Seek Returns logo

UNP vs. WM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at UNP and WM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolUNPWM
Company NameUnion Pacific CorporationWaste Management, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryGround TransportationCommercial Services & Supplies
Market Capitalization133.84 billion USD91.45 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1980June 22, 1988
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of UNP and WM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

UNP vs. WM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolUNPWM
5-Day Price Return1.88%1.26%
13-Week Price Return-1.66%-3.03%
26-Week Price Return-10.08%-0.58%
52-Week Price Return-8.29%8.42%
Month-to-Date Return1.67%-0.93%
Year-to-Date Return-1.03%12.50%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.88M2.07M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.69M1.71M
3-Month Volatility19.10%16.48%
Beta1.070.66

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

UNP

42.18%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
22.11%
Q3
13.84%
Median
9.66%
Q1
7.55%
Min
0.36%

UNP’s Return on Equity of 42.18% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

WM

31.93%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
18.03%
Median
9.43%
Q1
6.44%
Min
-9.69%

In the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, WM’s Return on Equity of 31.93% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

UNP vs. WM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

UNP

28.43%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.20%
Q3
18.59%
Median
7.11%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-10.38%

A Net Profit Margin of 28.43% places UNP in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

WM

11.36%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
17.53%
Q3
9.01%
Median
5.20%
Q1
2.75%
Min
-2.31%

A Net Profit Margin of 11.36% places WM in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

UNP vs. WM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

UNP

40.33%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
41.31%
Q3
23.16%
Median
11.33%
Q1
6.82%
Min
-12.08%

An Operating Profit Margin of 40.33% places UNP in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

WM

17.52%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.43%
Q3
12.19%
Median
8.10%
Q1
3.18%
Min
-6.03%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.52% places WM in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

UNP vs. WM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolUNPWM
Return on Equity (TTM)42.18%31.93%
Return on Assets (TTM)10.19%6.42%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)28.43%11.36%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)40.33%17.52%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)79.89%39.72%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

UNP

0.65

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.03
Q3
1.26
Median
0.89
Q1
0.73
Min
0.38

UNP’s Current Ratio of 0.65 falls into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

WM

0.86

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
1.89
Median
1.38
Q1
0.87
Min
0.53

WM’s Current Ratio of 0.86 falls into the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

UNP vs. WM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

UNP

2.02

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.47
Min
0.00

UNP’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Ground Transportation industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.02. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

WM

2.61

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
1.67
Q3
1.08
Median
0.73
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.61, WM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Commercial Services & Supplies industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

UNP vs. WM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

UNP

8.23

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
51.07
Q3
22.54
Median
7.94
Q1
2.72
Min
-24.57

UNP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.23 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

WM

6.82

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
12.37
Median
7.16
Q1
2.69
Min
-10.97

WM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.82 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

UNP vs. WM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolUNPWM
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.650.86
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.530.86
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.022.61
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)8.236.82

Growth

Revenue Growth

UNP vs. WM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

UNP vs. WM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

UNP

2.40%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.44%
Q3
2.49%
Median
1.53%
Q1
0.39%
Min
0.00%

UNP’s Dividend Yield of 2.40% is consistent with its peers in the Ground Transportation industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

WM

1.37%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.44%
Q3
2.30%
Median
1.37%
Q1
0.63%
Min
0.00%

WM’s Dividend Yield of 1.37% is consistent with its peers in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

UNP vs. WM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

UNP

46.49%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
137.07%
Q3
74.71%
Median
41.16%
Q1
15.12%
Min
0.00%

UNP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 46.49% is within the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

WM

46.71%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
72.93%
Median
40.45%
Q1
23.31%
Min
0.00%

WM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 46.71% is within the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

UNP vs. WM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolUNPWM
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.40%1.37%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)46.49%46.71%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

UNP

19.36

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.59
Q3
24.86
Median
16.38
Q1
12.79
Min
4.37

UNP’s P/E Ratio of 19.36 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

WM

34.02

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.20
Q3
37.10
Median
22.38
Q1
16.35
Min
0.00

WM’s P/E Ratio of 34.02 is within the middle range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

UNP vs. WM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

UNP

5.51

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.02
Q3
2.20
Median
1.23
Q1
0.87
Min
0.22

With a P/S Ratio of 5.51, UNP trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

WM

3.86

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.64
Q3
2.28
Median
0.97
Q1
0.64
Min
0.00

WM’s P/S Ratio of 3.86 is in the upper echelon for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

UNP vs. WM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

UNP

8.46

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.95
Q3
2.78
Median
1.38
Q1
1.17
Min
0.64

At 8.46, UNP’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

WM

10.01

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.71
Q3
4.38
Median
2.39
Q1
1.57
Min
0.43

At 10.01, WM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

UNP vs. WM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolUNPWM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)19.3634.02
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.513.86
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)8.4610.01
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)21.4542.79