Seek Returns logo

AAPL vs. RDDT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated

Here’s a clear look at AAPL and RDDT, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.

Company Overview

AAPL dominates in value with a market cap of 3,018.38 billion USD, eclipsing RDDT’s 17.69 billion USD by roughly 170.66×.

RDDT carries a higher beta at 2.93, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AAPL remains steadier at 1.27.

SymbolAAPLRDDT
Company NameApple Inc.Reddit, Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyCommunication Services
IndustryConsumer ElectronicsInternet Content & Information
CEOMr. Timothy D. CookMr. Steven Ladd Huffman
Price202.09 USD95.85 USD
Market Cap3,018.38 billion USD17.69 billion USD
Beta1.272.93
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateDecember 12, 1980March 21, 2024
ADRNoNo

Performance Comparison

This chart compares the performance of AAPL and RDDT over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).

Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

Valuation Metrics Comparison

The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AAPL and RDDT based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.

  • RDDT features a high P/E of 149.19, indicating strong growth expectations, compared to AAPL at 31.14, which trades at a more standard valuation based on its current earnings.
SymbolAAPLRDDT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)31.14149.19
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)2.852.92
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)7.5412.20
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)45.367.87
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)30.6556.47
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)22.24591.99
EV-to-Sales (TTM)7.7111.78
EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM)31.3654.52

Dividend Comparison

AAPL delivers a 0.50% dividend yield, blending income with growth, whereas RDDT appears to retain its profits, possibly to fund operations, R&D, or other growth initiatives.

SymbolAAPLRDDT
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.50%0.00%

Financial Strength Metrics Comparison

This section dives into the financial resilience of AAPL and RDDT, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.

  • AAPL’s current ratio of 0.82 signals a possible liquidity squeeze, while RDDT at 12.46 comfortably covers its short-term obligations.
  • AAPL’s quick ratio of 0.78 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas RDDT at 12.46 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
  • Neither AAPL nor RDDT records interest coverage (both “--”), indicating virtually no interest expense—usually a sign of negligible debt.
SymbolAAPLRDDT
Current Ratio (TTM)0.8212.46
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.7812.46
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)1.470.01
Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM)0.300.01
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)----