AAL vs. JBLU: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Company Overview

AAL dominates in value with a market cap of 7.41 billion USD, eclipsing JBLU’s 1.72 billion USD by roughly 4.31×.

With betas of 1.32 for AAL and 1.79 for JBLU, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.

Performance Comparison

This chart compares the performance of AAL and JBLU over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).

Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

Valuation Metrics Comparison

The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AAL and JBLU based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.

• JBLU shows a negative P/E of -5.98, highlighting a year of losses, whereas AAL at 10.81 trades on solid profitability.
• AAL has a negative P/B ratio of -1.64, indicating its liabilities exceed assets (negative equity). JBLU, with a P/B of 0.70, maintains positive shareholder equity.
• JBLU reports a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -1.35, showing a cash flow shortfall that could threaten its operational sustainability, while AAL at 2.11 maintains positive cash flow.

Dividend Comparison

Neither AAL nor JBLU currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.

Financial Strength Metrics Comparison

This section dives into the financial resilience of AAL and JBLU, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.

• With current ratios of 0.52 and 0.00, both AAL and JBLU have less current assets than short-term liabilities, which could strain their working capital and force reliance on additional financing.
• Both AAL (quick ratio 0.42) and JBLU (quick ratio 0.00) fall below 0.8, meaning their most liquid assets—excluding inventory—aren’t enough to meet short-term obligations. This could force them to rely on receivables, inventory turn, or external financing.
• AAL shows negative equity (debt-to-equity ratio -8.12), while JBLU is heavily leveraged (3.85), illustrating two different balance-sheet risks.
• AAL meets its interest obligations (ratio 1.25). In stark contrast, JBLU’s negative ratio (-0.30) means its operating earnings (EBIT) don't cover basic operations, let alone interest, signaling serious financial trouble.