Seek Returns logo

AAPL vs. AFRM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AAPL and AFRM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAAPLAFRM
Company NameApple Inc.Affirm Holdings, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyFinancials
GICS IndustryTechnology Hardware, Storage & PeripheralsFinancial Services
Market Capitalization3,354.08 billion USD23.54 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateDecember 12, 1980January 13, 2021
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AAPL and AFRM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AAPL vs. AFRM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAAPLAFRM
5-Day Price Return-2.91%-4.95%
13-Week Price Return8.25%40.50%
26-Week Price Return-6.43%-2.38%
52-Week Price Return0.05%159.61%
Month-to-Date Return8.88%7.73%
Year-to-Date Return-9.75%21.28%
10-Day Avg. Volume61.85M5.47M
3-Month Avg. Volume56.06M6.45M
3-Month Volatility23.04%52.09%
Beta1.083.68

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AAPL

154.92%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
47.24%
Q3
29.40%
Median
9.11%
Q1
6.06%
Min
-0.79%

AAPL’s Return on Equity of 154.92% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

AFRM

-2.22%

Financial Services Industry

Max
40.58%
Q3
20.06%
Median
10.67%
Q1
4.19%
Min
-10.31%

AFRM has a negative Return on Equity of -2.22%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

AAPL vs. AFRM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AAPL

24.30%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
13.86%
Q3
8.17%
Median
4.62%
Q1
3.65%
Min
-0.21%

AAPL’s Net Profit Margin of 24.30% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

AFRM

-2.33%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.86%
Q3
25.58%
Median
12.23%
Q1
6.64%
Min
-9.92%

AFRM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -2.33%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

AAPL vs. AFRM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AAPL

31.87%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
17.80%
Q3
10.33%
Median
6.31%
Q1
4.86%
Min
2.53%

AAPL’s Operating Profit Margin of 31.87% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

AFRM

-5.22%

Financial Services Industry

Max
77.28%
Q3
37.68%
Median
18.17%
Q1
9.27%
Min
-8.19%

AFRM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -5.22%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

AAPL vs. AFRM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAAPLAFRM
Return on Equity (TTM)154.92%-2.22%
Return on Assets (TTM)28.95%-0.61%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)24.30%-2.33%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)31.87%-5.22%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)46.68%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AAPL

0.87

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
2.47
Q3
1.98
Median
1.40
Q1
1.26
Min
0.70

AAPL’s Current Ratio of 0.87 falls into the lower quartile for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AFRM

4.49

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.58
Q3
2.59
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

AAPL vs. AFRM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AAPL

1.54

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
1.47
Q3
0.93
Median
0.32
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.54, AAPL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

AFRM

2.49

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.10
Median
0.57
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

AAPL vs. AFRM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AAPL

622.51

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
204.63
Q3
90.22
Median
21.70
Q1
6.79
Min
-23.93

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 622.51, AAPL demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

AFRM

-3.76

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

AAPL vs. AFRM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAAPLAFRM
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.874.49
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.834.41
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.542.49
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)622.51-3.76

Growth

Revenue Growth

AAPL vs. AFRM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AAPL vs. AFRM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AAPL

0.46%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.50%
Q3
3.66%
Median
1.90%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AAPL’s Dividend Yield of 0.46% is consistent with its peers in the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AFRM

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.18%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.56%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AFRM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AAPL vs. AFRM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AAPL

15.47%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
142.87%
Q3
66.07%
Median
42.79%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AAPL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 15.47% is within the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AFRM

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
155.56%
Q3
63.71%
Median
18.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AFRM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AAPL vs. AFRM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAAPLAFRM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.46%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)15.47%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AAPL

33.94

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
43.16
Q3
27.56
Median
17.85
Q1
12.48
Min
6.21

A P/E Ratio of 33.94 places AAPL in the upper quartile for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

AFRM

--

Financial Services Industry

Max
63.23
Q3
32.10
Median
14.41
Q1
10.81
Min
0.37

P/E Ratio data for AFRM is currently unavailable.

AAPL vs. AFRM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AAPL

8.25

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.27
Q3
1.99
Median
0.93
Q1
0.45
Min
0.04

With a P/S Ratio of 8.25, AAPL trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

AFRM

8.81

Financial Services Industry

Max
11.16
Q3
5.45
Median
2.61
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

AAPL vs. AFRM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AAPL

46.55

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
12.51
Q3
6.11
Median
1.73
Q1
1.01
Min
0.31

At 46.55, AAPL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AFRM

5.03

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.09
Q3
3.79
Median
1.46
Q1
0.83
Min
0.04

AFRM’s P/B Ratio of 5.03 is in the upper tier for the Financial Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

AAPL vs. AFRM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAAPLAFRM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)33.94--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)8.258.81
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)46.555.03
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)35.0338.68