Seek Returns logo

AAPL vs. IBM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AAPL and IBM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AAPL’s market capitalization of 3,189.54 billion USD is substantially larger than IBM’s 271.36 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

AAPL’s beta of 1.21 points to significantly higher volatility compared to IBM (beta: 0.65), suggesting AAPL has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

SymbolAAPLIBM
Company NameApple Inc.International Business Machines Corporation
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustryConsumer ElectronicsInformation Technology Services
CEOTimothy D. CookArvind Krishna
Price213.55 USD291.97 USD
Market Cap3,189.54 billion USD271.36 billion USD
Beta1.210.65
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateDecember 12, 1980September 24, 1915
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AAPL and IBM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AAPL vs. IBM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AAPL

151.31%

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
14.30%
Q3
14.30%
Median
5.13%
Q1
-15.88%
Min
-27.23%

AAPL’s Return on Equity of 151.31% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Consumer Electronics industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

IBM

21.32%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
47.24%
Q3
23.27%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.22%
Min
-26.63%

IBM’s Return on Equity of 21.32% is on par with the norm for the Information Technology Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AAPL vs. IBM: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Consumer Electronics and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AAPL

47.30%

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
4.18%
Q3
4.18%
Median
4.09%
Q1
-0.34%
Min
-0.34%

AAPL’s Return on Invested Capital of 47.30% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Consumer Electronics industry. This demonstrates an outstanding ability to deploy capital efficiently and create significant value.

IBM

8.48%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
28.29%
Q3
13.19%
Median
7.24%
Q1
0.23%
Min
-18.82%

IBM’s Return on Invested Capital of 8.48% is in line with the norm for the Information Technology Services industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

AAPL vs. IBM: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Consumer Electronics and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AAPL

24.30%

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
24.30%
Q3
8.81%
Median
8.10%
Q1
-4.74%
Min
-7.22%

A Net Profit Margin of 24.30% places AAPL in the upper quartile for the Consumer Electronics industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

IBM

8.71%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
20.47%
Q3
11.62%
Median
5.97%
Q1
1.89%
Min
-4.62%

IBM’s Net Profit Margin of 8.71% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Information Technology Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AAPL vs. IBM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Consumer Electronics and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AAPL

31.81%

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
31.81%
Q3
16.77%
Median
10.95%
Q1
-0.21%
Min
-4.78%

An Operating Profit Margin of 31.81% places AAPL in the upper quartile for the Consumer Electronics industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

IBM

16.36%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
29.42%
Q3
14.75%
Median
8.92%
Q1
2.62%
Min
-11.92%

An Operating Profit Margin of 16.36% places IBM in the upper quartile for the Information Technology Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AAPL vs. IBM: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Consumer Electronics and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAAPLIBM
Return on Equity (TTM)151.31%21.32%
Return on Assets (TTM)29.37%3.76%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)47.30%8.48%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)24.30%8.71%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)31.81%16.36%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)46.63%57.04%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AAPL

0.82

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
0.82
Q3
0.82
Median
0.70
Q1
0.64
Min
0.63

AAPL’s Current Ratio of 0.82 aligns with the median group of the Consumer Electronics industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

IBM

1.01

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
3.41
Q3
2.37
Median
1.58
Q1
1.20
Min
0.00

IBM’s Current Ratio of 1.01 falls into the lower quartile for the Information Technology Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AAPL vs. IBM: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Consumer Electronics and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AAPL

1.47

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
2.23
Q3
1.47
Median
0.80
Q1
0.51
Min
0.16

AAPL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.47 is typical for the Consumer Electronics industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

IBM

2.49

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.16
Median
0.48
Q1
0.09
Min
0.01

IBM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Information Technology Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.49. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

AAPL vs. IBM: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Consumer Electronics and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AAPL

--

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
14.74
Q3
8.73
Median
3.32
Q1
-40.43
Min
-114.16

Interest Coverage Ratio data for AAPL is currently unavailable.

IBM

5.92

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
17.52
Q3
10.04
Median
4.66
Q1
0.80
Min
-10.50

IBM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.92 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Information Technology Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AAPL vs. IBM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Consumer Electronics and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAAPLIBM
Current Ratio (TTM)0.821.01
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.780.97
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)1.472.49
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.300.46
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.504.53
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--5.92

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AAPL and IBM. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AAPL vs. IBM: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AAPL vs. IBM: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AAPL vs. IBM: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AAPL

0.47%

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
1.88%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.50%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AAPL’s Dividend Yield of 0.47% is consistent with its peers in the Consumer Electronics industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

IBM

2.29%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
16.57%
Q3
1.39%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.29%, IBM offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Information Technology Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

AAPL vs. IBM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Consumer Electronics and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AAPL

15.74%

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
98.30%
Q3
15.74%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AAPL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 15.74% is within the typical range for the Consumer Electronics industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

IBM

112.81%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
112.81%
Q3
20.98%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IBM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 112.81% is above 100%. This means the company is paying out more in dividends than it earned, a practice that is often unsustainable and could indicate a risk to future dividend stability.

AAPL vs. IBM: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Consumer Electronics and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAAPLIBM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.47%2.29%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)15.74%112.81%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AAPL

32.91

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
51.71
Q3
41.35
Median
30.99
Q1
25.46
Min
19.94

AAPL’s P/E Ratio of 32.91 is within the middle range for the Consumer Electronics industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

IBM

49.51

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
49.12
Q3
36.91
Median
24.84
Q1
15.88
Min
1.55

At 49.51, IBM’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Information Technology Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

AAPL vs. IBM: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Consumer Electronics and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AAPL

3.79

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
7.16
Q3
5.62
Median
3.99
Q1
2.77
Min
2.43

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Consumer Electronics industry.

IBM

9.51

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
5.35
Q3
3.79
Median
2.23
Q1
1.19
Min
0.03

IBM’s Forward PEG Ratio of 9.51 is exceptionally high for the Information Technology Services industry. This suggests its stock price is very high relative to its expected earnings growth, signaling significant overvaluation risk.

AAPL vs. IBM: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Consumer Electronics and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AAPL

7.97

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
7.50
Q3
4.17
Median
1.76
Q1
0.88
Min
0.16

With a P/S Ratio of 7.97, AAPL trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Consumer Electronics industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

IBM

4.32

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
8.15
Q3
4.17
Median
2.14
Q1
1.00
Min
0.10

IBM’s P/S Ratio of 4.32 is in the upper echelon for the Information Technology Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

AAPL vs. IBM: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Consumer Electronics and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AAPL

47.94

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
3.36
Q3
3.36
Median
2.83
Q1
2.78
Min
2.78

At 47.94, AAPL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Consumer Electronics industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

IBM

10.08

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
11.78
Q3
6.14
Median
3.23
Q1
1.97
Min
0.42

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Information Technology Services industry.

AAPL vs. IBM: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Consumer Electronics and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAAPLIBM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)32.9149.51
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)3.799.51
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)7.974.32
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)47.9410.08
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)32.3922.73
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)23.4726.54
EV-to-Sales (TTM)8.145.21