Seek Returns logo

VRT vs. XPO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at VRT and XPO, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolVRTXPO
Company NameVertiv Holdings CoXPO, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryElectrical EquipmentGround Transportation
Market Capitalization63.92 billion USD16.20 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateAugust 2, 2018October 7, 2003
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of VRT and XPO by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

VRT vs. XPO: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolVRTXPO
5-Day Price Return3.55%8.47%
13-Week Price Return30.39%4.12%
26-Week Price Return148.08%43.30%
52-Week Price Return56.83%30.59%
Month-to-Date Return10.95%6.43%
Year-to-Date Return47.33%4.90%
10-Day Avg. Volume6.90M1.12M
3-Month Avg. Volume7.10M1.19M
3-Month Volatility47.72%40.17%
Beta2.022.10

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

VRT

32.36%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
35.67%
Q3
23.64%
Median
11.74%
Q1
6.08%
Min
-4.39%

In the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, VRT’s Return on Equity of 32.36% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

XPO

20.71%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
23.35%
Q3
13.74%
Median
9.05%
Q1
6.86%
Min
1.73%

In the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, XPO’s Return on Equity of 20.71% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

VRT vs. XPO: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

VRT

8.93%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
20.60%
Q3
10.26%
Median
5.83%
Q1
2.92%
Min
-0.75%

VRT’s Net Profit Margin of 8.93% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

XPO

4.31%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.19%
Q3
17.08%
Median
7.19%
Q1
4.45%
Min
-5.54%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, XPO’s Net Profit Margin of 4.31% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

VRT vs. XPO: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

VRT

13.20%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
26.24%
Q3
14.53%
Median
7.97%
Q1
3.45%
Min
-5.64%

VRT’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.20% is around the midpoint for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

XPO

8.35%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.90%
Q3
23.80%
Median
10.93%
Q1
7.06%
Min
-12.94%

XPO’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.35% is around the midpoint for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

VRT vs. XPO: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolVRTXPO
Return on Equity (TTM)32.36%20.71%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.58%4.36%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)8.93%4.31%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)13.20%8.35%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)35.29%59.99%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

VRT

1.74

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.31
Q3
2.09
Median
1.48
Q1
1.09
Min
0.85

VRT’s Current Ratio of 1.74 aligns with the median group of the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

XPO

1.02

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.00
Q3
1.31
Median
0.98
Q1
0.74
Min
0.35

XPO’s Current Ratio of 1.02 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

VRT vs. XPO: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

VRT

0.93

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
1.57
Q3
0.96
Median
0.57
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

VRT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.93 is typical for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

XPO

1.91

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.48
Median
1.02
Q1
0.48
Min
0.00

XPO’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Ground Transportation industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.91. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

VRT vs. XPO: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

VRT

2.36

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
44.15
Q3
19.29
Median
9.38
Q1
0.98
Min
-19.47

VRT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.36 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

XPO

3.12

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
59.80
Q3
25.78
Median
8.23
Q1
2.52
Min
-24.57

XPO’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.12 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

VRT vs. XPO: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolVRTXPO
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.741.02
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.351.02
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.931.91
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.363.12

Growth

Revenue Growth

VRT vs. XPO: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

VRT vs. XPO: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

VRT

0.08%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.04%
Q3
1.58%
Median
1.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VRT’s Dividend Yield of 0.08% is consistent with its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

XPO

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.29%
Q3
2.57%
Median
1.59%
Q1
0.71%
Min
0.00%

XPO currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

VRT vs. XPO: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

VRT

6.39%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
165.68%
Q3
71.84%
Median
38.15%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VRT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.39% is within the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

XPO

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
149.12%
Q3
75.08%
Median
41.35%
Q1
16.42%
Min
0.00%

XPO has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

VRT vs. XPO: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolVRTXPO
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.08%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)6.39%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

VRT

78.63

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
65.02
Q3
38.99
Median
27.41
Q1
19.88
Min
8.37

At 78.63, VRT’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Electrical Equipment industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

XPO

44.70

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
39.04
Q3
24.45
Median
17.51
Q1
12.92
Min
5.87

At 44.70, XPO’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

VRT vs. XPO: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

VRT

7.02

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
7.01
Q3
4.03
Median
1.79
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

With a P/S Ratio of 7.02, VRT trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Electrical Equipment industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

XPO

1.93

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.82
Q3
2.22
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24

XPO’s P/S Ratio of 1.93 aligns with the market consensus for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

VRT vs. XPO: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

VRT

15.66

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
10.97
Q3
5.57
Median
3.50
Q1
1.66
Min
0.64

At 15.66, VRT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electrical Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

XPO

8.35

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.27
Q3
3.03
Median
1.40
Q1
1.18
Min
0.67

At 8.35, XPO’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

VRT vs. XPO: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolVRTXPO
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)78.6344.70
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)7.021.93
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)15.668.35
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)51.4173.43
VRT vs. XPO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison