Seek Returns logo

WB vs. ZG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at WB and ZG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

WB trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, ZG is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolWBZG
Company NameWeibo CorporationZillow Group, Inc.
CountryChinaUnited States
GICS SectorCommunication ServicesReal Estate
GICS IndustryInteractive Media & ServicesReal Estate Management & Development
Market Capitalization2.87 billion USD20.89 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateApril 17, 2014July 20, 2011
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of WB and ZG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

WB vs. ZG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolWBZG
5-Day Price Return-1.19%4.12%
13-Week Price Return22.54%33.69%
26-Week Price Return5.77%8.91%
52-Week Price Return-7.57%62.29%
Month-to-Date Return18.81%9.29%
Year-to-Date Return22.54%17.41%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.30M3.27M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.16M2.38M
3-Month Volatility32.81%33.04%
Beta1.492.17

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

WB

10.37%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
49.37%
Q3
29.69%
Median
9.73%
Q1
2.47%
Min
-26.19%

WB’s Return on Equity of 10.37% is on par with the norm for the Interactive Media & Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ZG

-1.30%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
14.65%
Q3
8.92%
Median
3.63%
Q1
1.63%
Min
-8.05%

ZG has a negative Return on Equity of -1.30%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

WB vs. ZG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

WB

17.14%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
50.41%
Q3
29.38%
Median
17.14%
Q1
3.13%
Min
-30.88%

WB’s Net Profit Margin of 17.14% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Interactive Media & Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ZG

-2.60%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
57.16%
Q3
24.60%
Median
9.48%
Q1
2.61%
Min
-26.61%

ZG has a negative Net Profit Margin of -2.60%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

WB vs. ZG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

WB

22.85%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
65.96%
Q3
36.95%
Median
18.60%
Q1
5.69%
Min
-18.13%

WB’s Operating Profit Margin of 22.85% is around the midpoint for the Interactive Media & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ZG

-5.61%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
92.29%
Q3
43.61%
Median
20.96%
Q1
6.44%
Min
-48.90%

ZG has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -5.61%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

WB vs. ZG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolWBZG
Return on Equity (TTM)10.37%-1.30%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.33%-1.07%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)17.14%-2.60%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)22.85%-5.61%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)78.94%75.75%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

WB

2.72

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
4.30
Q3
2.68
Median
1.96
Q1
1.21
Min
0.45

WB’s Current Ratio of 2.72 is in the upper quartile for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

ZG

3.34

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
3.73
Q3
2.22
Median
1.42
Q1
1.03
Min
0.04

ZG’s Current Ratio of 3.34 is in the upper quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

WB vs. ZG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

WB

0.54

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
0.90
Q3
0.47
Median
0.16
Q1
0.03
Min
0.00

WB’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Interactive Media & Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.54. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

ZG

0.05

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
2.62
Q3
1.30
Median
0.84
Q1
0.39
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, ZG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.05 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

WB vs. ZG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

WB

1.55

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
67.60
Q3
29.41
Median
6.36
Q1
-0.87
Min
-37.02

WB’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.55 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Interactive Media & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ZG

-1.97

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
23.14
Q3
12.97
Median
3.68
Q1
1.29
Min
-4.45

ZG has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -1.97. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

WB vs. ZG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolWBZG
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.723.34
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.433.23
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.540.05
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.55-1.97

Growth

Revenue Growth

WB vs. ZG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

WB vs. ZG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

WB

0.00%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
1.87%
Q3
1.08%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

WB currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ZG

0.00%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
6.79%
Q3
3.51%
Median
2.22%
Q1
0.52%
Min
0.00%

ZG currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

WB vs. ZG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

WB

0.00%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
87.35%
Q3
38.67%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

WB has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ZG

0.00%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
242.45%
Q3
106.13%
Median
55.27%
Q1
14.97%
Min
0.00%

ZG has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

WB vs. ZG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolWBZG
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

WB

8.09

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
87.79
Q3
54.33
Median
25.46
Q1
18.76
Min
6.96

In the lower quartile for the Interactive Media & Services industry, WB’s P/E Ratio of 8.09 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

ZG

--

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
41.09
Q3
23.50
Median
17.29
Q1
11.14
Min
6.36

P/E Ratio data for ZG is currently unavailable.

WB vs. ZG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

WB

1.65

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
19.01
Q3
12.39
Median
6.49
Q1
1.94
Min
0.22

In the lower quartile for the Interactive Media & Services industry, WB’s P/S Ratio of 1.65 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

ZG

8.01

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
12.22
Q3
5.64
Median
2.53
Q1
0.98
Min
0.01

ZG’s P/S Ratio of 8.01 is in the upper echelon for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

WB vs. ZG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

WB

0.68

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
11.66
Q3
7.17
Median
4.17
Q1
2.80
Min
0.12

WB’s P/B Ratio of 0.68 is in the lower quartile for the Interactive Media & Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

ZG

3.54

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
2.36
Q3
1.18
Median
0.75
Q1
0.35
Min
0.06

At 3.54, ZG’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

WB vs. ZG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolWBZG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)8.09--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.658.01
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)0.683.54
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)--75.01