Seek Returns logo

WING vs. YUM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at WING and YUM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolWINGYUM
Company NameWingstop Inc.Yum! Brands, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryHotels, Restaurants & LeisureHotels, Restaurants & Leisure
Market Capitalization9.19 billion USD41.45 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJune 12, 2015September 17, 1997
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of WING and YUM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

WING vs. YUM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolWINGYUM
5-Day Price Return1.13%1.75%
13-Week Price Return-1.32%-0.21%
26-Week Price Return5.56%0.40%
52-Week Price Return-14.46%9.25%
Month-to-Date Return-12.74%3.60%
Year-to-Date Return15.86%11.31%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.69M2.08M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.78M2.02M
3-Month Volatility66.67%20.88%
Beta1.820.73

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

WING

18.08%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
83.01%
Q3
39.51%
Median
17.38%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-45.92%

WING’s Return on Equity of 18.08% is on par with the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

YUM

117.64%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
83.01%
Q3
39.51%
Median
17.38%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-45.92%

YUM’s Return on Equity of 117.64% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

WING vs. YUM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

WING

25.61%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.45%
Q3
14.67%
Median
8.69%
Q1
3.34%
Min
-11.30%

A Net Profit Margin of 25.61% places WING in the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

YUM

18.11%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.45%
Q3
14.67%
Median
8.69%
Q1
3.34%
Min
-11.30%

A Net Profit Margin of 18.11% places YUM in the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

WING vs. YUM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

WING

24.66%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
38.76%
Q3
21.15%
Median
14.20%
Q1
6.43%
Min
-14.56%

An Operating Profit Margin of 24.66% places WING in the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

YUM

30.93%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
38.76%
Q3
21.15%
Median
14.20%
Q1
6.43%
Min
-14.56%

An Operating Profit Margin of 30.93% places YUM in the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

WING vs. YUM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolWINGYUM
Return on Equity (TTM)18.08%117.64%
Return on Assets (TTM)26.32%21.40%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)25.61%18.11%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)24.66%30.93%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)85.83%46.48%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

WING

4.37

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.68
Q3
1.62
Median
1.11
Q1
0.74
Min
0.19

WING’s Current Ratio of 4.37 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

YUM

0.82

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.68
Q3
1.62
Median
1.11
Q1
0.74
Min
0.19

YUM’s Current Ratio of 0.82 aligns with the median group of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

WING vs. YUM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

WING

--

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
9.88
Q3
4.54
Median
1.52
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

Debt-to-Equity Ratio data for WING is currently unavailable.

YUM

30.97

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
9.88
Q3
4.54
Median
1.52
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 30.97, YUM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

WING vs. YUM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

WING

7.91

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.88
Q3
11.95
Median
3.87
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

WING’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.91 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

YUM

4.68

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.88
Q3
11.95
Median
3.87
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

YUM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.68 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

WING vs. YUM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolWINGYUM
Current Ratio (MRQ)4.370.82
Quick Ratio (MRQ)4.240.64
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)--30.97
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)7.914.68

Growth

Revenue Growth

WING vs. YUM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

WING vs. YUM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

WING

0.33%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
5.88%
Q3
2.37%
Median
0.68%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

WING’s Dividend Yield of 0.33% is consistent with its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

YUM

1.91%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
5.88%
Q3
2.37%
Median
0.68%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

YUM’s Dividend Yield of 1.91% is consistent with its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

WING vs. YUM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

WING

18.32%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
127.31%
Q3
56.79%
Median
19.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

WING’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 18.32% is within the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

YUM

53.77%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
127.31%
Q3
56.79%
Median
19.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

YUM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 53.77% is within the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

WING vs. YUM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolWINGYUM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.33%1.91%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)18.32%53.77%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

WING

55.12

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
59.44
Q3
33.98
Median
22.25
Q1
15.53
Min
7.61

A P/E Ratio of 55.12 places WING in the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

YUM

28.18

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
59.44
Q3
33.98
Median
22.25
Q1
15.53
Min
7.61

YUM’s P/E Ratio of 28.18 is within the middle range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

WING vs. YUM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

WING

14.12

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.74
Q3
3.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.19
Min
0.17

With a P/S Ratio of 14.12, WING trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

YUM

5.10

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.74
Q3
3.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.19
Min
0.17

YUM’s P/S Ratio of 5.10 is in the upper echelon for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

WING vs. YUM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

WING

--

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
20.90
Q3
9.78
Median
4.29
Q1
2.22
Min
0.47

P/B Ratio data for WING is currently unavailable.

YUM

208.10

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
20.90
Q3
9.78
Median
4.29
Q1
2.22
Min
0.47

At 208.10, YUM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

WING vs. YUM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolWINGYUM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)55.1228.18
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)14.125.10
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)--208.10
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)96.4126.29