AAPL vs. ASML: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AAPL and ASML, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AAPL dominates in value with a market cap of 3,018.38 billion USD, eclipsing ASML’s 289.86 billion USD by roughly 10.41×.
With betas of 1.27 for AAPL and 1.22 for ASML, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
ASML is an ADR, letting U.S. buyers tap its non-U.S. business directly, unlike AAPL, which is purely domestic.
| Symbol | AAPL | ASML |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Apple Inc. | ASML Holding N.V. |
| Country | US | NL |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Consumer Electronics | Semiconductors |
| CEO | Mr. Timothy D. Cook | Mr. Christophe D. Fouquet |
| Price | 202.09 USD | 737.17 USD |
| Market Cap | 3,018.38 billion USD | 289.86 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.27 | 1.22 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | December 12, 1980 | March 15, 1995 |
| ADR | No | Yes |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AAPL and ASML over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AAPL and ASML, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | AAPL | ASML |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 31.14 | 29.38 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.85 | 1.80 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 7.54 | 8.34 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 45.36 | 14.61 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 30.65 | 27.60 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 22.24 | 21.82 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 7.71 | 8.17 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 31.36 | 27.02 |
Dividend Comparison
ASML stands out with a 0.98% dividend yield—around 96% above AAPL’s 0.50%—highlighting its emphasis on generous payouts.
| Symbol | AAPL | ASML |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.50% | 0.98% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AAPL and ASML, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- AAPL’s current ratio of 0.82 signals a possible liquidity squeeze, while ASML at 1.52 comfortably covers its short-term obligations.
- AAPL’s quick ratio of 0.78 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas ASML at 0.91 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
- Neither AAPL nor ASML records interest coverage (both “--”), indicating virtually no interest expense—usually a sign of negligible debt.
| Symbol | AAPL | ASML |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.82 | 1.52 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.78 | 0.91 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 1.47 | 0.21 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.30 | 0.08 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | -- |