AAPL vs. NVDA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AAPL and NVDA, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
With AAPL at 3,018.38 billion USD and NVDA at 3,214.29 billion USD, their market capitalizations sit in the same ballpark.
NVDA carries a higher beta at 2.11, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AAPL remains steadier at 1.27.
Symbol | AAPL | NVDA |
---|---|---|
Company Name | Apple Inc. | NVIDIA Corporation |
Country | US | US |
Sector | Technology | Technology |
Industry | Consumer Electronics | Semiconductors |
CEO | Mr. Timothy D. Cook | Mr. Jen-Hsun Huang |
Price | 202.09 USD | 131.8 USD |
Market Cap | 3,018.38 billion USD | 3,214.29 billion USD |
Beta | 1.27 | 2.11 |
Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
IPO Date | December 12, 1980 | January 22, 1999 |
ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AAPL and NVDA over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AAPL and NVDA, please refer to the table below.
Symbol | AAPL | NVDA |
---|---|---|
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 31.14 | 44.29 |
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.85 | 3.64 |
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 7.54 | 24.63 |
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 45.36 | 40.69 |
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 30.65 | 52.82 |
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 22.24 | 37.34 |
EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 7.71 | 24.64 |
EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 31.36 | 52.85 |
Dividend Comparison
AAPL’s dividend yield of 0.50% is about 1547% higher than NVDA’s 0.03%, underscoring its stronger focus on returning cash to shareholders.
Symbol | AAPL | NVDA |
---|---|---|
Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.50% | 0.03% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AAPL and NVDA, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- AAPL’s current ratio of 0.82 signals a possible liquidity squeeze, while NVDA at 4.44 comfortably covers its short-term obligations.
- AAPL’s quick ratio of 0.78 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas NVDA at 3.88 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
- AAPL shows “--” for interest coverage, hinting at negligible interest costs, whereas NVDA (at 329.77) covers its interest obligations.
Symbol | AAPL | NVDA |
---|---|---|
Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.82 | 4.44 |
Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.78 | 3.88 |
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 1.47 | 0.13 |
Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.30 | 0.09 |
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 329.77 |