Seek Returns logo

AAPL vs. ABNB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated

Here’s a clear look at AAPL and ABNB, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.

Company Overview

AAPL dominates in value with a market cap of 3,018.38 billion USD, eclipsing ABNB’s 79.88 billion USD by roughly 37.79×.

With betas of 1.27 for AAPL and 1.15 for ABNB, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.

SymbolAAPLABNB
Company NameApple Inc.Airbnb, Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyConsumer Cyclical
IndustryConsumer ElectronicsTravel Services
CEOMr. Timothy D. CookMr. Brian Chesky
Price202.09 USD127.52 USD
Market Cap3,018.38 billion USD79.88 billion USD
Beta1.271.15
ExchangeNASDAQNASDAQ
IPO DateDecember 12, 1980December 10, 2020
ADRNoNo

Performance Comparison

This chart compares the performance of AAPL and ABNB over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).

Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

Valuation Metrics Comparison

For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AAPL and ABNB, please refer to the table below.

SymbolAAPLABNB
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)31.1431.20
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)2.851.52
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)7.547.11
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)45.369.98
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)30.6518.16
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)22.2429.23
EV-to-Sales (TTM)7.716.64
EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM)31.3616.95

Dividend Comparison

AAPL delivers a 0.50% dividend yield, blending income with growth, whereas ABNB appears to retain its profits, possibly to fund operations, R&D, or other growth initiatives.

SymbolAAPLABNB
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.50%0.00%

Financial Strength Metrics Comparison

This section dives into the financial resilience of AAPL and ABNB, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.

  • AAPL’s current ratio of 0.82 signals a possible liquidity squeeze, while ABNB at 1.27 comfortably covers its short-term obligations.
  • AAPL’s quick ratio of 0.78 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas ABNB at 1.27 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
  • Neither AAPL nor ABNB records interest coverage (both “--”), indicating virtually no interest expense—usually a sign of negligible debt.
SymbolAAPLABNB
Current Ratio (TTM)0.821.27
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.781.27
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)1.470.29
Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM)0.300.09
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)----