ABBV vs. IRTC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ABBV and IRTC, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ABBV dominates in value with a market cap of 321.13 billion USD, eclipsing IRTC’s 4.47 billion USD by roughly 71.92×.
IRTC carries a higher beta at 1.34, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while ABBV remains steadier at 0.55.
| Symbol | ABBV | IRTC |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | AbbVie Inc. | iRhythm Technologies, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Healthcare | Healthcare |
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - General | Medical - Devices |
| CEO | Mr. Robert A. Michael CPA | Mr. Quentin S. Blackford |
| Price | 181.8 USD | 139.87 USD |
| Market Cap | 321.13 billion USD | 4.47 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.55 | 1.34 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | January 2, 2013 | October 20, 2016 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ABBV and IRTC over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ABBV and IRTC based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- IRTC shows a negative P/E of -44.94, highlighting a year of losses, whereas ABBV at 76.62 trades on solid profitability.
- IRTC shows a negative forward PEG of -3.27, signaling expected earnings contraction, while ABBV at 7.16 maintains analysts’ projections for stable or improved profits.
| Symbol | ABBV | IRTC |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 76.62 | -44.94 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 7.16 | -3.27 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 5.60 | 7.22 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 226.35 | 50.98 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 20.87 | 320.26 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 23.58 | -68.66 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 6.73 | 7.80 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 25.08 | 346.10 |
Dividend Comparison
ABBV delivers a 3.51% dividend yield, blending income with growth, whereas IRTC appears to retain its profits, possibly to fund operations, R&D, or other growth initiatives.
| Symbol | ABBV | IRTC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 3.51% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ABBV and IRTC, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- ABBV’s current ratio of 0.76 signals a possible liquidity squeeze, while IRTC at 5.71 comfortably covers its short-term obligations.
- ABBV’s quick ratio of 0.64 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas IRTC at 5.58 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
- ABBV and IRTC both have debt-to-equity ratios above 3 (49.22 and 8.49), reflecting aggressive use of debt that can amplify gains but also increase vulnerability to rising rates.
- ABBV meets its interest obligations (ratio 6.14). In stark contrast, IRTC’s negative ratio (-16.44) means its operating earnings (EBIT) don't cover basic operations, let alone interest, signaling serious financial trouble.
| Symbol | ABBV | IRTC |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.76 | 5.71 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.64 | 5.58 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 49.22 | 8.49 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.51 | 0.79 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 6.14 | -16.44 |