Seek Returns logo

AAPL vs. GS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AAPL and GS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAAPLGS
Company NameApple Inc.The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyFinancials
GICS IndustryTechnology Hardware, Storage & PeripheralsCapital Markets
Market Capitalization3,994.44 billion USD238.31 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateDecember 12, 1980May 4, 1999
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AAPL and GS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AAPL vs. GS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAAPLGS
5-Day Price Return1.11%-4.29%
13-Week Price Return17.63%6.10%
26-Week Price Return27.93%26.81%
52-Week Price Return21.01%31.76%
Month-to-Date Return0.75%-1.75%
Year-to-Date Return8.78%35.44%
10-Day Avg. Volume47.55M2.05M
3-Month Avg. Volume52.98M1.91M
3-Month Volatility22.37%24.40%
Beta1.091.35

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AAPL

164.05%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
56.93%
Q3
29.31%
Median
7.95%
Q1
5.02%
Min
-7.45%

AAPL’s Return on Equity of 164.05% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

GS

13.49%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
41.61%
Q3
22.56%
Median
13.62%
Q1
9.23%
Min
-4.25%

GS’s Return on Equity of 13.49% is on par with the norm for the Capital Markets industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AAPL vs. GS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AAPL

26.92%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
17.92%
Q3
8.33%
Median
4.15%
Q1
1.88%
Min
-3.36%

AAPL’s Net Profit Margin of 26.92% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

GS

13.10%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
69.91%
Q3
36.88%
Median
24.30%
Q1
13.14%
Min
-6.20%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry, GS’s Net Profit Margin of 13.10% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

AAPL vs. GS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AAPL

31.97%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
20.70%
Q3
10.85%
Median
6.05%
Q1
3.54%
Min
-4.90%

AAPL’s Operating Profit Margin of 31.97% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

GS

16.71%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
83.68%
Q3
47.64%
Median
32.36%
Q1
19.28%
Min
0.30%

GS’s Operating Profit Margin of 16.71% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

AAPL vs. GS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAAPLGS
Return on Equity (TTM)164.05%13.49%
Return on Assets (TTM)32.80%0.95%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)26.92%13.10%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)31.97%16.71%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)46.91%40.13%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AAPL

0.89

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.90
Median
1.38
Q1
0.97
Min
0.11

AAPL’s Current Ratio of 0.89 falls into the lower quartile for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

GS

0.31

Capital Markets Industry

Max
3.43
Q3
1.76
Median
1.00
Q1
0.60
Min
0.04

For the Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

AAPL vs. GS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AAPL

1.34

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
1.34
Q3
0.82
Median
0.42
Q1
0.16
Min
0.00

AAPL’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.34. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

GS

9.19

Capital Markets Industry

Max
6.12
Q3
2.78
Median
0.96
Q1
0.31
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Capital Markets industry.

AAPL vs. GS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AAPL

622.51

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
143.63
Q3
62.44
Median
17.59
Q1
5.32
Min
-23.93

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 622.51, AAPL demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

GS

--

Capital Markets Industry

Max
107.59
Q3
50.42
Median
10.94
Q1
4.37
Min
-36.26

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Capital Markets industry.

AAPL vs. GS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAAPLGS
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.890.31
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.860.31
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.349.19
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)622.51--

Growth

Revenue Growth

AAPL vs. GS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AAPL vs. GS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AAPL

0.39%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.93%
Q3
3.31%
Median
1.70%
Q1
0.01%
Min
0.00%

AAPL’s Dividend Yield of 0.39% is consistent with its peers in the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GS

2.09%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
8.63%
Q3
4.88%
Median
2.72%
Q1
1.41%
Min
0.00%

GS’s Dividend Yield of 2.09% is consistent with its peers in the Capital Markets industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AAPL vs. GS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AAPL

13.77%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
136.56%
Q3
76.58%
Median
35.95%
Q1
0.01%
Min
0.00%

AAPL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 13.77% is within the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GS

29.80%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
188.84%
Q3
96.52%
Median
61.58%
Q1
31.74%
Min
0.00%

GS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 29.80% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

AAPL vs. GS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAAPLGS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.39%2.09%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)13.77%29.80%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AAPL

35.42

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
43.58
Q3
27.14
Median
21.23
Q1
15.28
Min
8.31

A P/E Ratio of 35.42 places AAPL in the upper quartile for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

GS

14.23

Capital Markets Industry

Max
47.53
Q3
28.81
Median
16.62
Q1
12.06
Min
5.71

GS’s P/E Ratio of 14.23 is within the middle range for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AAPL vs. GS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AAPL

9.53

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
6.35
Q3
3.45
Median
0.96
Q1
0.46
Min
0.04

With a P/S Ratio of 9.53, AAPL trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

GS

1.86

Capital Markets Industry

Max
13.23
Q3
6.65
Median
4.40
Q1
2.22
Min
0.03

In the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry, GS’s P/S Ratio of 1.86 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

AAPL vs. GS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AAPL

51.21

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
13.94
Q3
8.15
Median
1.85
Q1
0.94
Min
0.32

At 51.21, AAPL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

GS

1.94

Capital Markets Industry

Max
10.83
Q3
5.27
Median
2.66
Q1
1.34
Min
0.37

GS’s P/B Ratio of 1.94 is within the conventional range for the Capital Markets industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AAPL vs. GS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAAPLGS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)35.4214.23
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)9.531.86
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)51.211.94
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)40.164.43
AAPL vs. GS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison