Seek Returns logo

VOD vs. VZ: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at VOD and VZ, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

VOD trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, VZ is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolVODVZ
Company NameVodafone Group Public Limited CompanyVerizon Communications Inc.
CountryUnited KingdomUnited States
GICS SectorCommunication ServicesCommunication Services
GICS IndustryWireless Telecommunication ServicesDiversified Telecommunication Services
Market Capitalization28.74 billion USD189.99 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateNovember 2, 1988November 21, 1983
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of VOD and VZ by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

VOD vs. VZ: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolVODVZ
5-Day Price Return2.77%3.59%
13-Week Price Return12.92%1.69%
26-Week Price Return32.92%9.80%
52-Week Price Return20.14%10.60%
Month-to-Date Return7.80%5.38%
Year-to-Date Return29.46%12.68%
10-Day Avg. Volume34.15M15.18M
3-Month Avg. Volume57.28M18.03M
3-Month Volatility19.50%16.44%
Beta1.130.37

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

VOD

-7.42%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
27.67%
Q3
18.94%
Median
13.35%
Q1
6.38%
Min
-8.07%

VOD has a negative Return on Equity of -7.42%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

VZ

18.22%

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
35.96%
Q3
14.90%
Median
8.29%
Q1
-0.99%
Min
-18.19%

In the upper quartile for the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry, VZ’s Return on Equity of 18.22% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

VOD vs. VZ: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Wireless Telecommunication Services and Diversified Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

VOD

-10.83%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
17.18%
Q3
13.67%
Median
9.33%
Q1
4.43%
Min
-5.10%

VOD has a negative Net Profit Margin of -10.83%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

VZ

13.28%

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
28.40%
Q3
13.05%
Median
6.85%
Q1
-0.81%
Min
-18.76%

A Net Profit Margin of 13.28% places VZ in the upper quartile for the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

VOD vs. VZ: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Wireless Telecommunication Services and Diversified Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

VOD

-0.15%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
29.85%
Q3
23.51%
Median
20.46%
Q1
16.06%
Min
9.07%

VOD has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -0.15%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

VZ

22.22%

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
37.46%
Q3
22.24%
Median
15.73%
Q1
9.79%
Min
2.06%

VZ’s Operating Profit Margin of 22.22% is around the midpoint for the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

VOD vs. VZ: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Wireless Telecommunication Services and Diversified Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolVODVZ
Return on Equity (TTM)-7.42%18.22%
Return on Assets (TTM)-3.11%4.76%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-10.83%13.28%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-0.15%22.22%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)33.43%59.48%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

VOD

1.26

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
1.26
Q3
1.00
Median
0.71
Q1
0.60
Min
0.36

VOD’s Current Ratio of 1.26 is in the upper quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

VZ

0.64

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
1.63
Q3
1.14
Median
0.92
Q1
0.68
Min
0.16

VZ’s Current Ratio of 0.64 falls into the lower quartile for the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

VOD vs. VZ: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Wireless Telecommunication Services and Diversified Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

VOD

1.01

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
2.92
Q3
2.15
Median
1.57
Q1
0.91
Min
0.44

VOD’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.01 is typical for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

VZ

1.42

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
3.82
Q3
2.06
Median
1.32
Q1
0.74
Min
0.11

VZ’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.42 is typical for the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

VOD vs. VZ: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Wireless Telecommunication Services and Diversified Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

VOD

-0.02

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
12.67
Q3
6.16
Median
3.95
Q1
1.81
Min
-1.20

VOD has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.02. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

VZ

4.61

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
14.66
Q3
8.25
Median
3.53
Q1
1.47
Min
-2.60

VZ’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.61 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

VOD vs. VZ: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Wireless Telecommunication Services and Diversified Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolVODVZ
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.260.64
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.230.49
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.011.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-0.024.61

Growth

Revenue Growth

VOD vs. VZ: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

VOD vs. VZ: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

VOD

7.33%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
7.63%
Q3
5.13%
Median
3.22%
Q1
2.33%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 7.33%, VOD offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

VZ

5.95%

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
10.34%
Q3
5.44%
Median
3.89%
Q1
1.73%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 5.95%, VZ offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

VOD vs. VZ: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Wireless Telecommunication Services and Diversified Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

VOD

94.94%

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
145.86%
Q3
109.87%
Median
78.85%
Q1
48.65%
Min
0.00%

VOD’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 94.94% is within the typical range for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

VZ

62.46%

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
270.06%
Q3
135.21%
Median
76.62%
Q1
35.06%
Min
0.00%

VZ’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 62.46% is within the typical range for the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

VOD vs. VZ: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Wireless Telecommunication Services and Diversified Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolVODVZ
Dividend Yield (TTM)7.33%5.95%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)94.94%62.46%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

VOD

--

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
34.45
Q3
23.52
Median
16.68
Q1
13.97
Min
7.48

P/E Ratio data for VOD is currently unavailable.

VZ

10.50

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
33.39
Q3
23.91
Median
16.72
Q1
13.00
Min
4.13

In the lower quartile for the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry, VZ’s P/E Ratio of 10.50 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

VOD vs. VZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Wireless Telecommunication Services and Diversified Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

VOD

0.65

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
2.56
Q3
1.94
Median
1.37
Q1
1.22
Min
0.62

In the lower quartile for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry, VOD’s P/S Ratio of 0.65 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

VZ

1.39

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
4.75
Q3
2.60
Median
1.62
Q1
0.94
Min
0.35

VZ’s P/S Ratio of 1.39 aligns with the market consensus for the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

VOD vs. VZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Wireless Telecommunication Services and Diversified Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

VOD

0.40

Wireless Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
4.87
Q3
2.93
Median
2.02
Q1
1.33
Min
0.40

VOD’s P/B Ratio of 0.40 is below the established floor for the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. This may signal that the market is deeply pessimistic or has overlooked the company, potentially offering its asset base at a significant discount.

VZ

1.77

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
5.77
Q3
3.45
Median
2.10
Q1
1.19
Min
0.32

VZ’s P/B Ratio of 1.77 is within the conventional range for the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

VOD vs. VZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Wireless Telecommunication Services and Diversified Telecommunication Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolVODVZ
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--10.50
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.651.39
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)0.401.77
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)2.819.74