Seek Returns logo

AAL vs. FLR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AAL and FLR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AAL’s market capitalization stands at 7.71 billion USD, while FLR’s is 8.69 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.

With betas of 1.38 for AAL and 1.30 for FLR, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolAALFLR
Company NameAmerican Airlines Group Inc.Fluor Corporation
CountryUSUS
SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
IndustryAirlines, Airports & Air ServicesEngineering & Construction
CEORobert D. Isom Jr.James R. Breuer
Price11.69 USD52.76 USD
Market Cap7.71 billion USD8.69 billion USD
Beta1.381.30
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateSeptember 27, 2005December 1, 2000
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AAL and FLR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AAL vs. FLR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AAL

-15.15%

Airlines, Airports & Air Services Industry

Max
42.21%
Q3
26.98%
Median
13.01%
Q1
0.37%
Min
-17.14%

AAL has a negative Return on Equity of -15.15%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

FLR

61.85%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
39.77%
Q3
28.08%
Median
13.64%
Q1
7.13%
Min
-14.48%

FLR’s Return on Equity of 61.85% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Engineering & Construction industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

AAL vs. FLR: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Airlines, Airports & Air Services and Engineering & Construction industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AAL

4.12%

Airlines, Airports & Air Services Industry

Max
17.34%
Q3
13.78%
Median
4.53%
Q1
1.05%
Min
-13.54%

AAL’s Return on Invested Capital of 4.12% is in line with the norm for the Airlines, Airports & Air Services industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

FLR

-0.10%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
22.01%
Q3
12.65%
Median
8.09%
Q1
4.79%
Min
-2.53%

FLR has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -0.10%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

AAL vs. FLR: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Airlines, Airports & Air Services and Engineering & Construction industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AAL

1.26%

Airlines, Airports & Air Services Industry

Max
24.88%
Q3
9.50%
Median
3.91%
Q1
-1.02%
Min
-10.56%

AAL’s Net Profit Margin of 1.26% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Airlines, Airports & Air Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

FLR

11.14%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
11.23%
Q3
6.47%
Median
3.96%
Q1
2.79%
Min
-2.45%

A Net Profit Margin of 11.14% places FLR in the upper quartile for the Engineering & Construction industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

AAL vs. FLR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Airlines, Airports & Air Services and Engineering & Construction industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AAL

4.31%

Airlines, Airports & Air Services Industry

Max
22.38%
Q3
14.22%
Median
9.66%
Q1
-0.09%
Min
-12.58%

AAL’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.31% is around the midpoint for the Airlines, Airports & Air Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FLR

3.03%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
13.74%
Q3
8.50%
Median
6.20%
Q1
4.58%
Min
0.34%

FLR’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.03% is in the lower quartile for the Engineering & Construction industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

AAL vs. FLR: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Airlines, Airports & Air Services and Engineering & Construction industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAALFLR
Return on Equity (TTM)-15.15%61.85%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.09%21.90%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)4.12%-0.10%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)1.26%11.14%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)4.31%3.03%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)23.28%3.71%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AAL

0.52

Airlines, Airports & Air Services Industry

Max
1.77
Q3
1.68
Median
0.77
Q1
0.62
Min
0.32

AAL’s Current Ratio of 0.52 falls into the lower quartile for the Airlines, Airports & Air Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

FLR

1.74

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
2.02
Q3
1.66
Median
1.38
Q1
1.24
Min
0.94

FLR’s Current Ratio of 1.74 is in the upper quartile for the Engineering & Construction industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

AAL vs. FLR: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Airlines, Airports & Air Services and Engineering & Construction industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AAL

-8.12

Airlines, Airports & Air Services Industry

Max
3.85
Q3
2.92
Median
1.02
Q1
0.43
Min
0.04

AAL has a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of -8.12, which indicates negative shareholder equity where liabilities exceed assets. This is a critical sign of financial distress.

