Seek Returns logo

VIK vs. VIPS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at VIK and VIPS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

VIK is a standard domestic listing, while VIPS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolVIKVIPS
Company NameViking Holdings LtdVipshop Holdings Limited
CountryBermudaChina
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryHotels, Restaurants & LeisureBroadline Retail
Market Capitalization25.96 billion USD8.21 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMay 1, 2024March 23, 2012
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of VIK and VIPS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

VIK vs. VIPS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolVIKVIPS
5-Day Price Return-1.28%-3.87%
13-Week Price Return22.79%7.69%
26-Week Price Return14.75%7.62%
52-Week Price Return68.53%18.83%
Month-to-Date Return0.85%10.40%
Year-to-Date Return34.41%23.68%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.00M3.04M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.99M3.29M
3-Month Volatility27.72%30.95%
Beta1.420.70

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

VIK

--

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
83.01%
Q3
39.51%
Median
17.38%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-45.92%

Return on Equity data for VIK is currently unavailable.

VIPS

18.88%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
49.17%
Q3
28.98%
Median
19.22%
Q1
10.86%
Min
-11.14%

VIPS’s Return on Equity of 18.88% is on par with the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

VIK vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

VIK

14.20%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.45%
Q3
14.67%
Median
8.69%
Q1
3.34%
Min
-11.30%

VIK’s Net Profit Margin of 14.20% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

VIPS

6.88%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
19.78%
Q3
11.90%
Median
8.63%
Q1
5.21%
Min
0.82%

VIPS’s Net Profit Margin of 6.88% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

VIK vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

VIK

21.61%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
38.76%
Q3
21.15%
Median
14.20%
Q1
6.43%
Min
-14.56%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.61% places VIK in the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

VIPS

8.06%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
27.23%
Q3
15.96%
Median
11.13%
Q1
8.31%
Min
1.77%

VIPS’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.06% is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

VIK vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolVIKVIPS
Return on Equity (TTM)--18.88%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.95%10.28%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)14.20%6.88%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)21.61%8.06%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)42.36%23.36%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

VIK

0.64

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.68
Q3
1.62
Median
1.11
Q1
0.74
Min
0.19

VIK’s Current Ratio of 0.64 falls into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

VIPS

1.28

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
3.54
Q3
2.42
Median
1.49
Q1
1.22
Min
0.67

VIPS’s Current Ratio of 1.28 aligns with the median group of the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

VIK vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

VIK

20.33

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
9.88
Q3
4.54
Median
1.52
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 20.33, VIK operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

VIPS

0.11

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
1.34
Median
0.63
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.11 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

VIK vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

VIK

1.28

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.88
Q3
11.95
Median
3.87
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

VIK’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.28 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

VIPS

150.47

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
20.63
Median
11.28
Q1
4.22
Min
-19.29

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 150.47, VIPS demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Broadline Retail industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

VIK vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolVIKVIPS
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.641.28
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.611.14
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)20.330.11
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.28150.47

Growth

Revenue Growth

VIK vs. VIPS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

VIK vs. VIPS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

VIK

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
5.88%
Q3
2.37%
Median
0.68%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIK currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

VIPS

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.46%
Q3
2.38%
Median
0.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIPS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

VIK vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

VIK

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
127.31%
Q3
56.79%
Median
19.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIK has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

VIPS

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
131.17%
Q3
63.48%
Median
29.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIPS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

VIK vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolVIKVIPS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

VIK

31.47

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
59.44
Q3
33.98
Median
22.25
Q1
15.53
Min
7.61

VIK’s P/E Ratio of 31.47 is within the middle range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

VIPS

7.97

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
66.12
Q3
35.17
Median
16.29
Q1
10.47
Min
5.94

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s P/E Ratio of 7.97 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

VIK vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

VIK

4.47

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.74
Q3
3.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.19
Min
0.17

VIK’s P/S Ratio of 4.47 is in the upper echelon for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

VIPS

0.55

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.40
Q3
3.33
Median
2.04
Q1
0.80
Min
0.16

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s P/S Ratio of 0.55 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

VIK vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

VIK

84.85

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
20.90
Q3
9.78
Median
4.29
Q1
2.22
Min
0.47

At 84.85, VIK’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

VIPS

1.43

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
9.06
Q3
5.22
Median
3.48
Q1
1.90
Min
0.74

VIPS’s P/B Ratio of 1.43 is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

VIK vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolVIKVIPS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)31.477.97
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.470.55
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)84.851.43
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)18.29--