AAPL vs. BA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Company Overview

AAPL dominates in value with a market cap of 3,018.38 billion USD, eclipsing BA’s 153.22 billion USD by roughly 19.70×.

With betas of 1.27 for AAPL and 1.41 for BA, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.

Performance Comparison

This chart compares the performance of AAPL and BA over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).

Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

Valuation Metrics Comparison

The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AAPL and BA based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.

• BA shows a negative P/E of -13.30, highlighting a year of losses, whereas AAPL at 31.14 trades on solid profitability.
• BA shows a negative forward PEG of -6.09, signaling expected earnings contraction, while AAPL at 2.85 maintains analysts’ projections for stable or improved profits.
• BA carries a sub-zero price-to-book ratio of -46.04, indicating negative equity. In contrast, AAPL (P/B 45.36) has positive book value.
• BA reports a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -12.01, showing a cash flow shortfall that could threaten its operational sustainability, while AAPL at 30.65 maintains positive cash flow.

Dividend Comparison

AAPL delivers a 0.50% dividend yield, blending income with growth, whereas BA appears to retain its profits, possibly to fund operations, R&D, or other growth initiatives.

Financial Strength Metrics Comparison

This section dives into the financial resilience of AAPL and BA, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.

• AAPL’s current ratio of 0.82 signals a possible liquidity squeeze, while BA at 1.23 comfortably covers its short-term obligations.
• Both AAPL (quick ratio 0.78) and BA (quick ratio 0.37) fall below 0.8, meaning their most liquid assets—excluding inventory—aren’t enough to meet short-term obligations. This could force them to rely on receivables, inventory turn, or external financing.
• BA has negative equity (debt-to-equity ratio -16.13), suggesting asset shortfalls, whereas AAPL at 1.47 preserves healthier equity coverage.
• AAPL shows “--” (minimal interest expense), but BA is in the red with interest coverage -3.55, signaling a net operating loss.