Seek Returns logo

VRT vs. WM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at VRT and WM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolVRTWM
Company NameVertiv Holdings CoWaste Management, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryElectrical EquipmentCommercial Services & Supplies
Market Capitalization48.70 billion USD92.66 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateAugust 2, 2018June 22, 1988
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of VRT and WM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

VRT vs. WM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolVRTWM
5-Day Price Return-3.76%1.72%
13-Week Price Return19.87%-0.83%
26-Week Price Return16.71%1.07%
52-Week Price Return61.69%11.35%
Month-to-Date Return-12.40%0.38%
Year-to-Date Return12.26%13.99%
10-Day Avg. Volume6.25M2.05M
3-Month Avg. Volume7.70M1.72M
3-Month Volatility40.24%16.51%
Beta1.870.66

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

VRT

32.36%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
37.56%
Q3
20.60%
Median
14.38%
Q1
4.35%
Min
0.90%

In the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, VRT’s Return on Equity of 32.36% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

WM

31.93%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
18.03%
Median
9.43%
Q1
6.44%
Min
-9.69%

In the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, WM’s Return on Equity of 31.93% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

VRT vs. WM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

VRT

8.93%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
20.43%
Q3
10.97%
Median
6.07%
Q1
3.16%
Min
0.29%

VRT’s Net Profit Margin of 8.93% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

WM

11.36%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
17.53%
Q3
9.01%
Median
5.20%
Q1
2.75%
Min
-2.31%

A Net Profit Margin of 11.36% places WM in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

VRT vs. WM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

VRT

13.20%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
26.20%
Q3
14.31%
Median
7.54%
Q1
3.77%
Min
-5.64%

VRT’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.20% is around the midpoint for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

WM

17.52%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.43%
Q3
12.19%
Median
8.10%
Q1
3.18%
Min
-6.03%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.52% places WM in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

VRT vs. WM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolVRTWM
Return on Equity (TTM)32.36%31.93%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.58%6.42%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)8.93%11.36%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)13.20%17.52%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)35.29%39.72%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

VRT

1.74

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.02
Q3
1.99
Median
1.41
Q1
1.07
Min
0.80

VRT’s Current Ratio of 1.74 aligns with the median group of the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

WM

0.86

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
1.89
Median
1.38
Q1
0.87
Min
0.53

WM’s Current Ratio of 0.86 falls into the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

VRT vs. WM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

VRT

0.93

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
1.44
Q3
0.99
Median
0.56
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

VRT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.93 is typical for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

WM

2.61

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
1.67
Q3
1.08
Median
0.73
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.61, WM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Commercial Services & Supplies industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

VRT vs. WM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

VRT

2.36

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
36.12
Q3
19.29
Median
9.38
Q1
1.16
Min
-10.92

VRT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.36 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

WM

6.82

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
12.37
Median
7.16
Q1
2.69
Min
-10.97

WM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.82 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

VRT vs. WM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolVRTWM
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.740.86
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.350.86
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.932.61
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.366.82

Growth

Revenue Growth

VRT vs. WM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

VRT vs. WM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

VRT

0.11%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
2.20%
Q3
1.53%
Median
1.01%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VRT’s Dividend Yield of 0.11% is consistent with its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

WM

1.37%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.44%
Q3
2.30%
Median
1.37%
Q1
0.63%
Min
0.00%

WM’s Dividend Yield of 1.37% is consistent with its peers in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

VRT vs. WM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

VRT

6.39%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
119.44%
Q3
51.87%
Median
27.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VRT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.39% is within the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

WM

46.71%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
72.93%
Median
40.45%
Q1
23.31%
Min
0.00%

WM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 46.71% is within the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

VRT vs. WM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolVRTWM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.11%1.37%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)6.39%46.71%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

VRT

59.82

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
81.85
Q3
44.17
Median
27.61
Q1
18.62
Min
7.73

A P/E Ratio of 59.82 places VRT in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

WM

34.02

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.20
Q3
37.10
Median
22.38
Q1
16.35
Min
0.00

WM’s P/E Ratio of 34.02 is within the middle range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

VRT vs. WM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

VRT

5.34

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
8.18
Q3
4.02
Median
1.84
Q1
0.97
Min
0.44

VRT’s P/S Ratio of 5.34 is in the upper echelon for the Electrical Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

WM

3.86

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.64
Q3
2.28
Median
0.97
Q1
0.64
Min
0.00

WM’s P/S Ratio of 3.86 is in the upper echelon for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

VRT vs. WM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

VRT

15.66

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
8.50
Q3
4.53
Median
3.39
Q1
1.70
Min
0.51

At 15.66, VRT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electrical Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

WM

10.01

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.71
Q3
4.38
Median
2.39
Q1
1.57
Min
0.43

At 10.01, WM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

VRT vs. WM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolVRTWM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)59.8234.02
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.343.86
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)15.6610.01
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)39.1142.79