Seek Returns logo

AAPL vs. BABA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AAPL and BABA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AAPL’s market capitalization of 3,189.54 billion USD is substantially larger than BABA’s 259.33 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

AAPL’s beta of 1.21 points to significantly higher volatility compared to BABA (beta: 0.21), suggesting AAPL has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

BABA is an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), allowing U.S. investors direct exposure to its non-U.S. operations. AAPL, on the other hand, is a domestic entity.

SymbolAAPLBABA
Company NameApple Inc.Alibaba Group Holding Limited
CountryUSCN
SectorTechnologyConsumer Cyclical
IndustryConsumer ElectronicsSpecialty Retail
CEOTimothy D. CookYongming Wu
Price213.55 USD108.7 USD
Market Cap3,189.54 billion USD259.33 billion USD
Beta1.210.21
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateDecember 12, 1980September 19, 2014
ADRNoYes

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AAPL and BABA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AAPL vs. BABA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AAPL

151.31%

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
14.30%
Q3
14.30%
Median
5.13%
Q1
-15.88%
Min
-27.23%

AAPL’s Return on Equity of 151.31% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Consumer Electronics industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

BABA

13.33%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
70.52%
Q3
29.03%
Median
10.90%
Q1
-7.86%
Min
-57.43%

BABA’s Return on Equity of 13.33% is on par with the norm for the Specialty Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AAPL vs. BABA: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Consumer Electronics and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AAPL

47.30%

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
4.18%
Q3
4.18%
Median
4.09%
Q1
-0.34%
Min
-0.34%

AAPL’s Return on Invested Capital of 47.30% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Consumer Electronics industry. This demonstrates an outstanding ability to deploy capital efficiently and create significant value.

BABA

7.90%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
29.46%
Q3
13.75%
Median
8.05%
Q1
0.80%
Min
-17.95%

BABA’s Return on Invested Capital of 7.90% is in line with the norm for the Specialty Retail industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

AAPL vs. BABA: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Consumer Electronics and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AAPL

24.30%

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
24.30%
Q3
8.81%
Median
8.10%
Q1
-4.74%
Min
-7.22%

A Net Profit Margin of 24.30% places AAPL in the upper quartile for the Consumer Electronics industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

BABA

13.06%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
19.78%
Q3
8.49%
Median
3.43%
Q1
-0.69%
Min
-9.88%

A Net Profit Margin of 13.06% places BABA in the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

AAPL vs. BABA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Consumer Electronics and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AAPL

31.81%

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
31.81%
Q3
16.77%
Median
10.95%
Q1
-0.21%
Min
-4.78%

An Operating Profit Margin of 31.81% places AAPL in the upper quartile for the Consumer Electronics industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

BABA

14.14%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
24.47%
Q3
11.10%
Median
5.85%
Q1
0.66%
Min
-12.62%

An Operating Profit Margin of 14.14% places BABA in the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AAPL vs. BABA: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Consumer Electronics and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAAPLBABA
Return on Equity (TTM)151.31%13.33%
Return on Assets (TTM)29.37%7.21%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)47.30%7.90%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)24.30%13.06%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)31.81%14.14%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)46.63%39.95%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AAPL

0.82

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
0.82
Q3
0.82
Median
0.70
Q1
0.64
Min
0.63

AAPL’s Current Ratio of 0.82 aligns with the median group of the Consumer Electronics industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

BABA

1.55

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
3.24
Q3
1.99
Median
1.42
Q1
1.02
Min
0.54

BABA’s Current Ratio of 1.55 aligns with the median group of the Specialty Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AAPL vs. BABA: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Consumer Electronics and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AAPL

1.47

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
2.23
Q3
1.47
Median
0.80
Q1
0.51
Min
0.16

AAPL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.47 is typical for the Consumer Electronics industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

BABA

0.25

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
2.72
Q3
1.42
Median
0.87
Q1
0.35
Min
0.01

Falling into the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, BABA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.25 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

AAPL vs. BABA: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Consumer Electronics and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AAPL

--

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
14.74
Q3
8.73
Median
3.32
Q1
-40.43
Min
-114.16

Interest Coverage Ratio data for AAPL is currently unavailable.

BABA

19.85

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
17.19
Median
4.28
Q1
0.11
Min
-23.60

BABA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 19.85 is in the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

AAPL vs. BABA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Consumer Electronics and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAAPLBABA
Current Ratio (TTM)0.821.55
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.781.55
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)1.470.25
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.300.14
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.500.55
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--19.85

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AAPL and BABA. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AAPL vs. BABA: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AAPL vs. BABA: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AAPL vs. BABA: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AAPL

0.47%

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
1.88%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.50%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AAPL’s Dividend Yield of 0.47% is consistent with its peers in the Consumer Electronics industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

BABA

1.87%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.54%
Q3
1.52%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.87%, BABA offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Specialty Retail industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

AAPL vs. BABA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Consumer Electronics and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AAPL

15.74%

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
98.30%
Q3
15.74%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AAPL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 15.74% is within the typical range for the Consumer Electronics industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

BABA

22.23%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
177.64%
Q3
9.49%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

BABA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.23% is in the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

AAPL vs. BABA: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Consumer Electronics and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAAPLBABA
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.47%1.87%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)15.74%22.23%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AAPL

32.91

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
51.71
Q3
41.35
Median
30.99
Q1
25.46
Min
19.94

AAPL’s P/E Ratio of 32.91 is within the middle range for the Consumer Electronics industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

BABA

1.79

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
81.45
Q3
42.51
Median
25.40
Q1
12.72
Min
1.88

BABA’s P/E Ratio of 1.79 is below the typical range for the Specialty Retail industry. This may indicate that the stock is potentially undervalued, or it could reflect market concerns about the company’s future prospects.

AAPL vs. BABA: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Consumer Electronics and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AAPL

3.79

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
7.16
Q3
5.62
Median
3.99
Q1
2.77
Min
2.43

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Consumer Electronics industry.

BABA

0.17

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.90
Q3
2.79
Median
1.76
Q1
0.69
Min
0.00

In the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, BABA’s Forward PEG Ratio of 0.17 is a positive indicator. It suggests that the stock may be attractively valued relative to its expected earnings growth.

AAPL vs. BABA: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Consumer Electronics and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AAPL

7.97

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
7.50
Q3
4.17
Median
1.76
Q1
0.88
Min
0.16

With a P/S Ratio of 7.97, AAPL trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Consumer Electronics industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

BABA

1.84

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.26
Q3
2.60
Median
1.29
Q1
0.41
Min
0.06

BABA’s P/S Ratio of 1.84 aligns with the market consensus for the Specialty Retail industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AAPL vs. BABA: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Consumer Electronics and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AAPL

47.94

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
3.36
Q3
3.36
Median
2.83
Q1
2.78
Min
2.78

At 47.94, AAPL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Consumer Electronics industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

BABA

0.23

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
12.73
Q3
6.96
Median
3.28
Q1
1.42
Min
0.24

BABA’s P/B Ratio of 0.23 is below the established floor for the Specialty Retail industry. This may signal that the market is deeply pessimistic or has overlooked the company, potentially offering its asset base at a significant discount.

AAPL vs. BABA: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Consumer Electronics and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAAPLBABA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)32.911.79
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)3.790.17
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)7.971.84
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)47.940.23
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)32.3928.06
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)23.4710.31
EV-to-Sales (TTM)8.141.95