Seek Returns logo

AAPL vs. AFRM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AAPL and AFRM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAAPLAFRM
Company NameApple Inc.Affirm Holdings, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyFinancials
GICS IndustryTechnology Hardware, Storage & PeripheralsFinancial Services
Market Capitalization3,994.44 billion USD22.71 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateDecember 12, 1980January 13, 2021
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AAPL and AFRM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AAPL vs. AFRM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAAPLAFRM
5-Day Price Return1.11%-7.33%
13-Week Price Return17.63%-10.43%
26-Week Price Return27.93%30.72%
52-Week Price Return21.01%28.62%
Month-to-Date Return0.75%-1.91%
Year-to-Date Return8.78%15.78%
10-Day Avg. Volume47.55M7.31M
3-Month Avg. Volume52.98M6.96M
3-Month Volatility22.37%67.46%
Beta1.093.62

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AAPL

164.05%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
56.93%
Q3
29.31%
Median
7.95%
Q1
5.02%
Min
-7.45%

AAPL’s Return on Equity of 164.05% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

AFRM

7.75%

Financial Services Industry

Max
34.42%
Q3
16.76%
Median
9.18%
Q1
3.90%
Min
-10.16%

AFRM’s Return on Equity of 7.75% is on par with the norm for the Financial Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AAPL vs. AFRM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AAPL

26.92%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
17.92%
Q3
8.33%
Median
4.15%
Q1
1.88%
Min
-3.36%

AAPL’s Net Profit Margin of 26.92% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

AFRM

6.74%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.16%
Q3
25.33%
Median
13.11%
Q1
7.04%
Min
-8.99%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry, AFRM’s Net Profit Margin of 6.74% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

AAPL vs. AFRM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AAPL

31.97%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
20.70%
Q3
10.85%
Median
6.05%
Q1
3.54%
Min
-4.90%

AAPL’s Operating Profit Margin of 31.97% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

AFRM

4.96%

Financial Services Industry

Max
81.07%
Q3
40.32%
Median
19.93%
Q1
10.20%
Min
-34.40%

AFRM’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.96% is in the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

AAPL vs. AFRM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAAPLAFRM
Return on Equity (TTM)164.05%7.75%
Return on Assets (TTM)32.80%2.14%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)26.92%6.74%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)31.97%4.96%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)46.91%92.50%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AAPL

0.89

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.90
Median
1.38
Q1
0.97
Min
0.11

AAPL’s Current Ratio of 0.89 falls into the lower quartile for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AFRM

4.58

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.36
Q3
2.26
Median
1.33
Q1
0.86
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

AAPL vs. AFRM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AAPL

1.34

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
1.34
Q3
0.82
Median
0.42
Q1
0.16
Min
0.00

AAPL’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.34. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

AFRM

2.35

Financial Services Industry

Max
5.07
Q3
2.14
Median
0.55
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

AAPL vs. AFRM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AAPL

622.51

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
143.63
Q3
62.44
Median
17.59
Q1
5.32
Min
-23.93

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 622.51, AAPL demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

AFRM

-3.76

Financial Services Industry

Max
140.54
Q3
57.67
Median
6.72
Q1
1.93
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

AAPL vs. AFRM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAAPLAFRM
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.894.58
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.864.49
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.342.35
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)622.51-3.76

Growth

Revenue Growth

AAPL vs. AFRM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AAPL vs. AFRM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AAPL

0.39%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.93%
Q3
3.31%
Median
1.70%
Q1
0.01%
Min
0.00%

AAPL’s Dividend Yield of 0.39% is consistent with its peers in the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AFRM

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.52%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.75%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AFRM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AAPL vs. AFRM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AAPL

13.77%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
136.56%
Q3
76.58%
Median
35.95%
Q1
0.01%
Min
0.00%

AAPL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 13.77% is within the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AFRM

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
132.10%
Q3
64.32%
Median
17.51%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AFRM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AAPL vs. AFRM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAAPLAFRM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.39%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)13.77%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AAPL

35.42

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
43.58
Q3
27.14
Median
21.23
Q1
15.28
Min
8.31

A P/E Ratio of 35.42 places AAPL in the upper quartile for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

AFRM

96.53

Financial Services Industry

Max
46.13
Q3
28.79
Median
13.18
Q1
9.14
Min
0.47

At 96.53, AFRM’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Financial Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

AAPL vs. AFRM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AAPL

9.53

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
6.35
Q3
3.45
Median
0.96
Q1
0.46
Min
0.04

With a P/S Ratio of 9.53, AAPL trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

AFRM

6.50

Financial Services Industry

Max
9.71
Q3
4.81
Median
2.49
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

AAPL vs. AFRM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AAPL

51.21

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
13.94
Q3
8.15
Median
1.85
Q1
0.94
Min
0.32

At 51.21, AAPL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AFRM

7.21

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.21
Q3
3.51
Median
1.52
Q1
0.88
Min
0.08

AFRM’s P/B Ratio of 7.21 is in the upper tier for the Financial Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

AAPL vs. AFRM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAAPLAFRM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)35.4296.53
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)9.536.50
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)51.217.21
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)40.1629.25