Seek Returns logo

ULTA vs. XPEV: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ULTA and XPEV, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

ULTA is a standard domestic listing, while XPEV trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolULTAXPEV
Company NameUlta Beauty, Inc.XPeng Inc.
CountryUnited StatesChina
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustrySpecialty RetailAutomobiles
Market Capitalization23.57 billion USD22.28 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateOctober 25, 2007August 27, 2020
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ULTA and XPEV by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ULTA vs. XPEV: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolULTAXPEV
5-Day Price Return1.51%11.23%
13-Week Price Return27.77%12.54%
26-Week Price Return45.67%28.24%
52-Week Price Return40.11%233.86%
Month-to-Date Return1.82%26.69%
Year-to-Date Return20.56%95.18%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.62M12.53M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.72M7.45M
3-Month Volatility30.45%52.71%
Beta1.062.54

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ULTA

49.73%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
61.19%
Q3
37.24%
Median
18.81%
Q1
8.92%
Min
-13.03%

In the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, ULTA’s Return on Equity of 49.73% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

XPEV

-15.89%

Automobiles Industry

Max
25.70%
Q3
12.88%
Median
6.92%
Q1
0.71%
Min
-15.89%

XPEV has a negative Return on Equity of -15.89%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

ULTA vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ULTA

10.70%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
21.28%
Q3
10.68%
Median
6.08%
Q1
2.43%
Min
-4.54%

A Net Profit Margin of 10.70% places ULTA in the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

XPEV

-10.15%

Automobiles Industry

Max
9.92%
Q3
5.78%
Median
3.23%
Q1
0.11%
Min
-5.31%

XPEV has a negative Net Profit Margin of -10.15%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

ULTA vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ULTA

14.03%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
33.35%
Q3
15.84%
Median
9.34%
Q1
3.83%
Min
-8.97%

ULTA’s Operating Profit Margin of 14.03% is around the midpoint for the Specialty Retail industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

XPEV

-12.08%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
7.22%
Median
5.29%
Q1
0.43%
Min
-4.46%

XPEV has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -12.08%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

ULTA vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolULTAXPEV
Return on Equity (TTM)49.73%-15.89%
Return on Assets (TTM)20.15%-6.30%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)10.70%-10.15%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)14.03%-12.08%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)38.55%16.38%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ULTA

1.67

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
2.83
Q3
1.89
Median
1.39
Q1
1.11
Min
0.64

ULTA’s Current Ratio of 1.67 aligns with the median group of the Specialty Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

XPEV

1.21

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.54
Median
1.26
Q1
1.09
Min
0.48

XPEV’s Current Ratio of 1.21 aligns with the median group of the Automobiles industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ULTA vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ULTA

0.00

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
3.02
Q3
1.57
Median
0.64
Q1
0.20
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, ULTA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

XPEV

0.42

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.34
Q3
1.13
Median
0.58
Q1
0.28
Min
0.06

XPEV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 is typical for the Automobiles industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ULTA vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ULTA

649.00

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
48.12
Q3
35.95
Median
14.13
Q1
3.61
Min
-36.00

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 649.00, ULTA demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Specialty Retail industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

XPEV

-19.31

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
42.86
Median
13.88
Q1
2.13
Min
-49.07

XPEV has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -19.31. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

ULTA vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolULTAXPEV
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.671.21
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.391.00
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)649.00-19.31

Growth

Revenue Growth

ULTA vs. XPEV: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ULTA vs. XPEV: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ULTA

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
6.53%
Q3
2.69%
Median
1.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ULTA currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

XPEV

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.71%
Q3
5.39%
Median
3.14%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

XPEV currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ULTA vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ULTA

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
165.81%
Q3
80.94%
Median
31.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ULTA has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

XPEV

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
114.43%
Q3
59.30%
Median
37.15%
Q1
16.40%
Min
0.00%

XPEV has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ULTA vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolULTAXPEV
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ULTA

19.42

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
48.56
Q3
29.15
Median
22.00
Q1
15.46
Min
7.95

ULTA’s P/E Ratio of 19.42 is within the middle range for the Specialty Retail industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

XPEV

--

Automobiles Industry

Max
27.69
Q3
19.99
Median
9.85
Q1
6.60
Min
4.25

P/E Ratio data for XPEV is currently unavailable.

ULTA vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ULTA

2.61

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.08
Q3
2.69
Median
1.23
Q1
0.48
Min
0.09

ULTA’s P/S Ratio of 2.61 aligns with the market consensus for the Specialty Retail industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

XPEV

2.45

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.52
Q3
0.84
Median
0.41
Q1
0.23
Min
0.08

With a P/S Ratio of 2.45, XPEV trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Automobiles industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

ULTA vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ULTA

7.32

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
16.93
Q3
7.98
Median
3.69
Q1
1.79
Min
0.21

ULTA’s P/B Ratio of 7.32 is within the conventional range for the Specialty Retail industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

XPEV

4.61

Automobiles Industry

Max
4.25
Q3
2.00
Median
0.87
Q1
0.46
Min
0.19

At 4.61, XPEV’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Automobiles industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ULTA vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolULTAXPEV
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)19.42--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.612.45
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.324.61
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)19.19--