AAPL vs. ETN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AAPL and ETN, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AAPL dominates in value with a market cap of 3,018.38 billion USD, eclipsing ETN’s 126.13 billion USD by roughly 23.93×.
With betas of 1.27 for AAPL and 1.13 for ETN, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | AAPL | ETN |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Apple Inc. | Eaton Corporation plc |
| Country | US | IE |
| Sector | Technology | Industrials |
| Industry | Consumer Electronics | Industrial - Machinery |
| CEO | Mr. Timothy D. Cook | Mr. Craig Arnold |
| Price | 202.09 USD | 322.33 USD |
| Market Cap | 3,018.38 billion USD | 126.13 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.27 | 1.13 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | December 12, 1980 | June 1, 1972 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AAPL and ETN over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AAPL and ETN, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | AAPL | ETN |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 31.14 | 32.11 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.85 | 2.49 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 7.54 | 4.98 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 45.36 | 6.82 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 30.65 | 38.01 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 22.24 | 30.97 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 7.71 | 5.34 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 31.36 | 40.72 |
Dividend Comparison
ETN stands out with a 1.23% dividend yield—around 146% above AAPL’s 0.50%—highlighting its emphasis on generous payouts.
| Symbol | AAPL | ETN |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.50% | 1.23% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AAPL and ETN, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- AAPL’s current ratio of 0.82 signals a possible liquidity squeeze, while ETN at 1.31 comfortably covers its short-term obligations.
- AAPL’s quick ratio of 0.78 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas ETN at 0.84 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
- AAPL shows “--” for interest coverage, hinting at negligible interest costs, whereas ETN (at 36.86) covers its interest obligations.
| Symbol | AAPL | ETN |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.82 | 1.31 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.78 | 0.84 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 1.47 | 0.58 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.30 | 0.27 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 36.86 |