AAPL vs. GS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AAPL and GS, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AAPL dominates in value with a market cap of 3,018.38 billion USD, eclipsing GS’s 182.10 billion USD by roughly 16.58×.
With betas of 1.27 for AAPL and 1.31 for GS, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | AAPL | GS |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Apple Inc. | The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Financial Services |
| Industry | Consumer Electronics | Financial - Capital Markets |
| CEO | Mr. Timothy D. Cook | Mr. David Solomon |
| Price | 202.09 USD | 593.46 USD |
| Market Cap | 3,018.38 billion USD | 182.10 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.27 | 1.31 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | December 12, 1980 | May 4, 1999 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AAPL and GS over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AAPL and GS based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- GS reports a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -7.43, showing a cash flow shortfall that could threaten its operational sustainability, while AAPL at 30.65 maintains positive cash flow.
| Symbol | AAPL | GS |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 31.14 | 12.79 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.85 | 1.07 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 7.54 | 3.54 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 45.36 | 107.80 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 30.65 | -7.43 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 22.24 | 9.85 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 7.71 | 3.54 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 31.36 | -7.43 |
Dividend Comparison
GS stands out with a 1.98% dividend yield—around 296% above AAPL’s 0.50%—highlighting its emphasis on generous payouts.
| Symbol | AAPL | GS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.50% | 1.98% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AAPL and GS, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- AAPL’s current ratio of 0.82 signals a possible liquidity squeeze, while GS at 2.35 comfortably covers its short-term obligations.
- AAPL’s quick ratio of 0.78 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas GS at 2.35 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
- AAPL shows “--” for interest coverage (indicating minimal interest cost). GS, however, with a ratio of 0.23, is not generating enough operating earnings to cover its current interest payments.
| Symbol | AAPL | GS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.82 | 2.35 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.78 | 2.35 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 1.47 | 0.04 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.30 | 0.02 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 0.23 |