Seek Returns logo

AAPL vs. BA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AAPL and BA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AAPL’s market capitalization of 3,189.54 billion USD is substantially larger than BA’s 162.80 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

With betas of 1.21 for AAPL and 1.42 for BA, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolAAPLBA
Company NameApple Inc.The Boeing Company
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyIndustrials
IndustryConsumer ElectronicsAerospace & Defense
CEOTimothy D. CookRobert K. Ortberg
Price213.55 USD215.92 USD
Market Cap3,189.54 billion USD162.80 billion USD
Beta1.211.42
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateDecember 12, 1980January 2, 1962
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AAPL and BA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AAPL vs. BA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AAPL

151.31%

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
14.30%
Q3
14.30%
Median
5.13%
Q1
-15.88%
Min
-27.23%

AAPL’s Return on Equity of 151.31% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Consumer Electronics industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

BA

94.43%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
42.57%
Q3
16.67%
Median
8.39%
Q1
-0.77%
Min
-23.36%

BA’s Return on Equity of 94.43% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

AAPL vs. BA: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Consumer Electronics and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AAPL

47.30%

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
4.18%
Q3
4.18%
Median
4.09%
Q1
-0.34%
Min
-0.34%

AAPL’s Return on Invested Capital of 47.30% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Consumer Electronics industry. This demonstrates an outstanding ability to deploy capital efficiently and create significant value.

BA

-16.36%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
23.42%
Q3
8.86%
Median
5.47%
Q1
-5.60%
Min
-22.46%

BA has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -16.36%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

AAPL vs. BA: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Consumer Electronics and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AAPL

24.30%

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
24.30%
Q3
8.81%
Median
8.10%
Q1
-4.74%
Min
-7.22%

A Net Profit Margin of 24.30% places AAPL in the upper quartile for the Consumer Electronics industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

BA

-16.58%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
22.67%
Q3
8.04%
Median
4.95%
Q1
-5.07%
Min
-16.58%

BA has a negative Net Profit Margin of -16.58%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

AAPL vs. BA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Consumer Electronics and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AAPL

31.81%

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
31.81%
Q3
16.77%
Median
10.95%
Q1
-0.21%
Min
-4.78%

An Operating Profit Margin of 31.81% places AAPL in the upper quartile for the Consumer Electronics industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

BA

-14.63%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
22.01%
Q3
11.49%
Median
8.96%
Q1
3.77%
Min
-4.96%

BA has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -14.63%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

AAPL vs. BA: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Consumer Electronics and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAAPLBA
Return on Equity (TTM)151.31%94.43%
Return on Assets (TTM)29.37%-7.36%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)47.30%-16.36%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)24.30%-16.58%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)31.81%-14.63%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)46.63%-2.09%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AAPL

0.82

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
0.82
Q3
0.82
Median
0.70
Q1
0.64
Min
0.63

AAPL’s Current Ratio of 0.82 aligns with the median group of the Consumer Electronics industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

BA

1.23

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
5.13
Q3
3.36
Median
2.16
Q1
1.20
Min
0.41

BA’s Current Ratio of 1.23 aligns with the median group of the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AAPL vs. BA: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Consumer Electronics and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AAPL

1.47

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
2.23
Q3
1.47
Median
0.80
Q1
0.51
Min
0.16

AAPL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.47 is typical for the Consumer Electronics industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

BA

-16.13

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
1.20
Q3
0.73
Median
0.51
Q1
0.09
Min
0.00

BA has a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of -16.13, which indicates negative shareholder equity where liabilities exceed assets. This is a critical sign of financial distress.

AAPL vs. BA: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Consumer Electronics and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AAPL

--

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
14.74
Q3
8.73
Median
3.32
Q1
-40.43
Min
-114.16

Interest Coverage Ratio data for AAPL is currently unavailable.

BA

-3.55

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
12.62
Q3
7.38
Median
2.95
Q1
1.68
Min
-6.68

BA has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -3.55. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

AAPL vs. BA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Consumer Electronics and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAAPLBA
Current Ratio (TTM)0.821.23
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.780.37
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)1.47-16.13
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.300.34
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.50-6.18
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)---3.55

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AAPL and BA. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AAPL vs. BA: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AAPL vs. BA: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AAPL vs. BA: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AAPL

0.47%

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
1.88%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.50%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AAPL’s Dividend Yield of 0.47% is consistent with its peers in the Consumer Electronics industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

BA

0.00%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
6.00%
Q3
0.66%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

BA currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AAPL vs. BA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Consumer Electronics and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AAPL

15.74%

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
98.30%
Q3
15.74%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AAPL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 15.74% is within the typical range for the Consumer Electronics industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

BA

-0.63%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
172.02%
Q3
32.47%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

BA has a negative Dividend Payout Ratio of -0.63%. This typically means the company paid a dividend despite reporting a net loss, a situation that may signal financial instability.

AAPL vs. BA: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Consumer Electronics and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAAPLBA
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.47%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)15.74%-0.63%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AAPL

32.91

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
51.71
Q3
41.35
Median
30.99
Q1
25.46
Min
19.94

AAPL’s P/E Ratio of 32.91 is within the middle range for the Consumer Electronics industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

BA

-14.13

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
75.34
Q3
54.40
Median
38.63
Q1
26.10
Min
16.44

BA has a negative P/E Ratio of -14.13. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

AAPL vs. BA: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Consumer Electronics and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AAPL

3.79

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
7.16
Q3
5.62
Median
3.99
Q1
2.77
Min
2.43

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Consumer Electronics industry.

BA

-6.47

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
10.68
Q3
5.36
Median
2.31
Q1
1.47
Min
0.01

BA has a negative Forward PEG Ratio of -6.47. This typically results from negative earnings or forecasts of declining future earnings, making the ratio not meaningful for valuation.

AAPL vs. BA: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Consumer Electronics and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AAPL

7.97

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
7.50
Q3
4.17
Median
1.76
Q1
0.88
Min
0.16

With a P/S Ratio of 7.97, AAPL trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Consumer Electronics industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

BA

2.34

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
19.34
Q3
9.54
Median
2.71
Q1
1.59
Min
0.35

BA’s P/S Ratio of 2.34 aligns with the market consensus for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AAPL vs. BA: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Consumer Electronics and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AAPL

47.94

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
3.36
Q3
3.36
Median
2.83
Q1
2.78
Min
2.78

At 47.94, AAPL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Consumer Electronics industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

BA

-48.92

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
16.08
Q3
8.12
Median
4.12
Q1
2.69
Min
0.69

BA has a negative P/B Ratio of -48.92, indicating its liabilities exceed its assets and result in negative shareholder equity. This is a critical warning sign of financial distress.

AAPL vs. BA: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Consumer Electronics and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAAPLBA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)32.91-14.13
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)3.79-6.47
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)7.972.34
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)47.94-48.92
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)32.39-12.76
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)23.47-29.33
EV-to-Sales (TTM)8.142.97