Seek Returns logo

WAT vs. ZTS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at WAT and ZTS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolWATZTS
Company NameWaters CorporationZoetis Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryLife Sciences Tools & ServicesPharmaceuticals
Market Capitalization17.54 billion USD68.86 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateNovember 17, 1995February 1, 2013
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of WAT and ZTS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

WAT vs. ZTS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolWATZTS
5-Day Price Return1.44%-0.15%
13-Week Price Return-17.78%-6.55%
26-Week Price Return-21.39%-3.17%
52-Week Price Return-12.47%-14.43%
Month-to-Date Return2.03%6.57%
Year-to-Date Return-20.58%-4.64%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.55M2.63M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.69M3.11M
3-Month Volatility38.81%22.62%
Beta1.060.92

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

WAT

35.02%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
19.96%
Q3
11.55%
Median
6.22%
Q1
3.86%
Min
-6.95%

WAT’s Return on Equity of 35.02% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

ZTS

53.21%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
38.59%
Q3
19.84%
Median
11.90%
Q1
5.63%
Min
-9.96%

ZTS’s Return on Equity of 53.21% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

WAT vs. ZTS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

WAT

21.71%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
27.28%
Q3
16.17%
Median
7.24%
Q1
3.00%
Min
-3.05%

A Net Profit Margin of 21.71% places WAT in the upper quartile for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ZTS

27.83%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
34.51%
Q3
17.73%
Median
12.12%
Q1
5.99%
Min
-7.73%

A Net Profit Margin of 27.83% places ZTS in the upper quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

WAT vs. ZTS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

WAT

27.69%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
33.15%
Q3
19.34%
Median
13.02%
Q1
8.05%
Min
-4.38%

An Operating Profit Margin of 27.69% places WAT in the upper quartile for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ZTS

35.35%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
41.53%
Q3
23.00%
Median
16.24%
Q1
9.24%
Min
-6.94%

An Operating Profit Margin of 35.35% places ZTS in the upper quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

WAT vs. ZTS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolWATZTS
Return on Equity (TTM)35.02%53.21%
Return on Assets (TTM)14.40%18.27%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)21.71%27.83%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)27.69%35.35%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)59.02%71.50%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

WAT

1.75

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
4.76
Q3
2.77
Median
1.85
Q1
1.40
Min
0.43

WAT’s Current Ratio of 1.75 aligns with the median group of the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ZTS

1.76

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
4.49
Q3
2.77
Median
1.74
Q1
1.26
Min
0.11

ZTS’s Current Ratio of 1.76 aligns with the median group of the Pharmaceuticals industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

WAT vs. ZTS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

WAT

0.67

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.75
Q3
0.83
Median
0.41
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

WAT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.67 is typical for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ZTS

1.32

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
2.44
Q3
1.07
Median
0.42
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

ZTS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Pharmaceuticals industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.32. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

WAT vs. ZTS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

WAT

11.29

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
29.61
Q3
23.24
Median
6.07
Q1
2.18
Min
-14.08

WAT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.29 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ZTS

15.44

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
103.95
Q3
44.18
Median
9.83
Q1
2.82
Min
-42.71

ZTS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 15.44 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Pharmaceuticals industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

WAT vs. ZTS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolWATZTS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.751.76
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.221.04
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.671.32
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)11.2915.44

Growth

Revenue Growth

WAT vs. ZTS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

WAT vs. ZTS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

WAT

0.00%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.80%
Q3
0.78%
Median
0.37%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

WAT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ZTS

1.24%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
6.98%
Q3
3.32%
Median
2.13%
Q1
0.14%
Min
0.00%

ZTS’s Dividend Yield of 1.24% is consistent with its peers in the Pharmaceuticals industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

WAT vs. ZTS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

WAT

0.00%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
156.00%
Q3
65.73%
Median
23.81%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

WAT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ZTS

32.08%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
165.20%
Q3
90.59%
Median
49.13%
Q1
28.91%
Min
0.00%

ZTS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 32.08% is within the typical range for the Pharmaceuticals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

WAT vs. ZTS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolWATZTS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.24%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%32.08%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

WAT

26.76

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
117.96
Q3
65.59
Median
37.26
Q1
27.51
Min
1.73

In the lower quartile for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, WAT’s P/E Ratio of 26.76 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

ZTS

25.93

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
42.51
Q3
26.88
Median
19.11
Q1
15.12
Min
0.00

ZTS’s P/E Ratio of 25.93 is within the middle range for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

WAT vs. ZTS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

WAT

5.81

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
12.46
Q3
6.70
Median
4.24
Q1
2.68
Min
0.73

WAT’s P/S Ratio of 5.81 aligns with the market consensus for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ZTS

7.22

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
7.55
Q3
4.54
Median
2.11
Q1
1.52
Min
0.00

ZTS’s P/S Ratio of 7.22 is in the upper echelon for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

WAT vs. ZTS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

WAT

9.62

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
7.99
Q3
4.69
Median
3.30
Q1
1.88
Min
1.02

At 9.62, WAT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ZTS

13.95

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
9.78
Q3
4.96
Median
2.23
Q1
1.46
Min
0.60

At 13.95, ZTS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Pharmaceuticals industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

WAT vs. ZTS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolWATZTS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)26.7625.93
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.817.22
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)9.6213.95
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)28.5730.52