FLR

0.30

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
1.76
Q3
0.91
Median
0.67
Q1
0.28
Min
0.01

FLR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.30 is typical for the Engineering & Construction industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AAL vs. FLR: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Airlines, Airports & Air Services and Engineering & Construction industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AAL

1.25

Airlines, Airports & Air Services Industry

Max
8.60
Q3
6.00
Median
4.19
Q1
1.03
Min
-1.40

AAL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.25 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Airlines, Airports & Air Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FLR

11.16

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
20.20
Q3
11.91
Median
6.46
Q1
3.18
Min
-2.69

FLR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.16 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Engineering & Construction industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AAL vs. FLR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Airlines, Airports & Air Services and Engineering & Construction industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAALFLR
Current Ratio (TTM)0.521.74
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.421.74
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)-8.120.30
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.580.13
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)8.51-2.22
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.2511.16

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AAL and FLR. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AAL vs. FLR: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AAL vs. FLR: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AAL vs. FLR: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AAL

0.00%

Airlines, Airports & Air Services Industry

Max
162.17%
Q3
2.10%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AAL currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FLR

0.00%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
1.31%
Q3
0.40%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FLR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AAL vs. FLR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Airlines, Airports & Air Services and Engineering & Construction industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AAL

0.00%

Airlines, Airports & Air Services Industry

Max
106.87%
Q3
15.62%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AAL has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FLR

0.00%

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
32.30%
Q3
7.09%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FLR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AAL vs. FLR: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Airlines, Airports & Air Services and Engineering & Construction industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAALFLR
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AAL

11.24

Airlines, Airports & Air Services Industry

Max
24.07
Q3
18.40
Median
12.44
Q1
11.24
Min
7.21

AAL’s P/E Ratio of 11.24 is within the middle range for the Airlines, Airports & Air Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FLR

4.84

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
95.41
Q3
56.70
Median
32.28
Q1
22.94
Min
4.72

In the lower quartile for the Engineering & Construction industry, FLR’s P/E Ratio of 4.84 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

AAL vs. FLR: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Airlines, Airports & Air Services and Engineering & Construction industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AAL

0.21

Airlines, Airports & Air Services Industry

Max
1.38
Q3
1.07
Median
0.61
Q1
0.32
Min
0.03

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Airlines, Airports & Air Services industry.

FLR

0.41

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
4.99
Q3
3.64
Median
2.51
Q1
1.64
Min
0.03

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Engineering & Construction industry.

AAL vs. FLR: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Airlines, Airports & Air Services and Engineering & Construction industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AAL

0.14

Airlines, Airports & Air Services Industry

Max
1.84
Q3
1.69
Median
0.98
Q1
0.45
Min
0.14

In the lower quartile for the Airlines, Airports & Air Services industry, AAL’s P/S Ratio of 0.14 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

FLR

0.52

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
3.34
Q3
2.05
Median
1.50
Q1
0.83
Min
0.44

In the lower quartile for the Engineering & Construction industry, FLR’s P/S Ratio of 0.52 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

AAL vs. FLR: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Airlines, Airports & Air Services and Engineering & Construction industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AAL

-1.71

Airlines, Airports & Air Services Industry

Max
12.86
Q3
8.15
Median
2.07
Q1
1.50
Min
0.62

AAL has a negative P/B Ratio of -1.71, indicating its liabilities exceed its assets and result in negative shareholder equity. This is a critical warning sign of financial distress.

FLR

2.49

Engineering & Construction Industry

Max
10.70
Q3
7.33
Median
4.69
Q1
2.53
Min
0.79

FLR’s P/B Ratio of 2.49 is in the lower quartile for the Engineering & Construction industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

AAL vs. FLR: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Airlines, Airports & Air Services and Engineering & Construction industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAALFLR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)11.244.84
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)0.210.41
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)0.140.52
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)-1.712.49
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)2.1916.97
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)10.3412.10
EV-to-Sales (TTM)0.800.44