Seek Returns

WDS vs. WMB: Woodside Energy vs. Williams Stock Comparison

How do Woodside Energy (WDS) and Williams (WMB) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Woodside Energy (WDS) and Williams (WMB) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though WDS is classified under Oil & Gas Exploration & Production while WMB falls under Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation.

Williams (WMB) trades as ordinary local shares, while Woodside Energy (WDS) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Company profile comparison for Woodside Energy (WDS) and Williams (WMB)
Profile ItemWDSWMB
NameWoodside Energy Group Ltd ADRThe Williams Companies, Inc.
Country/RegionAustraliaUnited States
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS Industry GroupEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
GICS Sub-IndustryOil & Gas Exploration & ProductionOil & Gas Storage & Transportation
Market Capitalization40.00 billion USD80.11 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateNovember 18, 1996December 31, 1981
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

WDS
WMB
GSPC
Loading price history…
Woodside Energy (WDS) vs. Williams (WMB), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Woodside Energy (WDS) and Williams (WMB). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Woodside Energy (WDS) and Williams (WMB). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Woodside Energy (WDS) and Williams (WMB)
MetricWDSWMB
Total Return (1Y)30.30%14.81%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)5.67%28.70%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)11.65%23.72%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

WDS
WMB
GSPC
Loading price history…
Woodside Energy (WDS) vs. Williams (WMB), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Woodside Energy (WDS) and Williams (WMB). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Woodside Energy (WDS) and Williams (WMB)
MetricWDSWMB
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)33.53%26.38%
Beta (5Y)0.380.65
Max Drawdown (5Y)-48.77%-23.01%
Avg. Volume (3M)570.04K7.88M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
WDS and WMB are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Woodside Energy (WDS) and Williams (WMB)
MetricWDSWMB
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)0.780.40
Sortino Ratio (1Y)1.110.56

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both Woodside Energy (WDS) at 7.68% and Williams (WMB) at 18.31% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

WDS

Energy industry group

7.68%

Max
53.85%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
WDS
7.68%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%

WMB

Energy industry group

18.31%

Max
53.85%
Q3
24.79%
WMB
18.31%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%
Loading chart…
Woodside Energy (WDS) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their ROE against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Williams (WMB) at 24.66% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Woodside Energy (WDS) at 22.21%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

WDS

Energy industry group

22.21%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
WDS
22.21%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%

WMB

Energy industry group

24.66%

Max
56.92%
WMB
24.66%
Q3
22.92%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%
Loading chart…
Woodside Energy (WDS) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their net margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Woodside Energy (WDS) at 23.91% and Williams (WMB) at 32.69% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

WDS

Energy industry group

23.91%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
WDS
23.91%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%

WMB

Energy industry group

32.69%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
WMB
32.69%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%
Loading chart…
Woodside Energy (WDS) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their operating margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Woodside Energy (WDS) and Williams (WMB)
MetricWDSWMB
ROE (TTM)7.68%18.31%
ROA (TTM)2.83%4.59%
Net Margin (TTM)22.21%24.66%
Operating Margin (TTM)23.91%32.69%
Gross Margin (TTM)34.92%63.05%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both Woodside Energy (WDS) at -1.48% and Williams (WMB) at 13.78% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
Woodside Energy (WDS) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Both Woodside Energy (WDS) at -24.02% and Williams (WMB) at 17.58% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
Woodside Energy (WDS) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Woodside Energy (WDS) and Williams (WMB)
MetricWDSWMB
Revenue Growth (YoY)-1.48%13.78%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)-8.26%2.91%
EPS Growth (YoY)-24.02%17.58%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)-30.68%8.62%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Woodside Energy (WDS) at 1.39 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Williams (WMB) at 0.75 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for WMB.

WDS

Energy industry group

1.39

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
WDS
1.39
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24

WMB

Energy industry group

0.75

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
WMB
0.75
Min
0.24
Loading chart…
Woodside Energy (WDS) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their current ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Woodside Energy (WDS) at 0.33 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Williams (WMB) at 1.58 uses more debt funding than most peers.

WDS

Energy industry group

0.33

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
WDS
0.33
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

WMB

Energy industry group

1.58

Max
1.75
WMB
1.58
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Woodside Energy (WDS) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Woodside Energy (WDS) and Williams (WMB)
MetricWDSWMB
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.390.75
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.331.58
Net Debt / EBITDA1.154.58

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Woodside Energy (WDS) at 5.41% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Williams (WMB) at 3.23% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, WDS the richer one.

WDS

Energy industry group

5.41%

Max
8.57%
WDS
5.41%
Q3
3.58%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

WMB

Energy industry group

3.23%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
WMB
3.23%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Woodside Energy (WDS) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both Woodside Energy (WDS) at 69.78% and Williams (WMB) at 81.69% pay out an above-typical share of earnings for their industries, leaving thinner cover if profits dip.

WDS

Energy industry group

69.78%

Max
133.24%
WDS
69.78%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

WMB

Energy industry group

81.69%

Max
133.24%
WMB
81.69%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Woodside Energy (WDS) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Woodside Energy (WDS) and Williams (WMB)
MetricWDSWMB
Dividend Yield (TTM)5.41%3.23%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)69.78%81.69%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Woodside Energy (WDS) at 13.15 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Williams (WMB) at 25.23 sits in the richer quartile — WMB needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

WDS

Energy industry group

13.15

Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
WDS
13.15
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99

WMB

Energy industry group

25.23

Max
39.54
WMB
25.23
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99
Loading chart…
Woodside Energy (WDS) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Both look expensive on sales: Woodside Energy (WDS) at 2.89 sits in the upper P/S ratio quartile, and Williams (WMB) at 6.32 prices even higher, above its industry range.

WDS

Energy industry group

2.89

Max
5.40
WDS
2.89
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00

WMB

Energy industry group

6.32

WMB
6.32
Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Woodside Energy (WDS) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Woodside Energy (WDS) at 1.11 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Williams (WMB) at 5.11 prices above its benchmark range — WMB looks rich relative to book.

WDS

Energy industry group

1.11

Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
WDS
1.11
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01

WMB

Energy industry group

5.11

WMB
5.11
Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01
Loading chart…
Woodside Energy (WDS) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Woodside Energy (WDS) and Williams (WMB)
MetricWDSWMB
P/E Ratio (TTM)13.1525.23
P/S Ratio (TTM)2.896.32
P/B Ratio (MRQ)1.115.11
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)1.41%-3.56%