AAPL vs. JPM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Company Overview

AAPL dwarfs JPM in market cap, clocking in at 3,018.38 billion USD—about 4.16 times the 725.45 billion USD of its counterpart.

AAPL at 1.27 and JPM at 1.07 move in sync when it comes to market volatility.

Performance Comparison

This chart compares the performance of AAPL and JPM over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).

Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

Valuation Metrics Comparison

The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AAPL and JPM based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.

• JPM has a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow of -122.34, indicating it’s spent more cash than it’s brought in over the past year—a cash flow shortfall that raises questions about its operational sustainability. Meanwhile, AAPL at 30.65 maintains a positive cash position.

Dividend Comparison

Both AAPL at 0.50% and JPM at 1.93% pay dividends, blending income with growth in their strategies. Yet JPM’s 1.93% yield, 287% above AAPL’s 0.50%, suggests a focus on generous payouts—possibly from stronger profits—while AAPL leans toward reinvestment, perhaps due to tighter margins.

Financial Strength Metrics Comparison

This section dives into the financial resilience of AAPL and JPM, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.

• For both AAPL (0.82) and JPM (0.58), current ratios sit below 1. With current assets trailing short-term liabilities, they might tap into cash flow or borrowing to stay afloat—a setup not uncommon in certain sectors, though it bears monitoring if cash gets tight.
• AAPL (0.78) and JPM (0.58) both clock quick ratios under 0.8. Without inventory, their liquid assets don’t match short-term debts, so they might lean on sales or loans to cover the difference—doable if cash keeps flowing.
• AAPL’s interest coverage reads “--”, suggesting interest expenses are next to nothing—think tiny debt or ultra-low rates—while JPM at 1.34 teeters below 1.5, earnings barely clearing interest.