Seek Returns logo

UNP vs. VRT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at UNP and VRT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolUNPVRT
Company NameUnion Pacific CorporationVertiv Holdings Co
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryGround TransportationElectrical Equipment
Market Capitalization133.84 billion USD48.70 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1980August 2, 2018
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of UNP and VRT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

UNP vs. VRT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolUNPVRT
5-Day Price Return1.88%-3.76%
13-Week Price Return-1.66%19.87%
26-Week Price Return-10.08%16.71%
52-Week Price Return-8.29%61.69%
Month-to-Date Return1.67%-12.40%
Year-to-Date Return-1.03%12.26%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.88M6.25M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.69M7.70M
3-Month Volatility19.10%40.24%
Beta1.071.87

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

UNP

42.18%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
22.11%
Q3
13.84%
Median
9.66%
Q1
7.55%
Min
0.36%

UNP’s Return on Equity of 42.18% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

VRT

32.36%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
37.56%
Q3
20.60%
Median
14.38%
Q1
4.35%
Min
0.90%

In the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, VRT’s Return on Equity of 32.36% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

UNP vs. VRT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

UNP

28.43%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.20%
Q3
18.59%
Median
7.11%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-10.38%

A Net Profit Margin of 28.43% places UNP in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

VRT

8.93%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
20.43%
Q3
10.97%
Median
6.07%
Q1
3.16%
Min
0.29%

VRT’s Net Profit Margin of 8.93% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

UNP vs. VRT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

UNP

40.33%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
41.31%
Q3
23.16%
Median
11.33%
Q1
6.82%
Min
-12.08%

An Operating Profit Margin of 40.33% places UNP in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

VRT

13.20%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
26.20%
Q3
14.31%
Median
7.54%
Q1
3.77%
Min
-5.64%

VRT’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.20% is around the midpoint for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

UNP vs. VRT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolUNPVRT
Return on Equity (TTM)42.18%32.36%
Return on Assets (TTM)10.19%8.58%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)28.43%8.93%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)40.33%13.20%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)79.89%35.29%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

UNP

0.65

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.03
Q3
1.26
Median
0.89
Q1
0.73
Min
0.38

UNP’s Current Ratio of 0.65 falls into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

VRT

1.74

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.02
Q3
1.99
Median
1.41
Q1
1.07
Min
0.80

VRT’s Current Ratio of 1.74 aligns with the median group of the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

UNP vs. VRT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

UNP

2.02

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.47
Min
0.00

UNP’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Ground Transportation industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.02. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

VRT

0.93

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
1.44
Q3
0.99
Median
0.56
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

VRT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.93 is typical for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

UNP vs. VRT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

UNP

8.23

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
51.07
Q3
22.54
Median
7.94
Q1
2.72
Min
-24.57

UNP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.23 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

VRT

2.36

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
36.12
Q3
19.29
Median
9.38
Q1
1.16
Min
-10.92

VRT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.36 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

UNP vs. VRT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolUNPVRT
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.651.74
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.531.35
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.020.93
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)8.232.36

Growth

Revenue Growth

UNP vs. VRT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

UNP vs. VRT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

UNP

2.40%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.44%
Q3
2.49%
Median
1.53%
Q1
0.39%
Min
0.00%

UNP’s Dividend Yield of 2.40% is consistent with its peers in the Ground Transportation industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

VRT

0.11%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
2.20%
Q3
1.53%
Median
1.01%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VRT’s Dividend Yield of 0.11% is consistent with its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

UNP vs. VRT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

UNP

46.49%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
137.07%
Q3
74.71%
Median
41.16%
Q1
15.12%
Min
0.00%

UNP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 46.49% is within the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

VRT

6.39%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
119.44%
Q3
51.87%
Median
27.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VRT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.39% is within the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

UNP vs. VRT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolUNPVRT
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.40%0.11%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)46.49%6.39%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

UNP

19.36

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.59
Q3
24.86
Median
16.38
Q1
12.79
Min
4.37

UNP’s P/E Ratio of 19.36 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

VRT

59.82

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
81.85
Q3
44.17
Median
27.61
Q1
18.62
Min
7.73

A P/E Ratio of 59.82 places VRT in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

UNP vs. VRT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

UNP

5.51

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.02
Q3
2.20
Median
1.23
Q1
0.87
Min
0.22

With a P/S Ratio of 5.51, UNP trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

VRT

5.34

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
8.18
Q3
4.02
Median
1.84
Q1
0.97
Min
0.44

VRT’s P/S Ratio of 5.34 is in the upper echelon for the Electrical Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

UNP vs. VRT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

UNP

8.46

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.95
Q3
2.78
Median
1.38
Q1
1.17
Min
0.64

At 8.46, UNP’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

VRT

15.66

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
8.50
Q3
4.53
Median
3.39
Q1
1.70
Min
0.51

At 15.66, VRT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electrical Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

UNP vs. VRT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolUNPVRT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)19.3659.82
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.515.34
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)8.4615.66
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)21.4539.11