AAL vs. TRI: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on October 9, 2025

Here’s a clear look at AAL and TRI, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	AAL	TRI
Company Name	American Airlines Group Inc.	Thomson Reuters Corporation
Country	United States	Canada
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry	Passenger Airlines	Professional Services
Market Capitalization	7.81 billion USD	68.52 billion USD
Exchange	NasdaqGS	NasdaqGS
Listing Date	September 27, 2005	June 12, 2002
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AAL and TRI by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AAL vs. TRI: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	AAL	TRI
5-Day Price Return	5.25%	-1.86%
13-Week Price Return	2.07%	-21.64%
26-Week Price Return	14.85%	-14.03%
52-Week Price Return	9.33%	-6.76%
Month-to-Date Return	5.25%	-1.21%
Year-to-Date Return	-32.13%	-7.51%
10-Day Avg. Volume	86.07M	0.57M
3-Month Avg. Volume	69.76M	0.44M
3-Month Volatility	51.23%	32.13%
Beta	1.27	0.33

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AAL

265.62%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 49.96%
Q3: 27.29%
Median: 16.68%
Q1: 8.40%
Min: -15.23%

AAL’s Return on Equity of 265.62% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Passenger Airlines industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

TRI

13.40%

Professional Services Industry

Max: 68.01%
Q3: 35.32%
Median: 21.92%
Q1: 11.67%
Min: -20.25%

TRI’s Return on Equity of 13.40% is on par with the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AAL vs. TRI: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AAL

1.05%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 16.00%
Q3: 8.99%
Median: 6.35%
Q1: 3.18%
Min: -4.22%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry, AAL’s Net Profit Margin of 1.05% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

TRI

22.34%

Professional Services Industry

Max: 31.75%
Q3: 15.50%
Median: 8.95%
Q1: 4.51%
Min: 0.35%

A Net Profit Margin of 22.34% places TRI in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

AAL vs. TRI: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AAL

3.82%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 22.47%
Q3: 12.67%
Median: 8.62%
Q1: 4.63%
Min: -2.30%

AAL’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.82% is in the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

TRI

29.19%

Professional Services Industry

Max: 30.62%
Q3: 19.06%
Median: 13.60%
Q1: 8.60%
Min: -2.18%

An Operating Profit Margin of 29.19% places TRI in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AAL vs. TRI: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	AAL	TRI
Return on Equity (TTM)	265.62%	13.40%
Return on Assets (TTM)	0.90%	8.92%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	1.05%	22.34%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	3.82%	29.19%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	64.95%	95.36%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AAL

0.58

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 1.44
Q3: 0.91
Median: 0.73
Q1: 0.54
Min: 0.18

AAL’s Current Ratio of 0.58 aligns with the median group of the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TRI

0.79

Professional Services Industry

Max: 2.28
Q3: 1.75
Median: 1.34
Q1: 1.10
Min: 0.47

TRI’s Current Ratio of 0.79 falls into the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AAL vs. TRI: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AAL

157.71

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 10.23
Q3: 5.04
Median: 1.27
Q1: 0.82
Min: 0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 157.71, AAL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Passenger Airlines industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

TRI

0.17

Professional Services Industry

Max: 2.93
Q3: 1.45
Median: 0.98
Q1: 0.45
Min: 0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry, TRI’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.17 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

AAL vs. TRI: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AAL

1.75

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 22.60
Q3: 17.27
Median: 6.75
Q1: 1.94
Min: -8.55

In the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry, AAL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.75 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

TRI

17.23

Professional Services Industry

Max: 39.45
Q3: 20.41
Median: 11.64
Q1: 5.46
Min: -1.21

TRI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 17.23 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AAL vs. TRI: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	AAL	TRI
Current Ratio (MRQ)	0.58	0.79
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.44	0.64
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	157.71	0.17
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	1.75	17.23

Growth

Revenue Growth

AAL vs. TRI: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AAL vs. TRI: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AAL

0.00%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 7.04%
Q3: 3.76%
Median: 1.72%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

AAL currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TRI

1.44%

Professional Services Industry

Max: 4.83%
Q3: 2.44%
Median: 1.52%
Q1: 0.52%
Min: 0.00%

TRI’s Dividend Yield of 1.44% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AAL vs. TRI: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AAL

0.00%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 99.73%
Q3: 50.30%
Median: 23.18%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

AAL has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TRI

60.86%

Professional Services Industry

Max: 128.51%
Q3: 69.03%
Median: 47.00%
Q1: 18.05%
Min: 0.00%

TRI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 60.86% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AAL vs. TRI: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	AAL	TRI
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	1.44%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	60.86%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AAL

13.48

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 18.74
Q3: 11.24
Median: 8.33
Q1: 6.11
Min: 2.97

A P/E Ratio of 13.48 places AAL in the upper quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

TRI

42.16

Professional Services Industry

Max: 52.60
Q3: 33.83
Median: 24.95
Q1: 17.59
Min: 7.96

A P/E Ratio of 42.16 places TRI in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

AAL vs. TRI: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AAL

0.14

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 1.07
Q3: 0.73
Median: 0.62
Q1: 0.40
Min: 0.09

In the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry, AAL’s P/S Ratio of 0.14 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

TRI

9.42

Professional Services Industry

Max: 8.27
Q3: 4.40
Median: 2.09
Q1: 0.99
Min: 0.17

With a P/S Ratio of 9.42, TRI trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Professional Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

AAL vs. TRI: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AAL

75.06

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max: 3.47
Q3: 3.19
Median: 1.94
Q1: 1.28
Min: 0.50

At 75.06, AAL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Passenger Airlines industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

TRI

7.00

Professional Services Industry

Max: 18.75
Q3: 9.53
Median: 5.88
Q1: 2.95
Min: 0.59

TRI’s P/B Ratio of 7.00 is within the conventional range for the Professional Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AAL vs. TRI: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	AAL	TRI
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	13.48	42.16
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	0.14	9.42
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	75.06	7.00
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	3.65	36.53