Seek Returns logo

UNP vs. VRSK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at UNP and VRSK, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolUNPVRSK
Company NameUnion Pacific CorporationVerisk Analytics, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryGround TransportationProfessional Services
Market Capitalization133.84 billion USD37.84 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1980October 7, 2009
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of UNP and VRSK by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

UNP vs. VRSK: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolUNPVRSK
5-Day Price Return1.88%1.18%
13-Week Price Return-1.66%-13.84%
26-Week Price Return-10.08%-8.34%
52-Week Price Return-8.29%0.62%
Month-to-Date Return1.67%-2.82%
Year-to-Date Return-1.03%-1.66%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.88M1.15M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.69M0.93M
3-Month Volatility19.10%21.38%
Beta1.070.88

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

UNP

42.18%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
22.11%
Q3
13.84%
Median
9.66%
Q1
7.55%
Min
0.36%

UNP’s Return on Equity of 42.18% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

VRSK

439.17%

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.17%
Q3
30.06%
Median
22.21%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-13.44%

VRSK’s Return on Equity of 439.17% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

UNP vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

UNP

28.43%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.20%
Q3
18.59%
Median
7.11%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-10.38%

A Net Profit Margin of 28.43% places UNP in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

VRSK

30.67%

Professional Services Industry

Max
26.06%
Q3
13.34%
Median
7.88%
Q1
3.50%
Min
-2.93%

VRSK’s Net Profit Margin of 30.67% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

UNP vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

UNP

40.33%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
41.31%
Q3
23.16%
Median
11.33%
Q1
6.82%
Min
-12.08%

An Operating Profit Margin of 40.33% places UNP in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

VRSK

43.94%

Professional Services Industry

Max
35.84%
Q3
19.38%
Median
12.54%
Q1
7.36%
Min
-5.21%

VRSK’s Operating Profit Margin of 43.94% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

UNP vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolUNPVRSK
Return on Equity (TTM)42.18%439.17%
Return on Assets (TTM)10.19%19.55%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)28.43%30.67%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)40.33%43.94%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)79.89%69.39%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

UNP

0.65

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.03
Q3
1.26
Median
0.89
Q1
0.73
Min
0.38

UNP’s Current Ratio of 0.65 falls into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

VRSK

1.53

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.45
Q3
1.65
Median
1.26
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

VRSK’s Current Ratio of 1.53 aligns with the median group of the Professional Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

UNP vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

UNP

2.02

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.47
Min
0.00

UNP’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Ground Transportation industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.02. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

VRSK

10.43

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.44
Median
0.91
Q1
0.49
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 10.43, VRSK operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Professional Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

UNP vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

UNP

8.23

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
51.07
Q3
22.54
Median
7.94
Q1
2.72
Min
-24.57

UNP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.23 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

VRSK

43.51

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.67
Q3
20.05
Median
11.07
Q1
5.36
Min
-2.22

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 43.51, VRSK demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

UNP vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolUNPVRSK
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.651.53
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.531.44
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.0210.43
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)8.2343.51

Growth

Revenue Growth

UNP vs. VRSK: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

UNP vs. VRSK: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

UNP

2.40%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.44%
Q3
2.49%
Median
1.53%
Q1
0.39%
Min
0.00%

UNP’s Dividend Yield of 2.40% is consistent with its peers in the Ground Transportation industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

VRSK

0.62%

Professional Services Industry

Max
5.28%
Q3
2.51%
Median
1.63%
Q1
0.62%
Min
0.00%

VRSK’s Dividend Yield of 0.62% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

UNP vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

UNP

46.49%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
137.07%
Q3
74.71%
Median
41.16%
Q1
15.12%
Min
0.00%

UNP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 46.49% is within the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

VRSK

25.76%

Professional Services Industry

Max
109.23%
Q3
64.39%
Median
47.00%
Q1
20.35%
Min
0.00%

VRSK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 25.76% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

UNP vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolUNPVRSK
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.40%0.62%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)46.49%25.76%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

UNP

19.36

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.59
Q3
24.86
Median
16.38
Q1
12.79
Min
4.37

UNP’s P/E Ratio of 19.36 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

VRSK

41.55

Professional Services Industry

Max
49.59
Q3
36.59
Median
28.13
Q1
18.55
Min
10.07

A P/E Ratio of 41.55 places VRSK in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

UNP vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

UNP

5.51

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.02
Q3
2.20
Median
1.23
Q1
0.87
Min
0.22

With a P/S Ratio of 5.51, UNP trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

VRSK

12.75

Professional Services Industry

Max
9.54
Q3
5.11
Median
2.10
Q1
0.75
Min
0.11

With a P/S Ratio of 12.75, VRSK trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Professional Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

UNP vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

UNP

8.46

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.95
Q3
2.78
Median
1.38
Q1
1.17
Min
0.64

At 8.46, UNP’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

VRSK

139.79

Professional Services Industry

Max
13.75
Q3
8.87
Median
4.35
Q1
2.43
Min
0.54

At 139.79, VRSK’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Professional Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

UNP vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolUNPVRSK
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)19.3641.55
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.5112.75
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)8.46139.79
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)21.4537.30