VRT vs. WAB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 24, 2025

Here’s a clear look at VRT and WAB, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	VRT	WAB
Company Name	Vertiv Holdings Co	Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry	Electrical Equipment	Machinery
Market Capitalization	48.70 billion USD	32.97 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	August 2, 2018	June 16, 1995
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of VRT and WAB by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

VRT vs. WAB: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	VRT	WAB
5-Day Price Return	-3.76%	0.98%
13-Week Price Return	19.87%	-6.91%
26-Week Price Return	16.71%	-1.85%
52-Week Price Return	61.69%	19.80%
Month-to-Date Return	-12.40%	0.42%
Year-to-Date Return	12.26%	1.72%
10-Day Avg. Volume	6.25M	1.05M
3-Month Avg. Volume	7.70M	1.02M
3-Month Volatility	40.24%	20.33%
Beta	1.87	1.11

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

VRT

32.36%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 37.56%
Q3: 20.60%
Median: 14.38%
Q1: 4.35%
Min: 0.90%

In the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, VRT’s Return on Equity of 32.36% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

WAB

11.11%

Machinery Industry

Max: 34.68%
Q3: 19.06%
Median: 13.13%
Q1: 8.53%
Min: -4.87%

WAB’s Return on Equity of 11.11% is on par with the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

VRT vs. WAB: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

VRT

8.93%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 20.43%
Q3: 10.97%
Median: 6.07%
Q1: 3.16%
Min: 0.29%

VRT’s Net Profit Margin of 8.93% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

WAB

10.92%

Machinery Industry

Max: 19.74%
Q3: 11.24%
Median: 8.13%
Q1: 5.38%
Min: -1.11%

WAB’s Net Profit Margin of 10.92% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Machinery industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

VRT vs. WAB: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

VRT

13.20%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 26.20%
Q3: 14.31%
Median: 7.54%
Q1: 3.77%
Min: -5.64%

VRT’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.20% is around the midpoint for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

WAB

16.22%

Machinery Industry

Max: 26.63%
Q3: 16.15%
Median: 11.27%
Q1: 7.72%
Min: -4.91%

An Operating Profit Margin of 16.22% places WAB in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

VRT vs. WAB: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	VRT	WAB
Return on Equity (TTM)	32.36%	11.11%
Return on Assets (TTM)	8.58%	6.00%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	8.93%	10.92%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	13.20%	16.22%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	35.29%	33.57%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

VRT

1.74

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 3.02
Q3: 1.99
Median: 1.41
Q1: 1.07
Min: 0.80

VRT’s Current Ratio of 1.74 aligns with the median group of the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

WAB

1.76

Machinery Industry

Max: 3.83
Q3: 2.32
Median: 1.72
Q1: 1.28
Min: 0.78

WAB’s Current Ratio of 1.76 aligns with the median group of the Machinery industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

VRT vs. WAB: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

VRT

0.93

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 1.44
Q3: 0.99
Median: 0.56
Q1: 0.24
Min: 0.00

VRT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.93 is typical for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

WAB

0.44

Machinery Industry

Max: 1.49
Q3: 0.75
Median: 0.44
Q1: 0.26
Min: 0.00

WAB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.44 is typical for the Machinery industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

VRT vs. WAB: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

VRT

2.36

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 36.12
Q3: 19.29
Median: 9.38
Q1: 1.16
Min: -10.92

VRT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.36 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

WAB

7.65

Machinery Industry

Max: 67.55
Q3: 33.79
Median: 13.87
Q1: 7.97
Min: -1.43

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, WAB’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.65 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

VRT vs. WAB: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	VRT	WAB
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.74	1.76
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.35	1.05
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.93	0.44
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	2.36	7.65

Growth

Revenue Growth

VRT vs. WAB: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

VRT vs. WAB: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

VRT

0.11%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 2.20%
Q3: 1.53%
Median: 1.01%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

VRT’s Dividend Yield of 0.11% is consistent with its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

WAB

0.47%

Machinery Industry

Max: 5.32%
Q3: 2.84%
Median: 1.87%
Q1: 1.09%
Min: 0.00%

WAB’s Dividend Yield of 0.47% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

VRT vs. WAB: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

VRT

6.39%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 119.44%
Q3: 51.87%
Median: 27.71%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

VRT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.39% is within the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

WAB

13.53%

Machinery Industry

Max: 202.17%
Q3: 98.65%
Median: 55.54%
Q1: 29.03%
Min: 0.00%

WAB’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 13.53% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

VRT vs. WAB: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	VRT	WAB
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.11%	0.47%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	6.39%	13.53%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

VRT

59.82

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 81.85
Q3: 44.17
Median: 27.61
Q1: 18.62
Min: 7.73

A P/E Ratio of 59.82 places VRT in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

WAB

28.50

Machinery Industry

Max: 53.66
Q3: 31.29
Median: 22.00
Q1: 16.18
Min: 7.00

WAB’s P/E Ratio of 28.50 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

VRT vs. WAB: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

VRT

5.34

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 8.18
Q3: 4.02
Median: 1.84
Q1: 0.97
Min: 0.44

VRT’s P/S Ratio of 5.34 is in the upper echelon for the Electrical Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

WAB

3.11

Machinery Industry

Max: 5.04
Q3: 2.72
Median: 1.67
Q1: 1.04
Min: 0.24

WAB’s P/S Ratio of 3.11 is in the upper echelon for the Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

VRT vs. WAB: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

VRT

15.66

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 8.50
Q3: 4.53
Median: 3.39
Q1: 1.70
Min: 0.51

At 15.66, VRT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electrical Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

WAB

3.32

Machinery Industry

Max: 7.23
Q3: 3.90
Median: 2.52
Q1: 1.47
Min: 0.49

WAB’s P/B Ratio of 3.32 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

VRT vs. WAB: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	VRT	WAB
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	59.82	28.50
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	5.34	3.11
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	15.66	3.32
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	39.11	22.63