AAPL vs. GEV: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AAPL and GEV, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AAPL dominates in value with a market cap of 3,018.38 billion USD, eclipsing GEV’s 123.65 billion USD by roughly 24.41×.
With betas of 1.27 for AAPL and 1.22 for GEV, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
Symbol | AAPL | GEV |
---|---|---|
Company Name | Apple Inc. | GE Vernova Inc. |
Country | US | US |
Sector | Technology | Utilities |
Industry | Consumer Electronics | Renewable Utilities |
CEO | Mr. Timothy D. Cook | Mr. Scott L. Strazik |
Price | 202.09 USD | 453.03 USD |
Market Cap | 3,018.38 billion USD | 123.65 billion USD |
Beta | 1.27 | 1.22 |
Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
IPO Date | December 12, 1980 | March 27, 2024 |
ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AAPL and GEV over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AAPL and GEV, please refer to the table below.
Symbol | AAPL | GEV |
---|---|---|
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 31.14 | 64.35 |
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.85 | 1.79 |
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 7.54 | 3.46 |
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 45.36 | 14.47 |
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 30.65 | 37.03 |
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 22.24 | 59.93 |
EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 7.71 | 3.23 |
EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 31.36 | 34.60 |
Dividend Comparison
AAPL’s dividend yield of 0.50% is about 353% higher than GEV’s 0.11%, underscoring its stronger focus on returning cash to shareholders.
Symbol | AAPL | GEV |
---|---|---|
Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.50% | 0.11% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AAPL and GEV, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- AAPL’s current ratio of 0.82 signals a possible liquidity squeeze, while GEV at 1.04 comfortably covers its short-term obligations.
- Both AAPL (quick ratio 0.78) and GEV (quick ratio 0.78) fall below 0.8, meaning their most liquid assets—excluding inventory—aren’t enough to meet short-term obligations. This could force them to rely on receivables, inventory turn, or external financing.
- AAPL shows “--” for interest coverage, hinting at negligible interest costs, whereas GEV (at 15.52) covers its interest obligations.
Symbol | AAPL | GEV |
---|---|---|
Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.82 | 1.04 |
Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.78 | 0.78 |
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 1.47 | 0.00 |
Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.30 | 0.00 |
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 15.52 |