity ratio 49.22), which can boost returns but raises risk if borrowing costs climb, while MDT at 0.54 keeps leverage at a more moderate level.
| Symbol | ABBV | MDT |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.76 | 1.90 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.64 | 1.43 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 49.22 | 0.54 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.51 | 0.30 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 6.14 | 7.99 |