Seek Returns logo

VRSK vs. XYL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at VRSK and XYL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolVRSKXYL
Company NameVerisk Analytics, Inc.Xylem Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryProfessional ServicesMachinery
Market Capitalization37.84 billion USD34.53 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateOctober 7, 2009October 13, 2011
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of VRSK and XYL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

VRSK vs. XYL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolVRSKXYL
5-Day Price Return1.18%0.02%
13-Week Price Return-13.84%10.84%
26-Week Price Return-8.34%8.22%
52-Week Price Return0.62%5.57%
Month-to-Date Return-2.82%-1.90%
Year-to-Date Return-1.66%22.28%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.15M1.03M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.93M1.35M
3-Month Volatility21.38%24.81%
Beta0.881.14

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

VRSK

439.17%

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.17%
Q3
30.06%
Median
22.21%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-13.44%

VRSK’s Return on Equity of 439.17% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

XYL

8.70%

Machinery Industry

Max
34.68%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.13%
Q1
8.53%
Min
-4.87%

XYL’s Return on Equity of 8.70% is on par with the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

VRSK vs. XYL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

VRSK

30.67%

Professional Services Industry

Max
26.06%
Q3
13.34%
Median
7.88%
Q1
3.50%
Min
-2.93%

VRSK’s Net Profit Margin of 30.67% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

XYL

10.74%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.74%
Q3
11.24%
Median
8.13%
Q1
5.38%
Min
-1.11%

XYL’s Net Profit Margin of 10.74% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Machinery industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

VRSK vs. XYL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

VRSK

43.94%

Professional Services Industry

Max
35.84%
Q3
19.38%
Median
12.54%
Q1
7.36%
Min
-5.21%

VRSK’s Operating Profit Margin of 43.94% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

XYL

11.81%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
16.15%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-4.91%

XYL’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.81% is around the midpoint for the Machinery industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

VRSK vs. XYL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolVRSKXYL
Return on Equity (TTM)439.17%8.70%
Return on Assets (TTM)19.55%5.66%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)30.67%10.74%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)43.94%11.81%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)69.39%37.81%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

VRSK

1.53

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.45
Q3
1.65
Median
1.26
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

VRSK’s Current Ratio of 1.53 aligns with the median group of the Professional Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

XYL

1.90

Machinery Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.32
Median
1.72
Q1
1.28
Min
0.78

XYL’s Current Ratio of 1.90 aligns with the median group of the Machinery industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

VRSK vs. XYL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

VRSK

10.43

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.44
Median
0.91
Q1
0.49
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 10.43, VRSK operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Professional Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

XYL

0.18

Machinery Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.75
Median
0.44
Q1
0.26
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, XYL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.18 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

VRSK vs. XYL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

VRSK

43.51

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.67
Q3
20.05
Median
11.07
Q1
5.36
Min
-2.22

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 43.51, VRSK demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

XYL

55.35

Machinery Industry

Max
67.55
Q3
33.79
Median
13.87
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

XYL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 55.35 is in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

VRSK vs. XYL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolVRSKXYL
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.531.90
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.441.31
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)10.430.18
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)43.5155.35

Growth

Revenue Growth

VRSK vs. XYL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

VRSK vs. XYL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

VRSK

0.62%

Professional Services Industry

Max
5.28%
Q3
2.51%
Median
1.63%
Q1
0.62%
Min
0.00%

VRSK’s Dividend Yield of 0.62% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

XYL

1.05%

Machinery Industry

Max
5.32%
Q3
2.84%
Median
1.87%
Q1
1.09%
Min
0.00%

XYL’s Dividend Yield of 1.05% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

VRSK vs. XYL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

VRSK

25.76%

Professional Services Industry

Max
109.23%
Q3
64.39%
Median
47.00%
Q1
20.35%
Min
0.00%

VRSK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 25.76% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

XYL

39.55%

Machinery Industry

Max
202.17%
Q3
98.65%
Median
55.54%
Q1
29.03%
Min
0.00%

XYL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 39.55% is within the typical range for the Machinery industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

VRSK vs. XYL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolVRSKXYL
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.62%1.05%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)25.76%39.55%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

VRSK

41.55

Professional Services Industry

Max
49.59
Q3
36.59
Median
28.13
Q1
18.55
Min
10.07

A P/E Ratio of 41.55 places VRSK in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

XYL

37.52

Machinery Industry

Max
53.66
Q3
31.29
Median
22.00
Q1
16.18
Min
7.00

A P/E Ratio of 37.52 places XYL in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

VRSK vs. XYL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

VRSK

12.75

Professional Services Industry

Max
9.54
Q3
5.11
Median
2.10
Q1
0.75
Min
0.11

With a P/S Ratio of 12.75, VRSK trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Professional Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

XYL

4.03

Machinery Industry

Max
5.04
Q3
2.72
Median
1.67
Q1
1.04
Min
0.24

XYL’s P/S Ratio of 4.03 is in the upper echelon for the Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

VRSK vs. XYL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

VRSK

139.79

Professional Services Industry

Max
13.75
Q3
8.87
Median
4.35
Q1
2.43
Min
0.54

At 139.79, VRSK’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Professional Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

XYL

2.84

Machinery Industry

Max
7.23
Q3
3.90
Median
2.52
Q1
1.47
Min
0.49

XYL’s P/B Ratio of 2.84 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

VRSK vs. XYL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolVRSKXYL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)41.5537.52
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)12.754.03
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)139.792.84
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)37.3040.41